Pre-combustion CO2 capture from natural gas power plants, with ATR and MDEA processes

Abstract Among the various configurations of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture, this paper focuses on pre-combustion techniques applied to natural gas combined cycles. With more detail, the plant configuration here addressed includes: (i) the steam reforming of natural gas, based on an air-blown autothermal process, following a recuperative pre-reforming treatment, (ii) the water gas shift producing CO 2 and H 2 , (iii) the separation of CO 2 by means of a mixed physical–chemical absorption system using a MDEA solution, and (iv) a hydrogen fuelled combined cycle. Similar configurations have been studied quite extensively, being among the most attractive for full-scale realizations in a near-mid term future. This paper proposes a detailed thermodynamic study and optimization of the plant configuration, bringing to a reliable performance estimation based on today's best available technology as far as the various plant sections are concerned (gas and steam turbine, natural gas reforming process, CO 2 separation). The predicted LHV efficiency for the base configuration is about 50%. Being this value at the top of the range quoted in the open literature studies (35–50%), the paper includes a quite extensive sensitivity analysis, showing that more conservative assumptions may bring to significantly poorer performance, especially considering the pretty large number of operating parameters involved in the process.

[1]  John Lipinski,et al.  Low Emissions Combustion System Development for the GE Energy High Hydrogen Turbine Program , 2008 .

[2]  Alexander S. Leyzerovich Steam turbines: how big can they get? , 2007 .

[3]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine combined-cycle power plant with precombustion CO2 capture , 2005 .

[4]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  IGTC-71 Gas-Turbine-Based Advanced Cycles For Power Generation : Part A: Calculation Model(Session D-2 ADVANCED CYCLE) , 1991 .

[5]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles—Part I: Partial Oxidation , 2002 .

[6]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Technologies for large-scale gas conversion , 2001 .

[7]  Rahul Anantharaman,et al.  Design and off-design analyses of a pre-combustion CO2 capture process in a natural gas combined cycle power plant , 2009 .

[8]  W. C. Reynolds,et al.  The Element Potential Method for Chemical Equilibrium Analysis : Implementation in the Interactive Program STANJAN, Version 3 , 1986 .

[9]  T. Wett Ethylene-capacity rationalization evident , 1983 .

[10]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel , 2003 .

[11]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Long-term coal gasification-based power plants with near-zero emissions. Part A: Zecomix cycle , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas Sandahl Christensen,et al.  Recent developments in autothermal reforming and pre-reforming for synthesis gas production in GTL applications , 2003 .

[13]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  A Thermodynamic Analysis of Different Options to Break 60% Electric Efficiency in Combined Cycle Power Plants , 2004 .

[14]  Robert H. Williams,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions , 2005 .

[15]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Three-reactors chemical looping process for hydrogen production , 2008 .

[16]  J. A. Bullin,et al.  Design & Operation of a Selective Sweetening Plant Using MDEA , 1986 .

[17]  D. R. Stull JANAF thermochemical tables , 1966 .