Aggression at the service delivery interface: Do you see what I see?

Abstract Aggression at the service delivery interface (the point of contact between service provider and service recipient) has become a focus of much recent research attention. However, much of what we know is based on cross-sectional survey data – which tells us little about the underlying dynamics within specific aggressive incidents. Further, these data are often collected from the perspective of the service provider alone. For this study, we focused on specific hostile interactions during the delivery of healthcare services and gathered data from the perspectives of service providers and service recipients. Drawing on interviews with US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) staff and US military veterans, we categorised and compared each party's attributions for the initiation of hostile (unpleasant) encounters. We found that staff and veterans had different perspectives on the nature of precipitating factors and that the initial attribution for the event was linked to differences in subsequent responding. These findings are discussed in terms of their insight into the temporal dynamics of aggressive events and their implications for the prevention and management of hostility at the service delivery interface.

[1]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Social Antecedents of Bullying: A Social Interactionist Perspective , 2010 .

[2]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[3]  Stephanie V. Rohdieck,et al.  Who Takes the most Revenge? Individual Differences in Negative Reciprocity Norm Endorsement , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  Denise Salin,et al.  Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment , 2003 .

[5]  D. Zapf,et al.  Conflict escalation and coping with workplace bullying: A replication and extension , 2001 .

[6]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions , 2001 .

[7]  H. Flum.  Relational Dimensions in Career Development. , 2001 .

[8]  Loraleigh Keashly.  Interpersonal and Systemic Aspects of Emotional Abuse at Work: The Target’s Perspective , 2001, Violence and Victims.

[9]  Fiona Lee,et al.  An Attributional Analysis of Social Accounts: Implications of Playing the Blame Game , 2000 .

[10]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  A model of work frustration–aggression , 1999 .

[11]  Christine M. Pearson,et al.  Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the Workplace , 1999 .

[12]  M. Ronald Buckley,et al.  Investigating newcomer expectations and job-related outcomes , 1998 .

[13]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  Examining an Affective Aggression Framework Weapon and Temperature Effects on Aggressive Thoughts, Affect, and Attitudes , 1996 .

[14]  M. Lanza,et al.  Patient assault: a comparison of patient and staff perceptions. , 1995, Issues in mental health nursing.

[15]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: autobiographical narratives about anger. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  William H. Glick,et al.  Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments , 1990 .

[17]  L. Berkowitz.  Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  John P. Wanous,et al.  INSTALLING A REALISTIC JOB PREVIEW: TEN TOUGH CHOICES , 1989 .

[19]  H. Steadman,et al.  Situational Factors in Disputes Leading to Criminal Violence , 1983 .

[20]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Organizational entry : recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers , 1982 .

[21]  P. Bell,et al.  Aggression and heat: mediating effects of prior provocation and exposure to an aggressive model. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Effects of a realistic job preview on job acceptance, job attitudes, and job survival , 1973 .

[23]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[24]  N. Miller.  I. The frustration-aggression hypothesis. , 1941 .

[25]  M. Hénaff,et al.  On the Norm of Reciprocity , 2010 .

[26]  A. Schat,et al.  Training as a Workplace Aggression Intervention Strategy , 2006 .

[27]  Theresa M. Glomb,et al.  Workplace anger and aggression: informing conceptual models with data from specific encounters. , 2002, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[28]  Robert Folger,et al.  A popcorn metaphor for employee aggression. , 1998 .

[29]  D. Clarke,et al.  Temporal architecture of violent incidents. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[30]  Karen E. Dill,et al.  The interactive relations between trait hostility, pain, and aggressive thoughts , 1998 .

[31]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Aggressive reactions to workplace injustice. , 1998 .

[32]  Paul E. Spector.  The Role of Frustration in Antisocial Behavior at Work , 1997 .

[33]  Joel H. Neuman,et al.  Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes , 1996 .

[34]  H. Weiss,et al.  Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. , 1996 .

[35]  S. Fox,et al.  Workplace violence in federal agencies. , 1996 .

[36]  Richard B. Felson,et al.  Violence, aggression & coercive actions , 1994 .

[37]  M. B. Harris,et al.  How provoking! what makes men and women angry? , 1993 .

[38]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[39]  Kim,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement , 1986 .

[40]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .