The Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Evidence from Transition Economies

While existing literature examined the impact of intellectual property protection on the volume of foreign direct investment (FDI), little is known about its effect on the composition of FDI inflows. This paper addresses this question empirically using a unique firm-level data set from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. It finds that weak protection deters foreign investors in technology-intensive sectors that rely heavily on intellectual property rights. Moreover, the results indicate that a weak intellectual property regime encourages investors to undertake projects focusing on distribution rather than local production.

[1]  David A. Dyker,et al.  The technology of transition : science and technology policies for transition countries , 1997 .

[2]  Walter G. Park,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PATENT RIGHTS : A CROSS-NATIONAL STUDY , 1997 .

[3]  J. Oxley.  Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances , 1999 .

[4]  K. Meyer.  Direct Foreign Investment in Eastern Europe the Role of Labor Costs , 1995 .

[5]  Michael J. Ferrantino,et al.  The effect of intellectual property rights on international trade and investment , 1993 .

[6]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[7]  S. Claessens,et al.  World development report 1996 : from plan to market , 1996 .

[8]  Kirsty Hughes,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: Multinationals in Transition , 1997 .

[9]  Carsten Fink,et al.  International transactions in intellectual property and developing countries , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[10]  Iliana Zloch-Christy.  Privatization and Foreign Investments in Eastern Europe , 1995 .

[11]  P. Braunerhjelm,et al.  Host Country Characteristics and Agglomeration in Foreign Direct Investment , 1995 .

[12]  J. Markusen.  The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade , 1995 .

[13]  S. Grubaugh.  Determinants of Direct Foreign Investment , 1987 .

[14]  Alan V. Deardorff,et al.  Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System , 1994 .

[15]  Pamela J. D. Smith.  How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? , 2001 .

[16]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Intellectual Property Protection and U.S. Foreign Direct Investment , 1996 .

[17]  Salvatore Zecchini.  Lessons from the economic transition : Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s , 1997 .

[18]  Rafael Di Tella,et al.  National Champions and Corruption: Some Unpleasant Interventionist Arithmetic , 1997 .

[19]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. , 1995 .

[20]  Gábor Hunya.  Large privatisation, restructuring and foreign direct investment , 1997 .

[21]  S. Wei,et al.  Corruption and Composition of Foreign Direct Investment: Firm-Level Evidence , 1999 .

[22]  K. Maskus,et al.  Intellectual property rights and licensing: An econometric investigation , 2001 .

[23]  J. Dunning,et al.  The New Globalism and Developing Countries , 1998 .

[24]  A. Venables,et al.  Foreign direct investment in economic transition: the changing pattern of investments , 1996 .

[25]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer , 1994 .

[26]  Richard T. Rapp,et al.  Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries , 1990, Journal of World Trade.