Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus

Summary 1. Animals produce sounds for diverse biological functions such as defending territories, attracting mates, deterring predators, navigation, finding food and maintaining contact with members of their social group. Biologists can take advantage of these acoustic behaviours to gain valuable insights into the spatial and temporal scales over which individuals and populations interact. Advances in bioacoustic technology, including the development of autonomous cabled and wireless recording arrays, permit data collection at multiple locations over time. These systems are transforming the way we study individuals and populations of animals and are leading to significant advances in our understandings of the complex interactions between animals and their habitats. 2. Here, we review questions that can be addressed using bioacoustic approaches, by providing a primer on technologies and approaches used to study animals at multiple organizational levels by ecologists, behaviourists and conservation biologists. 3. Spatially dispersed groups of microphones (arrays) enable users to study signal directionality on a small scale or to locate animals and track their movements on a larger scale. 4. Advances in algorithm development can allow users to discriminate among species, sexes, age groups and individuals. 5. With such technology, users can remotely and non-invasively survey populations, describe the soundscape, quantify anthropogenic noise, study species interactions, gain new insights into the social dynamics of sound-producing animals and track the effects of factors such as climate change and habitat fragmentation on phenology and biodiversity. 6. There remain many challenges in the use of acoustic monitoring, including the difficulties in performing signal recognition across taxa. The bioacoustics community should focus on developing a

[1]  H Hermansky,et al.  Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J. Spiesberger,et al.  Passive Localization of Calling Animals and Sensing of their Acoustic Environment Using Acoustic Tomography , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[3]  T. G. Forrest Power output and efficiency of sound production by crickets , 1989 .

[4]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display , 1991 .

[5]  Theodore A. Parker,et al.  On the Use of Tape Recorders in Avifaunal Surveys , 1991 .

[6]  William A. Watkins,et al.  Characterizing acoustic features of marine animal sounds , 1992 .

[7]  John H. L. Hansen,et al.  Discrete-Time Processing of Speech Signals , 1993 .

[8]  B Pinkowski Robust Fourier descriptors for characterizing amplitude-modulated waveform shapes. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  F. Fischer,et al.  QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF GRASSLAND QUALITY: ACOUSTIC DETERMINATION OF POPULATION SIZES OF ORTHOPTERAN INDICATOR SPECIES , 1997 .

[10]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Accuracy of a passive acoustic location system: empirical studies in terrestrial habitats , 1997 .

[11]  T J Hayward Classification by multiple-resolution statistical analysis with application to automated recognition of marine mammal sounds. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J A Kogan,et al.  Automated recognition of bird song elements from continuous recordings using dynamic time warping and hidden Markov models: a comparative study. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Directional acoustic radiation in the strut display of male sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Andrew R. Webb,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1999 .

[15]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[16]  Paul Beier,et al.  EFFECTS OF HELICOPTER NOISE ON MEXICAN SPOTTED OWLS , 1999 .

[17]  D M Farmer,et al.  Computer models for masked hearing experiments with beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  K. Cortopassi,et al.  THE COMPARISON OF HARMONICALLY RICH SOUNDS USING SPECTROGRAPHIC CROSS-CORRELATION AND PRINCIPAL COORDINATES ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[19]  C W Clark,et al.  Calibration and comparison of the acoustic location methods used during the spring migration of the bowhead whale, Balaena mysticetus, off Pt. Barrow, Alaska, 1984-1993. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  James S. Quinn,et al.  A COMPARISON OF POINT COUNTS AND SOUND RECORDING AS BIRD SURVEY METHODS IN AMAZONIAN SOUTHEAST PERU , 2000 .

[21]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[22]  Christopher W. Clark,et al.  A compact digital recording system for autonomous bioacoustic monitoring , 2000 .

[23]  D K Mellinger,et al.  Recognizing transient low-frequency whale sounds by spectrogram correlation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Peter W. C. Paton,et al.  Assessing the Use of Call Surveys to Monitor Breeding Anurans in Rhode Island , 2002 .

[25]  K. Hobson,et al.  Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system , 2002 .

[26]  Ben P. Milner A comparison of front-end configurations for robust speech recognition , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[27]  M. C. Baker,et al.  Population Differentiation in a Complex Bird Sound: A Comparison of Three Bioacoustical Analysis Procedures , 2003 .

[28]  A. Ortolani,et al.  QUANTIFYING ACOUSTIC AND TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF VOCALIZATIONS FOR A GROUP OF CAPTIVE AFRICAN ELEPHANTS LOXODONTA AFRICANA , 2003 .

[29]  Michael T. Johnson,et al.  Automatic classification and speaker identification of African elephant (Loxodonta africana) vocalizations. , 2003 .

[30]  W. Au,et al.  DIRECTIONALITY IN THE WHISTLES OF HAWAIIAN SPINNER DOLPHINS (STENELLA LONGIROSTRIS): A SIGNAL FEATURE TO CUE DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT? , 2003 .

[31]  Mya E. Thompson,et al.  Elephant calling patterns as indicators of group size and composition: the basis for an acoustic monitoring system , 2003 .

[32]  A. Ortolani,et al.  The use of low-frequency vocalizations in African elephant(Loxodonta africana) reproductive strategies , 2003, Hormones and Behavior.

[33]  K. Riede Acoustic monitoring of Orthoptera and its potential for conservation , 1998, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[34]  M. C. Baker The Chorus Song of Cooperatively Breeding Laughing Kookaburras (Coraciiformes, Halcyonidae: Dacelo novaeguineae): Characterization and Comparison Among Groups , 2004 .

