The Role of Meaning in Contextual Cueing: Evidence from Chess Expertise

In contextual cueing, the position of a search target is learned over repeated exposures to a visual display. The strength of this effect varies across stimulus types. For example, real-world scene contexts give rise to larger search benefits than contexts composed of letters or shapes. We investigated whether such differences in learning can be at least partially explained by the degree of semantic meaning associated with a context independently of the nature of the visual information available (which also varies across stimulus types). Chess boards served as the learning context as their meaningfulness depends on the observer's knowledge of the game. In Experiment 1, boards depicted actual game play, and search benefits for repeated boards were 4 times greater for experts than for novices. In Experiment 2, search benefits among experts were halved when less meaningful randomly generated boards were used. Thus, stimulus meaningfulness independently contributes to learning context–target associations.

[1]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[2]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors , 2005, Psychological science.

[3]  Sarah E. Goldin,et al.  Recognition Memory for Chess Positions: Some Preliminary Research , 1979 .

[4]  J. Vickers,et al.  Gaze characteristics of elite and near-elite athletes in ice hockey defensive tactics. , 2004, Human movement science.

[5]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  Object-intrinsic oddities draw early saccades. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Pertti Saariluoma,et al.  Location Coding in Chess , 1994 .

[7]  N. Charness,et al.  Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: Parallel encoding of chess relations , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: in press Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when , 2022 .

[9]  S. Werner,et al.  Is "Change Blindness" Attenuated by Domain-specific Expertise? An Expert-Novices Comparison of Change Detection in Football Images , 2000 .

[10]  M. Chun,et al.  Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context , 2002 .

[11]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  The role of constraints in expert memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[13]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[14]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  P. de Graef,et al.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.

[16]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search , 2006, Vision Research.

[17]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four … or is it two? , 2004, Memory.

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  Recall of random and distorted chess positions: Implications for the theory of expertise , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[19]  J. Henderson,et al.  Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search , 2006 .

[21]  W. Schneider,et al.  Chess expertise and memory for chess positions in children and adults. , 1993, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  M. Chun Scene Perception and Memory , 2003 .

[25]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[27]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[29]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[30]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  THE MIND'S EYE IN CHESS , 1988 .

[31]  Raúl Reina,et al.  Visual Search Strategies in Experienced and Inexperienced Gymnastic Coaches , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[32]  Michael F. Land,et al.  From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Findlay,et al.  Absence of scene context effects in object detection and eye gaze capture , 2007 .

[34]  M. Fleury,et al.  Expertise Differences in Preparing to Return a Tennis Serve: A Visual Information Processing Approach , 1989 .

[35]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[36]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.