Positive predictive value of the Becton Dickinson VIPER system and the ProbeTec GC Qx assay, in extracted mode, for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Objectives Performance of the new Becton Dickinson ProbeTec GC Qx assay on the BD VIPER platform was evaluated to ascertain whether confirmatory testing is required in our clinical setting. Methods Positive predictive value (PPV) was determined by comparison with culture and a confirmatory nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-based Neisseria gonorrhoeae assay from genital and extragenital samples (rectal and pharyngeal) collected from a genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic. Results Among 14 223 clinical genital samples, 149 (1.0%) specimens were positive using the ProbeTec GC Qx assay, automated on the VIPER platform; 141 of these were confirmed by either culture or a real-time PCR targeting two gonococcal-specific targets (PPV 94.6%; 95% CI 90% to 98%). Among 840 pharyngeal samples, 26 (3.1%) were positive by the ProbeTec GC Qx assay; 13 were confirmed (PPV 50%; 95% CI 30% to 70%). Among 593 rectal samples, 17 tested positive by the ProbeTec GC Qx assay; all were confirmed (PPV 100%; 95% CI 80% to 100%). Conclusions The lower 95% CI of the PPV for the ProbeTec GC Qx assay for genital specimens was >90% in this GUM clinic population, and therefore confirmatory testing for genital specimens is not required. Confirmatory testing of pharyngeal and rectal samples should continue in line with national guidelines.

[1]  A. Nagayama,et al.  Evaluation of APTIMA Combo 2 for cross-reactivity with oropharyngeal Neisseria species and other microorganisms. , 2010, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[2]  S. Alexander The challenges of detecting gonorrhoea and chlamydia in rectal and pharyngeal sites: could we, should we, be doing more? , 2009, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[3]  S. Liska,et al.  Evaluation of Self-Collected Glans and Rectal Swabs from Men Who Have Sex with Men for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  S. Richardson,et al.  Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in pharyngeal and rectal specimens using the BD Probetec ET system, the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay and culture , 2009, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[5]  H. Mallinson,et al.  Confirmation of BD ProbeTec Neisseria gonorrhoeae reactive samples by Gen-Probe APTIMA assays and culture , 2008, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[6]  S. Liska,et al.  Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in the Diagnosis of Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections of the Oropharynx and Rectum in Men Who Have Sex With Men , 2008, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[7]  J. Schachter,et al.  Evaluation of CDC-Recommended Approaches for Confirmatory Testing of Positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Results , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  R. Ballard,et al.  The Molecular Diagnosis of Lymphogranuloma Venereum: Evaluation of a Real-Time Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Test Using Rectal and Urethral Specimens , 2006, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[9]  H. Mallinson,et al.  Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis , 2006, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[10]  D. Whiley,et al.  Nucleic acid amplification testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an ongoing challenge. , 2006, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[11]  D. Whiley,et al.  Comparison of three in‐house multiplex PCR assays for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis using real‐time and conventional detection methodologies , 2005, Pathology.

[12]  S. Garland,et al.  Evaluation of opa-Based Real-Time PCR for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 2005, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[13]  M. Golden,et al.  Positive predictive value of Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a population of women with low prevalence of N. gonorrhoeae infection. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[14]  A. Katz,et al.  False-positive gonorrhea test results with a nucleic acid amplification test: the impact of low prevalence on positive predictive value. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  H. Mallinson,et al.  Evaluation of the Specificities of Five DNA Amplification Methods for the Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  M. Libman,et al.  Confirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection in a Low-Prevalence Population , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[17]  C. Kent,et al.  Increased sensitivity of DNA amplification testing for the detection of pharyngeal gonorrhea in men who have sex with men. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[18]  F. Judson,et al.  Evaluation of a Strand Displacement Amplification Assay (BD ProbeTec-SDA) for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Specimens , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[19]  J. Kelly,et al.  Enhancing the Specificity of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG Test forNeisseria gonorrhoeae by Retesting Specimens with Equivocal Results , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[20]  Charlotte A. Gaydos,et al.  Multicenter Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Specimens, Female Endocervical Swabs, and Male Urethral Swabs , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values , 1994, BMJ.

[22]  E. Hook,et al.  Prevalence and persistence of Neisseria cinerea and other Neisseria spp. in adults , 1988, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[23]  Mike Donnelly,et al.  United Kingdom, 2006 , 2006 .