Simplified methods to analyze geosynthetic mattress resting on deformable foundation soil

ABSTRACT A special case of geosynthetic tubes is the geosynthetic mattress characterized by its larger width-to-height ratio and higher lateral-force-resisting capacity. When the geosynthetic mattresses are adopted for dike or breakwater construction in coastal engineering projects, they are often laid on deformable foundation soil. The induced ground settlement will influence the cross-sections and tensile forces of the geosynthetic mattresses. Two analytical methods, called the Winkler foundation method and the e–log p method, are proposed in this paper to analyze the geosynthetic mattresses resting on deformable foundation soil. For the Winkler foundation method, the subgrade soil is assumed as a Winkler elastic foundation represented by the modulus of subgrade reaction, Kf. For the e–log p method, the 1D consolidation relationship (e–log p curve) is adopted to describe the behavior of the subgrade soil within which the distribution of vertical surcharge is calculated using Boussinesq equation. The numerical analyses using FLAC are also conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed methods. The differences between the analytical and numerical solutions are also discussed. It is found from this paper that the proposed e–log p method is more suitable than the Winkler foundation method for the calculation of the geosynthetic mattress resting on deformable foundation soil.

[1]  Raymond H. Plaut,et al.  Stacked geomembrane tubes for flood control: experiments and analysis , 2005 .

[2]  Wei Guo Geosynthetic tubes and mats : experimental and analytical studies , 2012 .

[3]  Shuwang Yan,et al.  Simplified analytical solution for geosynthetic tube resting on deformable foundation soil , 2015 .

[4]  Jian Chu,et al.  Analysis of geosynthetic tubes inflated by liquid and consolidated soil , 2014 .

[5]  Shuwang Yan,et al.  Geosynthetic mattress: Analytical solution and verification , 2013 .

[6]  Raymond H. Plaut,et al.  Two-dimensional analysis of stacked geosynthetic tubes on deformable foundations , 1999 .

[7]  Shuwang Yan,et al.  Analytical solutions for geosynthetic tube resting on rigid foundation , 2014 .

[8]  Hocine Oumeraci,et al.  Australian and German experiences on the use of geotextile containers , 2007 .

[9]  R. H. Plaut,et al.  Two-dimensional analysis of geosynthetic tubes , 1998 .

[10]  Shuwang Yan,et al.  Construction of an offshore dike using slurry filled geotextile mats , 2010 .

[11]  Robert Kohl,et al.  Advanced Soil Mechanics , 2016 .

[12]  Shuwang Yan,et al.  A simplified method for design of geosynthetic tubes , 2014 .

[13]  T. W. Yee,et al.  Modelling the geotextile tube dewatering process , 2012 .

[14]  M. J. Box A New Method of Constrained Optimization and a Comparison With Other Methods , 1965, Comput. J..

[15]  Raymond H. Plaut,et al.  USE OF AN APRON TO STABILIZE GEOMEMBRANE TUBES FOR FIGHTING FLOODS , 2004 .

[16]  Eun-Chul Shin,et al.  Coastal erosion prevention by geotextile tube technology , 2007 .

[17]  Stefan Cantré,et al.  Design method for geotextile tubes considering strain – Formulation and verification by laboratory tests using photogrammetry , 2011 .

[18]  J. E. Glynn,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[19]  Jian Chu,et al.  Geosynthetic Tubes and Geosynthetic Mats: Analyses and Applications , 2011 .

[20]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[21]  Raymond H. Plaut,et al.  Wedged geomembrane tubes as temporary flood-fighting devices , 2002 .

[22]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  Geosynthetic Tubes for Confining Pressurized Slurry: Some Design Aspects , 1996 .

[23]  Braja Das,et al.  Advanced Soil Mechanics 3rd ed , 2008 .

[24]  Carin L. Roberts-Wollmann,et al.  TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF FOUR TYPES OF WATER-FILLED GEOMEMBRANE TUBES AS TEMPORARY FLOOD-FIGHTING DEVICES , 2003 .