The Effects of Transgenic Bt Rice on Arthropod Community Structure During Storage

Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) riceandnon-Bt riceonthe arthropodcommunity structure during storage were studied. Dried and cleaned grains (200 kg of F1 hybrid transgenic rice) from each rice variety were stored at unlidded ceramic pots (100 cm high, 80 cm diameter), and then stored in a 10-year-old barn. To investigate the species and number of arthropods using a needle-point sampler, each pot had 1 kg of grain sampled from both the upper layer (0–35 cm) and the lower layer (35–70 cm) every 15 days. The results showed 12 species of arthropods including Corrodentia, Acarina, Chelonethida, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Hymenoptera were found. No significant differences were observed in the community structure parameters of the arthropods between transgenic Bt rice and non-Bt rice. In both rice varieties, Liposcelis bostrychophilus exhibited the highest level of abundance of community structure, followed by Rhizopertha dominica and Tyrophagus putrescentiae. Overall, there was no significant difference in the temporal dominance curve profiles of the three dominant arthropods between Bt and non-Bt rice. Our results indicated that transgenic Bt rice generally exerts no remarkable negative effects on the arthropod community during storage.

[1]  W. Qiong,et al.  Effects of and ecological safety insect-resistant Cry1Ac/sck transgenic rice on key non-target pests in paddy fields , 2007 .

[2]  Chen Kang-gui Effects of and Ecological Safety Insect-Resistant Cry1Ac/sck Transgenic Rice on Key Non-Target Pests in Paddy Fields , 2007 .

[3]  Wei Tang,et al.  Development of insect-resistant transgenic indica rice with a synthetic cry1C* gene , 2006, Molecular Breeding.

[4]  Liu Yu Evaluation of the effects of insect-resistant cry1Ac/sck transgenic rice on the parasitoid communities in paddy fields , 2006 .

[5]  S. Naranjo Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of TransgenicBtCotton on the Abundance of Nontarget Arthropod Natural Enemies , 2005 .

[6]  John R. Ruberson,et al.  Canopy- and Ground-Dwelling Predatory Arthropods in Commercial Bt and non-Bt Cotton Fields: Patterns and Mechanisms , 2005 .

[7]  Carol L. Pilcher,et al.  Field Evaluation of the Impact of Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)–Protected Bt Corn on Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods , 2005 .

[8]  Steven E. Naranjo,et al.  Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Abundance of Nontarget Arthropod Natural Enemies , 2005 .

[9]  Carol L. Pilcher,et al.  Field Evaluation of the Impact of Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)–Protected Bt Corn on Ground-Dwelling Invertebrates , 2005 .

[10]  S. Raina,et al.  Elite Indica Transgenic Rice Plants Expressing Modified Cry1Ac Endotoxin of Bacillus Thuringiensis Show Enhanced Resistance to Yellow Stem Borer (Scirpophaga Incertulas) , 2002, Transgenic Research.

[11]  G. Khush Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice , 1997, Plant Molecular Biology.

[12]  B. Tabashnik,et al.  Resistance Management for Sustainable Use of Bacillus thuringiensis Crops in Integrated Pest Management , 2004 .

[13]  Q. Ye,et al.  Effect of straws from Bt-transgenic rice on selected biological activities in water-flooded soil , 2004 .

[14]  F. S. Walters,et al.  The Mode of Action of the Bacillus thuringiensis Vegetative Insecticidal Protein Vip3A Differs from That of Cry1Ab δ-Endotoxin , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  N. Ellstrand Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  A. Hilbeck,et al.  Effects of transgenic Bt corn litter on the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[17]  Jan-Peter Nap,et al.  The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[18]  Marcel Dicke,et al.  Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[19]  Allison A. Snow,et al.  Transgenic crops—why gene flow matters , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  G. Poppy,et al.  Population‐scale laboratory studies of the effect of transgenic plants on nontarget insects , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[21]  J. Losey,et al.  Transgenic Insecticidal Corn: Beyond Insecticidal Toxicity to Ecological Complexity , 2001 .

[22]  I. Altosaar,et al.  Field Evaluation of Resistance of Transgenic Rice Containing a Synthetic cry1Ab Gene from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner to Two Stem Borers , 2001, Journal of economic entomology.

[23]  Cai-guo Xu,et al.  Field performance of transgenic elite commercial hybrid rice expressing Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  P. Teng,et al.  Rice Pest Constraints in Tropical Asia: Quantification of Yield Losses Due to Rice Pests in a Range of Production Situations , 2002 .

[25]  G. Poppy,et al.  Parasitoid behaviour and Bt plants , 1999, Nature.

[26]  P. Barbosa,et al.  Impact of Cry3A-Intoxicated Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Pollen on Consumption, Development, and Fecundity of Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) , 1998 .

[27]  R. Sweeney Insect pests of stored products in Nyasaland. , 1961 .