Knowledge Production and Knowledge Transfer: A Study of Two Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT, Madras and IIT, Bombay)

Institutions of higher education engaged in teaching and research have come to occupy an important place in the knowledge production and knowledge transfer. These institutions are now seen as frontiers of innovation and in capitalizing knowledge assets contributing to economic progress, and aiding national economies in international competitiveness. In this paper two Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) are taken up for case studies. IITs in India have evolved as country’s leading engineering institutions over the last six decades. The structure of teaching courses and research in IITs, right from the beginning, has drawn inspiration from the MIT model. Over the last six decades, Indian IITs have acquired international recognition and a ‘brand name’ for excellence in teaching and producing quality engineering and science graduates. Through ‘human capital’ and research contribution, IITs have come to occupy a significant position in the Indian national innovation system, particularly during the last decade. The two institutions explored in this study, namely IIT Madras and IIT Bombay, are clear examples of the IIT system as whole. The major objective in this paper is to explore knowledge production and knowledge transfer in these two institutions. Our focus is laid on the ways in which institutional structures have progressed over the last decade or so to foster and promote university-industry linkages and enterprise creation. Secondly, our concern has been to explore the extent to which the Indian IITs have embraced entrepreneurial university ‘culture’ or still uphold the values of ‘Humboldtian Model’ of teaching and research excellence. Thirdly, to explore how the two institutes differ in the processes of knowledge transfer and enterprise creation.

[1]  Sharon A. McDade Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education , 2003 .

[2]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Universities in National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[3]  Linsu Kim,et al.  National system of industrial innovation : dynamics of capability building in Korea , 1991 .

[4]  C. Freeman Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[5]  Diana Hicks,et al.  University-industry research links in Japan , 1993 .

[6]  R. Bailey,et al.  Is the University in Ruins , 2008 .

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[8]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[9]  B. Dalum National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[10]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[11]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[12]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences? , 2001 .

[13]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  The University in the Learning Economy , 2002 .

[14]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[15]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[16]  The tamest of tigers? Understanding Hong Kong's innovation system and innovation policies , 2005 .

[17]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[18]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[19]  David Zilberman,et al.  University Research and Offices of Technology Transfer , 2002 .

[20]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[21]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[22]  C. Freeman Technology, policy, and economic performance , 1987 .

[23]  V. Krishna Science, Technology and Counter Hegemony — Some Reflections on the Contemporary Science Movements in India , 1997 .

[24]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  Towards an “Entrepreneurial University” Model to Support Knowledge-Based Economic Development: The Case of the National University of Singapore , 2007 .

[25]  Bill Readings,et al.  The university in ruins , 1996 .

[26]  M. Gibbons Higher Education Relevance in the 21st Century. , 1998 .

[27]  Robert Kneller,et al.  Intellectual property rights and university—industry technology transfer in Japan , 1999 .

[28]  Y. Gingras,et al.  The place of universities in the system of knowledge production , 2000 .

[29]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability , 2006 .

[30]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[31]  V. Krishna Reflections on the changing status of academic science in India. , 2001, International social science journal.

[32]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Entrepreneurial science: the second academic revolution , 1998 .

[33]  Pankaj Chandra,et al.  Role of Educational and R&D Institutions in City Clusters: An Exploratory Study of Bangalore and Pune Regions in India , 2007 .

[34]  Shulin Gu Implications Of National Innovation Systems For Developing Countries: Managing Change And Complexity In Economic Development , 1999 .