[35]  J. Soltis,et al.  African elephant vocal communication II: rumble variation reflects the individual identity and emotional state of callers , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Public, private or anonymous? Facilitating and countering eavesdropping , 2005 .

[37]  Luke Rendell,et al.  Animal Communication Networks, Peter McGregor (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005), Pp. xiv+657. Price £75.00 , 2005 .

[38]  Christopher W. Clark,et al.  A FIELD TEST OF THE ACCURACY OF A PASSIVE ACOUSTIC LOCATION SYSTEM , 2005 .

[39]  Miklós Maróti,et al.  Radio interferometric geolocation , 2005, SenSys '05.

[40]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Individual, age and sex-specific information is contained in yellow-bellied marmot alarm calls , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Joseph Soltis,et al.  African elephant vocal communication I: antiphonal calling behaviour among affiliated females , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  K. Rosenberg,et al.  Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) Persists in Continental North America , 2005, Science.

[43]  Ildar R Urazghildiiev,et al.  Acoustic detection of North Atlantic right whale contact calls using the generalized likelihood ratio test. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  G. Patricelli,et al.  Differences in acoustic directionality among vocalizations of the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) are related to function in communication , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  Kurt M Fristrup,et al.  Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Patrick J Clemins,et al.  Generalized perceptual linear prediction features for animal vocalization analysis. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Flight and echolocation behaviour of whiskered bats commuting along a hedgerow: range-dependent sonar signal design, Doppler tolerance and evidence for `acoustic focussing' , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[48]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  S26-5 Vocal sacs and their role in avian acoustic display , 2006 .

[49]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[50]  Klaus-Michael Exo,et al.  Bird migration studies and potential collision risk with offshore wind turbines , 2006 .

[51]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  The design and implementation of a self-calibrating distributed acoustic sensing platform , 2006, SenSys '06.

[52]  K. Cortopassi,et al.  Contact call diversity in wild orange-fronted parakeet pairs, Aratinga canicularis , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  Geoffrey E. Hill,et al.  Evidence Suggesting that Ivory-billed Woodpeckers (Campephilus principalis) Exist in Florida Données suggérant la présence du Pic à bec ivoire ( Campephilus principalis) en Floride (États-Unis) , 2006 .

[54]  Andrew Farnsworth FLIGHT CALLS OF WOOD-WARBLERS ARE NOT EXCLUSIVELY ASSOCIATED WITH MIGRATORY BEHAVIORS , 2007 .

[55]  T. Ura,et al.  Vocalization based Individual Classification of Humpback Whales using Support Vector Machine , 2007, OCEANS 2007.

[56]  Robert W. Russell,et al.  Monitoring flight calls of migrating birds from an oil platform in the northern Gulf of Mexico , 2007 .

[57]  M. Holderied,et al.  Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis , 2008 .

[59]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Probabilistic Evaluation of Synergetic Ultrasound Pattern Recognition for Large Scale Bat Surveys , 2008 .

[60]  Charles E Taylor,et al.  Automated species recognition of antbirds in a Mexican rainforest using hidden Markov models. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  Nicholas P. Miller,et al.  US National Parks and management of park soundscapes: A review , 2008 .

[62]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Eavesdropping and communication networks revealed through playback and an acoustic location system , 2008 .

[63]  Paul A. Racey,et al.  What you see is not what you get : the role of ultrasonic detectors in increasing inventory completeness in Neotropical bat assemblages , 2008 .

[64]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Post-contest behaviour in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus): loser displays, not victory displays, follow asymmetrical countersinging exchanges , 2008, acta ethologica.

[65]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of black-capped chickadees , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Tied to the nest: male black-capped chickadees decrease dawn chorus movement behaviour when their mate is fertile , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  VoxNet: An Interactive, Rapidly-Deployable Acoustic Monitoring Platform , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (ipsn 2008).

[68]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  Acoustic directionality of red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) song relates to amplitude and singing behaviours , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Context-Dependent Functions of Avian Duets Revealed by Microphone-Array Recordings and Multispeaker Playback , 2008, Current Biology.

[70]  Kyle A. Swiston,et al.  Seasonal variation in acoustic signals of Pileated Woodpeckers , 2008 .

[71]  G. Patricelli,et al.  Vocal and anatomical evidence for two-voiced sound production in the greater sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[72]  Jill L. Deppe,et al.  Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition , 2009 .

[73]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Comparison of manual and automated methods for identifying target sounds in audio recordings of Pileated, Pale-billed, and putative Ivory-billed woodpeckers , 2009 .

[74]  Yuan Yao,et al.  USING SONGS TO IDENTIFY INDIVIDUAL MEXICAN ANTTHRUSH FORMICARIUS MONILIGER: COMPARISON OF FOUR CLASSIFICATION METHODS , 2009 .

[75]  Mya E. Thompson,et al.  Heard but not seen: an acoustic survey of the African forest elephant population at Kakum Conservation Area, Ghana , 2010 .

[76]  Vocal duets in a nonpasserine: an examination of territory defence and neighbour–stranger discrimination in a neighbourhood of barred owls , 2010 .

[77]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  Tactical allocation of effort among multiple signals in sage grouse: an experiment with a robotic female , 2010 .

[78]  Charles E Taylor,et al.  Acoustic localization of antbirds in a Mexican rainforest using a wireless sensor network. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[79]  Lewis Girod,et al.  Is alarm calling risky? Marmots avoid calling from risky places. , 2010, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[80]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Territorial dynamics of Mexican Ant‐thrushes Formicarius moniliger revealed by individual recognition of their songs , 2011 .

[81]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success , 2011 .

[82]  A Primer of Conservation Behavior Daniel T. Blumstein Esteban , 2011, Animal Behaviour.