Performance Comparison for Feed Forward, Elman, and Radial Basis Neural Networks Applied to Line Congestion Study of Electrical Power Systems

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the training performance for three important types of neural networks, namely Feed Forward neural network, Elman neural network, and Radial Basis Function neural network. In order to do this analysis, the authors performed sequential training of all the three neural networks for monitoring the congestion level in the transmission lines of the power system under study. This is accomplished through neural network simulation on the IEEE 30-bus test system under various operating conditions, namely base case, higher loading scenario, and contingency conditions. The findings of this study justify two things. On one hand, the results reveal that all the three neural networks yield successful training and are capable of reducing both the complexity and computational time as compared to the conventional iterative power flow simulation. Furthermore, the comparative analysis justifies that the radial basis function neural network is the fastest of all the three neural networks considered.

[1]  Seema Singh,et al.  Congestion management in competitive power market : A bibliographical survey , 2005 .

[2]  Federico Milano,et al.  Transmission Congestion Management and Pricing in Simple Auction Electricity Markets , 2004 .

[3]  Ilamathi Balamurugan,et al.  ANN - SQP Approach For NOx Emission Reduction In Coal Fired Boilers , 2012 .

[4]  A.J. Conejo,et al.  Congestion management ensuring voltage stability , 2006, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[5]  Alireza Bahmanyar,et al.  Power system voltage stability monitoring using artificial neural networks with a reduced set of inputs , 2014 .

[6]  A. Kumar,et al.  A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Hamidreza Zareipour,et al.  Congestion management using demand response and FACTS devices , 2012 .

[8]  Athula D. Rajapakse,et al.  Online Monitoring of Voltage Stability Margin Using an Artificial Neural Network , 2010 .

[9]  Shanmuga Sundaram Venkatarajan,et al.  A congestion line flow control in deregulated power system , 2011 .

[10]  Pradyumna Kumar Sahoo,et al.  Analysis of Critical Conditions in Electric Power Systems by Feed Forward and Layer Recurrent Neural Networks , 2014 .

[11]  R. Rajathy,et al.  Power Flow Tracing Based Congestion Management Using Differential Evolution in Deregulated Electricity Market , 2012 .

[12]  Yingzhong Gu,et al.  Congestion-induced wind curtailment: Sensitivity analysis and case studies , 2011, 2011 North American Power Symposium.

[13]  Abbas Ketabi,et al.  Radial Basis Function Neural Network Application to Power System Restoration Studies , 2012, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[14]  A. A. El-Keib,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks in voltage stability assessment , 1995 .

[15]  S. Tapaswi,et al.  Price prediction based congestion management using growing RBF neural network , 2008, 2008 Annual IEEE India Conference.

[16]  Xue Li,et al.  Comparison of Levenberg-Marquardt Method and Path Following Interior Point Method for the Solution of Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012 .

[17]  Alberto Berizzi,et al.  Congestion management in a zonal market by a neural network approach , 2009 .