Scales of boundary resistance in coarse-grained channels : turbulent velocity profiles and implications

Gravel-bed surfaces are characterized by morphological features occurring at different roughness scales. The total shear stress generated by the flow above such surfaces is balanced by the sum of friction drag (grain stress) and form drag components (created by bed forms). To facilitate a better understanding of total resistance and bed load transport processes, there is a need to mathematically separate shear stress into its component parts. One way to do so is to examine the properties of vertical velocity profiles above such surfaces. These profiles are characterized by an inner layer that reflects grain resistance and an outer layer that reflects total resistance. A flume-based project was conducted to address these concerns through systematically comparing different roughness scales to ascertain how increased roughness affects the properties of vertical velocity profiles. Great care was taken to create natural roughness features and to obtain flow data at a high spatial and temporal resolution using an Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter. Average vertical velocity profiles above each roughness scale were clearly segmented. The vertical extent of the inner flow region was directly related to the scale of roughness present on the bed (and independent of flow depth), increasing with increased roughness. On a rough but rather uniform “plane” bed made of heterogeneous coarse sediments (with no bed forms), the shape of the velocity profile was clearly dominated by the local variations in grain characteristics. When pebble clusters were superimposed, the average shear stress in the outer flow region increased by 100% from the plane bed conditions. The ratio of inner grain shear stress to outer total shear stress for this pebble cluster experiment was 0.18 under shallow flow conditions and 0.3 under deep flow conditions. The grain stress component that should be used in bed load transport equations therefore appears to vary in these experiments between 15% and 30% of the total channel stress, increasing with decreased resistance. Roughness height (Ks/D50) values at the grain scale for the plane bed and pebble cluster experiments were 0.73 and 0.63, respectively. These are values that should be used in flow resistance equations to predict grain resistance and grain stress for bed load transport modeling.

[1]  S. R. McLean,et al.  Spatially averaged flow over a wavy surface , 1977 .

[2]  E. Andrews Entrainment of gravel from naturally sorted riverbed material , 1983 .

[3]  D. Knighton Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective , 1998 .

[4]  André Robert,et al.  Bed configuration and microscale processes in alluvial channels , 1993 .

[5]  A. Roy,et al.  Turbulence at a roughness transition in a depth limited flow over a gravel bed , 1996 .

[6]  Richard D. Hey,et al.  Bar Form Resistance in Gravel‐Bed Rivers , 1988 .

[7]  Keith Richards,et al.  The influence of microform bed roughness elements on flow and sediment transport in gravel bed rivers: Comment on a paper by marwan A. Hassan and ian reid , 1992 .

[8]  K. Richards The morphology of riffle‐pool sequences , 1976 .

[9]  J. Smith,et al.  Calculations of the critical shear stress for motion of uniform and heterogeneous sediments , 1987 .

[10]  M. A. Carson Closure of "Measures of Flow Intensity as Predictors of Bed Load" , 1987 .

[11]  Henry N. Morris A New Concept of Flow in Rough Conduits , 1954 .

[12]  David Knighton,et al.  Fluvial Forms And Processes: A New Perspective (Hodder , 1998 .

[13]  K. Dyer,et al.  Coastal and Estuarine Sediment Dynamics , 1986 .

[14]  George A. Griffiths,et al.  Form Resistance in Gravel Channels with Mobile Beds , 1989 .

[15]  André Robert,et al.  Boundary roughness in coarse-grained channels , 1990 .

[16]  Keith Richards,et al.  Rivers: Form and Process in Alluvial Channels , 1982 .

[17]  P. L. Wiberg,et al.  Initial motion of coarse sediment in streams of high gradient , 1987 .

[18]  A. Roy,et al.  Changes in velocity profiles at roughness transitions in coarse grained channels , 1992 .

[19]  Gerard Middleton,et al.  Mechanics of sediment movement , 1978 .

[20]  P. Carling Threshold of coarse sediment transport in broad and narrow natural streams , 1983 .

[21]  K. Richards,et al.  River Channels: Environment and Process , 1989 .

[22]  W. N. Melhorn,et al.  Rhythmic spacing and origin of pools and riffles , 1978 .

[23]  A. Roy,et al.  Effects of a pebble cluster on the turbulent structure of a depth-limited flow in a gravel-bed river , 1998 .

[24]  André Robert,et al.  Characteristics of velocity profiles along riffle-pool sequences and estimates of bed shear stress , 1997 .

[25]  B. Bauer,et al.  Turbulence: Perspectives on Flow and Sediment Transport , 1995 .

[26]  Keith Richards,et al.  Estimation of flow resistance in gravel‐bedded rivers: A physical explanation of the multiplier of roughness length , 1992 .

[27]  Arthur R. M. Nowell,et al.  Turbulent flow in a depth‐limited boundary layer , 1979 .

[28]  P. J. Whiting,et al.  Bedload transport of fine gravel observed by motion-picture photography , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.