Assessing users’ experience of shared sanitation facilities: A case study of community ablution blocks in Durban, South Africa

Despite significant financial investment, the effective implementation and sustained use of water and sanitation (WATSAN) technologies remains a chimera, with one billion people using unimproved water facilities and two and a half billion not benefitting from adequate sanitation. The poor success rate of WATSAN interventions results from a predominance of supply-driven approaches which lack recipients’ inputs into planning and implementation to ensure that technologies are fully absorbed and adapted to users’ needs. In the academic literature, users’ feedback and experiences of technologies in the post-implementation phase have received scarce attention. The purpose of this study is to investigate users’ experience of sanitation technologies in the early post-implementation phase, when opportunities for remedial intervention are still available. Fieldwork comprising semi-structured interviews was undertaken with users and potential recipients of three community ablution blocks (CABs) in informal settlements around Durban. Results suggest that non-technical aspects such as affordability or cleanliness of the facilities can affect acceptance among the investigated communities. User training is positively associated with higher levels of facility maintenance as well as satisfaction with its functionality. A comparison between users and potential recipients of CABs shows that perceived health benefits, attitudes in case of  problems, and trust are affected by use of the facilities. Conclusions relate to how early post-implementation assessments of users’ experience could enhance the process of acceptance and management of the technology, thereby increasing progress towards achievement of the related Millenium Development Goals. Keywords: Ablution blocks, user acceptance, eThekwini municipality, Durban, sanitation

[1]  Larry A. Swatuk,et al.  Is the Pungwe water supply project a solution to water accessibility and sanitation problems for the households of Sakubva, Zimbabwe? , 2002 .

[2]  Kathy Eales Some challenges for DEWATS approaches in South Africa. , 2010 .

[3]  Sundar Burra,et al.  Community-designed, built and managed toilet blocks in Indian cities , 2003 .

[4]  Linda Stalker Prokopy,et al.  The Relationship between Participation and Project Success : Evidence from Rural Water Supply Projects in India , 2003 .

[5]  Jana Mittermaier,et al.  UNICEF – United Nations Children's Fund , 2010 .

[6]  A. Sergio,et al.  IRC SYMPOSIUM : SANITATION FOR THE URBAN POOR PARTNERSHIPS AND GOVERNANCE , 2008 .

[7]  P. Emerson,et al.  Sustainability and acceptability of latrine provision in The Gambia. , 2005, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[8]  P. Emerson,et al.  Characteristics of latrine promotion participants and non‐participants; inspection of latrines; and perceptions of household latrines in Northern Ghana , 2007, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[9]  P. Emerson,et al.  Household latrine use, maintenance and acceptability in rural Zinder, Niger , 2007, International Journal of Environmental Health Research.

[10]  M Lübken,et al.  Development of an empirical mathematical model for describing and optimizing the hygiene potential of a thermophilic anaerobic bioreactor treating faeces. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  The multiple perspective concept: With applications to technology assessment and other decision areas , 1981 .

[12]  Paul L. Younger,et al.  Pro-poor water technologies working both ways: Lessons from a two-way, south–north interchange , 2007 .

[13]  Paul Jeffrey,et al.  A Conceptual Model of ‘Receptivity’ Applied to the Design and Deployment of Water Policy Mechanisms , 2004 .