Delivery of a nebulized aerosol to a lung model during mechanical ventilation. Effect of ventilator settings and nebulizer type, position, and volume of fill.

Several factors may affect the delivery of a nebulized aerosol to the lung through an endotracheal tube during mechanical ventilation. To study these factors in vitro, a model representing ventilation of an adult patient was constructed by linking a Servo 900C ventilator to a standard humidified circuit and an endotracheal (ET) tube positioned within a pipe representing the trachea. This was connected via a filter to a lung simulator. Nebulizers filled with 99mTc human serum albumin were positioned in the circuit, and the delivery of nebulized aerosol through the ET tube into the filter was measured using a gamma camera. With the use of an inspiratory phase-activated System 22 Acorn jet nebulizer, typical adult ventilator settings, and a 3-ml nebulizer solution volume, 5.4% of the nebulizer dose reached beyond the end of the ET tube. This was increased by increasing the inspiratory time, reducing the respiratory rate or respiratory minute volume, and by repositioning the nebulizer on the inspiratory limb of the Y-piece and was reduced by slowing the driving gas flow to the nebulizer. Under the same conditions, delivery was 3.1 and 4.4% using the Samsonic and Fisoneb ultrasonic nebulizers, respectively. Increasing the fill volume and the addition of an aerosol storage chamber increased delivery with all three nebulizers. These experiments suggest some simple ways of improving aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation, including increasing the volume of nebulizer fill, repositioning the nebulizer in the ventilator circuit, adding an aerosol storage chamber, and adjusting ventilator settings to maximize delivery.

[1]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Which apparatus for inhaled pentamidine? A comparison of pulmonary deposition via eight nebulisers. , 1991, The European respiratory journal.

[2]  M. Silverman,et al.  Evaluation of nebulizers for use in neonatal ventilator circuits. , 1990, Critical care medicine.

[3]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Pulmonary deposition of nebulised pentamidine isethionate: effect of nebuliser type, dose, and volume of fill. , 1990, Thorax.

[4]  M. Newhouse,et al.  Pressurized aerosol versus jet aerosol delivery to mechanically ventilated patients. Comparison of dose to the lungs. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[5]  S. Clarke,et al.  Droplet size distributions of nebulised aerosols for inhalation therapy. , 1986, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[6]  R. Coleman,et al.  Aerosol delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[7]  M. Newhouse,et al.  Pulmonary aerosol deposition in chronic bronchitis: intermittent positive pressure breathing versus quiet breathing. , 1977, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  P. Gay,et al.  Evaluation of bronchodilator responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[9]  J. Hughes,et al.  Effects of nebulizer mode and position in a mechanical ventilator circuit on dose efficiency , 1987 .

[10]  M. Flavin,et al.  Aerosol delivery to the rabbit lung with an infant ventilator , 1986, Pediatric pulmonology.

[11]  R. Ahrens,et al.  The delivery of therapeutic aerosols through endotracheal tubes , 1986, Pediatric pulmonology.