Strategies for selecting recombinant CHO cell lines for cGMP manufacturing: Improving the efficiency of cell line generation

Transfectants with a wide range of cellular phenotypes are obtained during the process of cell line generation. For the successful manufacture of a therapeutic protein, a means is required to identify a cell line with desirable growth and productivity characteristics from this phenotypically wide‐ranging transfectant population. This identification process is on the critical path for first‐in‐human studies. We have stringently examined a typical selection strategy used to isolate cell lines suitable for cGMP manufacturing. One‐hundred and seventy‐five transfectants were evaluated as they progressed through the different assessment stages of the selection strategy. High producing cell lines, suitable for cGMP manufacturing, were identified. However, our analyses showed that the frequency of isolation of the highest producing cell lines was low and that ranking positions were not consistent between each assessment stage, suggesting that there is potential to improve upon the strategy. Attempts to increase the frequency of isolation of the 10 highest producing cell lines, by in silico analysis of alternative selection strategies, were unsuccessful. We identified alternative strategies with similar predictive capabilities to the typical selection strategy. One alternate strategy required fewer cell lines to be progressed at the assessment stages but the stochastic nature of the models means that cell line numbers are likely to change between programs. In summary, our studies illuminate the potential for improvement to this and future selection strategies, based around use of assessments that are more informative or that reduce variance, paving the way to improved efficiency of generation of manufacturing cell lines. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2010

[1]  G. M. Lee,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis of chimeric antibody-producing CHO cells in the course of dihydrofolate reductase-mediated gene amplification and their stability in the absence of selective pressure. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  M. Kennard,et al.  The generation of stable, high MAb expressing CHO cell lines based on the artificial chromosome expression (ACE) technology , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Wolfgang Noe,et al.  The Real Meaning of High Expression , 1999 .

[4]  Alan J Dickson,et al.  Stability of protein production from recombinant mammalian cells , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  F. Wurm Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  A. Otte,et al.  Various Expression‐Augmenting DNA Elements Benefit from STAR‐Select, a Novel High Stringency Selection System for Protein Expression , 2007, Biotechnology progress.

[7]  C. Ryu,et al.  Characterization of chimeric antibody producing CHO cells in the course of dihydrofolate reductase-mediated gene amplification and their stability in the absence of selective pressure. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  Renate Kunert,et al.  Identification of transgene integration loci of different highly expressing recombinant CHO cell lines by FISH , 2006, Cytotechnology.

[9]  M. Gossen,et al.  Homogeneity and persistence of transgene expression by omitting antibiotic selection in cell line isolation , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  T. Omasa,et al.  Amplified Gene Location in Chromosomal DNA Affected Recombinant Protein Production and Stability of Amplified Genes , 2000, Biotechnology progress.

[11]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[12]  D. James,et al.  Comparative proteomic analysis of GS-NS0 murine myeloma cell lines with varying recombinant monoclonal antibody production rate. , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Andrew J Racher,et al.  Dynamic analysis of GS‐NS0 cells producing a recombinant monoclonal antibody during fed‐batch culture , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Natalie Muller,et al.  Orbital shaker technology for the cultivation of mammalian cells in suspension. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Michimasa Kishimoto,et al.  Evaluation of stable and highly productive gene amplified CHO cell line based on the location of amplified genes , 2000, Cytotechnology.

[16]  Katie F Wlaschin,et al.  Recombinant protein therapeutics from CHO cells : 20 years and counting , 2007 .

[17]  A. Otte,et al.  Employing epigenetics to augment the expression of therapeutic proteins in mammalian cells. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  R. Young,et al.  Toward more efficient protein expression , 2006, Molecular biotechnology.

[19]  C -M. Liu,et al.  Development of a shaking bioreactor system for animal cell cultures. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[20]  Christel Fenge,et al.  Automation of cell line development , 2009, Cytotechnology.

[21]  B. Fox,et al.  The use of UCOE vectors in combination with a preadapted serum free, suspension cell line allows for rapid production of large quantities of protein , 2004, Cytotechnology.

[22]  Renate Kunert,et al.  Process parameter shifting: Part I. Effect of DOT, pH, and temperature on the performance of Epo‐Fc expressing CHO cells cultivated in controlled batch bioreactors , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Mohamed Al-Rubeai,et al.  Uncoupling of cell growth and proliferation results in enhancement of productivity in p21CIP1‐arrested CHO cells , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Mohamed Al-Rubeai,et al.  Selection methods for high-producing mammalian cell lines. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.