Critical interplay between density-dependent predation and evolution of the selfish herd

Animal grouping behaviors have been widely studied due to their implications for understanding social intelligence, collective cognition, and potential applications in engineering, artificial intelligence, and robotics. An important biological aspect of these studies is discerning which selection pressures favor the evolution of grouping behavior. The selfish herd hypothesis states that concentrated groups arise because prey selfishly attempt to place their conspecifics between themselves and the predator, thus causing an endless cycle of movement toward the center of the group. Using an evolutionary model of a predator-prey system, we show that the predator attack mode plays a critical role in the evolution of the selfish herd. Following this discovery, we show that density-dependent predation provides an abstraction of Hamilton's original formulation of "domains of danger." Finally, we verify that density-dependent predation provides a sufficient selective advantage for prey to evolve the selfish herd in response to predation by coevolving predators. Thus, our work verifies Hamilton's selfish herd hypothesis in a digital evolutionary model, refines the assumptions of the selfish herd hypothesis, and generalizes the domain of danger concept to density-dependent predation.

[1]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[2]  M. Aldana,et al.  New tools for characterizing swarming systems: A comparison of minimal models , 2008 .

[3]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[5]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Robert Sabourin,et al.  Gaussian mixture modeling for dynamic particle swarm optimization of recurrent problems , 2012, GECCO '12.

[7]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming , 2012 .

[8]  Graham Kendall,et al.  Evolving Collective Behavior in an Artificial Ecology , 2001, Artificial Life.

[9]  Guy Beauchamp,et al.  Vigilance in a selfish herd , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  F. Dyer The biology of the dance language. , 2002, Annual review of entomology.

[11]  R. Tollrian,et al.  Prey swarming: which predators become confused and why? , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Ernesto Costa,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Particle Swarm and Predator Prey Optimisation , 2002, AICS.

[13]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Some Causes of the Variable Shape of Flocks of Birds , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  Lee Spector,et al.  Emergence of Collective Behavior in Evolving Populations of Flying Agents , 2003, GECCO.

[15]  Magdalene Marinaki,et al.  A honey bees mating optimization algorithm for the open vehicle routing problem , 2011, GECCO '11.

[16]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[18]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[19]  A. J. Wood,et al.  Evolving the selfish herd: emergence of distinct aggregating strategies in an individual-based model , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Integrated Information Increases with Fitness in the Evolution of Animats , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[22]  James W. Haefner,et al.  The selfish herd revisited : do simple movement rules reduce relative predation risk ? , 1994 .

[23]  C. Tosh Which conditions promote negative density dependent selection on prey aggregations? , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Guy Beauchamp,et al.  Reduced flocking by birds on islands with relaxed predation , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  R James,et al.  Geometry for mutualistic and selfish herds: the limited domain of danger. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  John L Quinn,et al.  Testing domains of danger in the selfish herd: sparrowhawks target widely spaced redshanks in flocks , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The dilemma of the selfish herd: the search for a realistic movement rule. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  S Erol Swarm Robotics: From Sources of Inspiration to Domains of Application , 2005 .

[29]  J. Urry Complexity , 2006, Interpreting Art.

[30]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  P. Dugan,et al.  FLOCK FEEDING AND FOOD INTAKE IN LITTLE EGRETS: THE EFFECTS OF PREY DISTRIBUTION AND BEHAVIOUR , 1991 .

[32]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Analysis of the publications on the applications of particle swarm optimisation , 2008 .

[33]  J. W. Wekesa,et al.  Effect of body size on swarming behavior and mating success of maleAnopheles freeborni (Diptera: Culicidae) , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[34]  Richard James,et al.  Spatial positioning in the selfish herd , 2011 .

[35]  Mengjie Zhang,et al.  Multi-objective particle swarm optimisation (PSO) for feature selection , 2012, GECCO '12.

[36]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[37]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[38]  A. W. F. Edwards,et al.  The statistical processes of evolutionary theory , 1963 .

[39]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  G. Martin The eye of a passeriform bird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): eye movement amplitude, visual fields and schematic optics , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.