Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response.

OBJECTIVE This study was designed to compare the fetal response to the vibroacoustic stimulation test when applied alternately over the fetal vertex or breech. STUDY DESIGN Two hundred five patients with a nonreactive nonstress test after 10 minutes were prospectively randomized to receive the vibroacoustic stimulation test over the fetal vertex (n = 115) or the fetal breech (n = 90). Fetal heart rate reactivity was evaluated. Two patient subsets were evaluated for fetal movement (n = 37) and the fetal startle response (n = 20) after the vibroacoustic stimulation test. RESULTS Virtually identical fetal heart rate responses and increases in fetal movement were observed after vibroacoustic stimulation over the fetal vertex or breech. The fetal startle response was uniformly observed in both groups. CONCLUSION Vibroacoustic stimulation over the fetal breech elicits an identical short-term fetal response compared with stimulation over the fetal vertex, potentially reducing the intensity of sound exposure at the fetal ear.

[1]  R. Paul,et al.  Fetal acoustic stimulation testing: a retrospective experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  R. Paul,et al.  Intrauterine Sound Levels: Intrapartum Assessment with an Intrauterine Microphone , 1990, American journal of perinatology.

[3]  R. Abrams,et al.  Intrauterine noise levels produced in pregnant ewes by sound applied to the abdomen. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  S. Arulkumaran,et al.  No Evidence of Hearing Loss Due to Fetal Acoustic Stimulation Test , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  K. Gerhardt.  Prenatal and perinatal risks of hearing loss. , 1990, Seminars in perinatology.

[6]  D. Richards.  The fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: an update. , 1990, Seminars in perinatology.

[7]  R. Pujol,et al.  Critical Periods of Susceptibility to Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 1986 .

[8]  J. D. de Vries,et al.  The emergence of fetal behaviour. I. Qualitative aspects. , 1982, Early human development.

[9]  Roger P. Hamernik,et al.  Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 1986, NATO ASI Series.

[10]  R. Romero,et al.  A critical appraisal of fetal acoustic stimulation as an antenatal test for fetal well-being. , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  S. Arulkumaran,et al.  Vibroacoustic Stimulation and Intrauterine Sound Pressure Levels , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  U. Reddy,et al.  Fetal movement during labor. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  S. Clark,et al.  Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  D. Strobino,et al.  Preterm and term fetal cardiac and movement responses to vibratory acoustic stimulation. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  D. Nagey,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate response to sound stimulation: the acoustic stimulation test. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.