Progression and variability of competitive performance of Olympic swimmers

Estimates of progression and variability of athletic performance in competitions are useful for researchers and practitioners interested in factors that affect performance. We used repeated-measures mixed modelling to analyse 676 official race times of 26 US and 25 Australian Olympic swimmers in the 12-month period leading up to the 2000 Olympic Games. Progression was expressed as percent changes in mean performance; variability was expressed as the coefficient of variation in performance of an individual swimmer between races. Within competitions, both nations showed similar improvements in mean time from heats through finals (overall 1.2%; 95% confidence limits 1.1 to 1.3%). Mean competition time also improved over 12 months by a similar amount in both nations (0.9%; 95% confidence limits 0.6 to 1.2%). The US swimmers showed a greater improvement between the finals (a difference of 0.5%; 95% confidence limits −0.2 to 1.1%), which paralleled changes in the medal haul of the two nations. The coefficient of variation in performance time for a swimmer between races was 0.60% (95% confidence limits 0.56 to 0.65%) within a competition and 0.80% (95% confidence limits 0.73 to 0.86%) between competitions. Our results show that: (a) to stay in contention for a medal, an Olympic swimmer should improve his or her performance by ∼1% within a competition and by ∼1% within the year leading up to the Olympics; (b) an additional enhancement of ∼0.4% (one-half the between-competition variability) would substantially increase the swimmer's chances of a medal.

[1]  N Heddle,et al.  Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[2]  A M Stewart,et al.  Seasonal training and performance of competitive swimmers , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Design and analysis of research on sport performance enhancement. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  M. Stoové,et al.  What are we looking at, and how big is it? , 2003 .

[5]  David B Pyne,et al.  Relationship between world-ranking and Olympic performance of swimmers , 2004, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Variability of competitive performance of distance runners. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  A M Stewart,et al.  Consistency of swimming performance within and between competitions. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  G. Atkinson Does size matter for sports performance researchers? , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  I Mujika,et al.  Swimming Performance Changes During the Final 3 Weeks of Training Leading to the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games , 2002, International journal of sports medicine.

[10]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Reliability of Power in Physical Performance Tests , 2001, Sports medicine.

[11]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[12]  D. Pyne,et al.  Monitoring the lactate threshold in world-ranked swimmers. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.