Using Virtual Field Trips to Connect Students with University Scientists: Core Elements and Evaluation of zipTrips™

Physical field trips to scientists’ work places have been shown to enhance student perceptions of science, scientists and science careers. Although virtual field trips (VFTs) have emerged as viable alternatives (or supplements) to traditional physical fieldtrips, little is known about the potential of virtual field trips to provide the same or similar science career exploration advantages as physical field trips. The overarching goal of this paper is to describe a VFT, zipTrips™, designed to provide middle school students, especially those in resource limited rural areas, with access to university scientists. Using zipTrips as a case example, the paper identifies and describes some of the core characteristics and elements of high quality authentic VFTs that foster student-scientist interactions. In addition, the paper uses program evaluation data to examine the impact of zipTrips on student perceptions of scientists.

[1]  A. Beale,et al.  Elementary School Career Awareness: A Visit to a Hospital , 2000 .

[2]  Doug Knapp,et al.  Memorable Experiences of a Science Field Trip , 2000 .

[3]  Derek Hodson,et al.  The Effect of Primary Science on Interest in Science: some research problems , 1983 .

[4]  Jan Nespor,et al.  School field trips and the curriculum of public spaces , 2000 .

[5]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  “Thick” authenticity: new media and authentic learning , 1999 .

[6]  Kim Nimon,et al.  Curriculum-Based Virtual Field Trips: Career Development Opportunities for Students with Disabilities , 2006 .

[7]  Kaye Placing,et al.  Virtual Experiences for Secondary Science Teaching. , 2002 .

[8]  Scott Slough,et al.  Interactive virtual expeditions as a learning tool: the School of Rock Expedition case study , 2008 .

[9]  Lilla Robinson,et al.  Virtual Field Trips: The Pros and Cons of an Educational Innovation , 2009 .

[10]  Stephen J. Farenga,et al.  Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences. , 1999 .

[11]  Michael A. Gallo,et al.  Field Trips and Their Effect on Student Achievement and Attitudes: A Comparison of Physical versus Virtual Field Trips to the Indian River Lagoon , 2005 .

[12]  Gilbert L. Naizer,et al.  Science and Engineering Professors: Why Did They Choose Science as a Career? , 1993 .

[13]  J. Falk,et al.  The Field Trip Milieu: Learning and Behavior as a Function of Contextual Events. , 1982 .

[14]  E. Sam Cox *,et al.  Integrating student learning with practitioner experiences via virtual field trips , 2004 .

[15]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[16]  J. Paul Robinson,et al.  A Field Trip without Buses: Connecting Your Students to Scientists through a Virtual Visit. , 2011 .

[17]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction , 1996 .

[18]  Tina Jarvis,et al.  Effect of the challenger experience on elementary children's attitudes to science , 2002 .

[19]  James Kisiel,et al.  More Than Lions and Tigers and Bears: Creating Meaningful Field Trip Lessons , 2006 .

[20]  Kwok-Wing Lai.  Teachers as Facilitators in a Computer‐supported Learning Environment , 1993 .

[21]  Jeremy D. Stoddard,et al.  Toward a Virtual Field Trip Model for the Social Studies , 2009 .

[22]  D. Chambers,et al.  Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw‐a‐scientist test , 1983 .

[23]  Kevin D. Finson.  Drawing a Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know After Fifty Years of Drawings , 2002 .

[24]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Five Standards of Authentic Instruction. , 1993 .