Visuomotor modules in the vertebrate brain.

Most accounts of vision assume that its function is largely perceptual, providing an internal model or representation of the external world that serves as the visual foundation for thought and action. However, the evolutionary origins of vision are not representational. Vision evolved not to provide perception of the world but to provide distal control of the many different movements that animals make. Moreover, many of these visuomotor control systems are quite modular in their input-output organization. In humans and other primates, these visuomotor modules function quite independently from the neural mechanisms mediating perception-based knowledge of the world. This division of labour between action systems and perception systems can be seen in the organization of the visual pathways in the primate cerebral cortex. The ventral stream of projections from striate cortex to inferotemporal cortex is critical to the visual perception of objects and is intimately connected with the cognitive operations, while the dorsal stream projecting from striate cortex to the posterior parietal region is essential for the required visuomotor transformations for the on-line control of skilled actions directed at those objects. The perceptual representations constructed by the ventral stream allow us to select a particular course of action with respect to objects and events in the world; the visuomotor transformations carried out by the dorsal stream allow us to program and direct any visually guided movements that are required to carry out that course of action. Thus, to understand the organization of the visual system(s), it is necessary to understand the requirements of the different output systems that vision serves.

[1]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[3]  J. Stein The representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[4]  K. S. Lashley,et al.  The mechanism of vision. XVI. The functioning of small remnants of the visual cortex , 1939 .

[5]  R. Weale Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[6]  J. L. Gould Ethology: The Mechanisms and Evolution of Behavior , 1982 .

[7]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Florence Richardson A study of the sensory control in the rat. , 1909 .

[9]  B. Kolb,et al.  The Cerebral cortex of the rat , 1990 .

[10]  M. Goodale,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Orientation in Rodents: Targets Versus Places , 1983 .

[11]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  M. Goodale,et al.  Chapter 28 Visual pathways to perception and action , 1993 .

[14]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[15]  M. Perenin,et al.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of image size and retinal motion in the computation of absolute distance by the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) , 1990, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Ewert Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: Prey-catching in toads , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  M. Goodale,et al.  Blindsight in rodents: The use of a ‘high-level’ distance cue in gerbils with lesions of primary visual cortex , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Distance estimation in the mongolian gerbil: The role of dynamic depth cues , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  D. Ingle,et al.  Two Visual Systems in the Frog , 1973, Science.

[22]  S. Scott,et al.  Cortical control of reaching movements , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[24]  R. Gregory,et al.  Evolution of the Eye and Visual System , 1991 .

[25]  M. Goodale Visual pathways supporting perception and action in the primate cerebral cortex , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  J. T. Russell,et al.  Depth Discrimination in the Rat , 1932 .

[27]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[29]  M. Arbib,et al.  Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements , 1986 .

[30]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[31]  F. R. Robinson A study of sensory control in the rat , 2022 .

[32]  D. Ingle Some effects of pretectum lesions on the frogs' detection of stationary objects , 1980, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  P. Dean,et al.  Event or emergency? Two response systems in the mammalian superior colliculus , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  H. Klüver Visual Functions After Removal of the Occipital Lobes , 1941 .