Streptococcus oralis Biofilm Formation on Titanium Surfaces.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare the Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation on titanium machined turned surfaces and sandblasted surfaces that were previously characterized for their superficial topographies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two commercially pure titanium surfaces were analyzed and compared: machined (turned surfaces subjected to a process of decontamination that also included a double acid attack) and sandblasted (sandblasted surfaces, cleaned with purified water, enzymatic detergent, acetone, and alcohol). The characterization of the samples at the nanolevel was performed using atomic force microscopy, which permitted calculation of the superficial nanoroughness (Ra). The sessile drop method was used to measure the water contact angle in both groups and allowed information to be gained about their wetting properties. Scanning electron microscope and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis allowed comparison of the microtopographic geometry and the chemical composition of the samples. Then, the disks were pre-incubated with saliva in order to form an acquired pellicle. Streptococcus oralis was put on the disks, and both groups were tested at 24 and 48 hours for biofilm biomass evaluation, colony-forming units (CFUs), and live/dead staining for cell viability. RESULTS The sandblasted samples were characterized by a significantly higher level of superficial oxides, superficial roughness, and hydrophilicity, compared with the machined turned samples. Although there were topographic differences, the Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation, quantified in CFUs, and biomass formation at 24 and 48 hours were similar in both groups. With the live/dead staining, the sandblasted disks were characterized by an increased percentage of dead cells compared with the machined disks. CONCLUSION Although significant topographic differences were present between machined and sandblasted disks, the Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation seems to not be significantly affected.

[1]  A. Piattelli,et al.  The Bacterial Anti-Adhesive Activity of Double-Etched Titanium (DAE) as a Dental Implant Surface , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[2]  L. Cellini,et al.  Material characterization and Streptococcus oralis adhesion on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium surfaces used in implantology , 2020, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[3]  A. Scarano,et al.  The Effects of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser (Er: YAG) Irradiation on Sandblasted and Acid-Etched (SLA) Titanium, an In Vitro Study , 2020, Materials.

[4]  P. Tengvall,et al.  An Imbalance of the Immune System Instead of a Disease Behind Marginal Bone Loss Around Oral Implants: Position Paper. , 2020, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  C. Ardila,et al.  Opportunistic pathogens are associated with deteriorated clinical parameters in peri-implant disease. , 2020, Oral diseases.

[6]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Effects of a novel gel containing 5-aminolevulinic acid and red LED against bacteria involved in peri-implantitis and other oral infections. , 2020, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[7]  Â. Roncalli,et al.  A prospective study of the clinical outcomes of peri-implant tissues in patients treated for peri-implant mucositis and followed up for 54 months. , 2019, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[8]  D. Daubert,et al.  Biofilm as a risk factor in implant treatment. , 2019, Periodontology 2000.

[9]  S. Low,et al.  Peri-implantitis a Consensus for Treatment. , 2019, The Journal of oral implantology.

[10]  R. Hilgers,et al.  First Investigation of Dual-Wavelength Lasers (2780 nm Er,Cr:YSGG and 940 nm Diode) on Implants in a Simulating Peri-Implantitis Situation Regarding Temperature Changes in an In Vitro Pocket Model. , 2019, Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery.

[11]  G. Spoto,et al.  Near-infrared LEDS provide persistent and increasing protection against E. faecalis. , 2019, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[12]  M. Seghieri,et al.  Periodontitis affects glucoregulatory hormones in severely obese individuals , 2018, International Journal of Obesity.

[13]  C. Garcia,et al.  A novel approach to create an antibacterial surface using titanium dioxide and a combination of dip-pen nanolithography and soft lithography , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Impact of surface topography and coating on osteogenesis and bacterial attachment on titanium implants , 2018, Journal of tissue engineering.

[15]  G. Rasperini,et al.  Tooth Loss and Dental Implant Outcomes-Where is dentistry going? A Survey by SIdP, the Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology. , 2018, Oral diseases.

[16]  A. Cataldi,et al.  Molecular mechanisms driving Streptococcus mitis entry into human gingival fibroblasts in presence of chitlac-nAg and saliva , 2018, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[17]  T. Mang,et al.  Learning from clinical phenotypes: Low-dose biophotonics therapies in oral diseases. , 2018, Oral diseases.

[18]  A. Riveiro,et al.  Laser Surface Texturing of Polymers for Biomedical Applications , 2018, Front. Phys..

[19]  R. Wadia A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic observational evidence on the effect of periodontitis on diabetes. An update of the EFP-AAP review , 2018, BDJ.

[20]  G. Spoto,et al.  In vitro antimicrobial activity of LED irradiation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2017, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[21]  G. Spoto,et al.  In vitro inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis with a led device. , 2016, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[22]  S. Caputi,et al.  Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formation in different titanium surfaces, an in vitro study. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  N. Sheibani,et al.  The role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry part I: Review of titanium alloys, surface characteristics and treatments , 2016, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[24]  A. Cataldi,et al.  Adhesion of human gingival fibroblasts/Streptococcus mitis co-culture on the nanocomposite system Chitlac-nAg , 2016, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[25]  M. Rosentritt,et al.  Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  L. López-Cerero,et al.  Assessment of periodontal and opportunistic flora in patients with peri-implantitis. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  J. Shibli,et al.  Oral Streptococci Biofilm Formation on Different Implant Surface Topographies , 2015, BioMed research international.

[28]  Aleš Iglič,et al.  Wettability studies of topologically distinct titanium surfaces. , 2015, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[29]  S. J. Baker,et al.  Lipopolysaccharide inhibits or accelerates biomedical titanium corrosion depending on environmental acidity , 2015, International Journal of Oral Science.

[30]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[31]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Experimental evaluation in rabbits of the effects of thread concavities in bone formation with different titanium implant surfaces. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[32]  G. Spoto,et al.  Association between the organoleptic scores, oral condition and salivary β-galactosidases in children affected by halitosis. , 2014, International journal of dental hygiene.

[33]  A. Cataldi,et al.  Saliva improves Streptococcus mitis protective effect on human gingival fibroblasts in presence of 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate , 2013, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[34]  T. Attin,et al.  Polyspecies biofilm formation on implant surfaces with different surface characteristics , 2013, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[35]  Paolo A Netti,et al.  Determinants of cell–material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  G. Spoto,et al.  Spectrophotometric assessment of salivary β-galactosidases in halitosis , 2012, Journal of breath research.

[37]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  In situ analysis of multispecies biofilm formation on customized titanium surfaces. , 2011, Molecular oral microbiology.

[38]  L. Cellini,et al.  Effect of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate on Streptococcus spp. biofilms , 2011, Letters in applied microbiology.

[39]  A R Boccaccini,et al.  Recent progress in inorganic and composite coatings with bactericidal capability for orthopaedic applications. , 2011, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[40]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. , 2010, European cells & materials.

[41]  Robert J. Palmer,et al.  Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[42]  A. Marmur A Guide to the Equilibrium Contact Angles Maze , 2009 .

[43]  A Scarano,et al.  Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[44]  M. Quirynen,et al.  An in vivo Study of the Influence of the Surface Roughness of Implants on the Microbiology of Supra- and Subgingival Plaque , 1993, Journal of dental research.