Phase transition in the economically modeled growth of a cellular nervous system

Spatially embedded complex networks, such as nervous systems, the Internet, and transportation networks, generally have nontrivial topological patterns of connections combined with nearly minimal wiring costs. However, the growth rules shaping these economical tradeoffs between cost and topology are not well understood. Here, we study the cellular nervous system of the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, together with information on the birth times of neurons and on their spatial locations. We find that the growth of this network undergoes a transition from an accelerated to a constant increase in the number of links (synaptic connections) as a function of the number of nodes (neurons). The time of this phase transition coincides closely with the observed moment of hatching, when development switches metamorphically from oval to larval stages. We use graph analysis and generative modeling to show that the transition between different growth regimes, as well as its coincidence with the moment of hatching, may be explained by a dynamic economical model that incorporates a tradeoff between topology and cost that is continuously negotiated and renegotiated over developmental time. As the body of the animal progressively elongates, the cost of longer-distance connections is increasingly penalized. This growth process regenerates many aspects of the adult nervous system’s organization, including the neuronal membership of anatomically predefined ganglia. We expect that similar economical principles may be found in the development of other biological or manmade spatially embedded complex systems.

[1]  Sergio Gómez,et al.  A Complex Network Approach to the Determination of Functional Groups in the Neural System of C. Elegans , 2008, BIOWIRE.

[2]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The network takeover , 2011, Nature Physics.

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[4]  Simon W. Moore,et al.  Efficient Physical Embedding of Topologically Complex Information Processing Networks in Brains and Computer Circuits , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  D. Chklovskii,et al.  Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  Optimally wired subnetwork determines neuroanatomy of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  V Praitis,et al.  sma-1 encodes a betaH-spectrin homolog required for Caenorhabditis elegans morphogenesis. , 1998, Development.

[8]  Gonzalo G de Polavieja,et al.  Structure of deviations from optimality in biological systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S N Dorogovtsev,et al.  Effect of the accelerating growth of communications networks on their structure. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  L. Byerly,et al.  The life cycle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. I. Wild-type growth and reproduction. , 1976, Developmental biology.

[12]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[13]  Marc Barthelemy Crossover from scale-free to spatial networks , 2002 .

[14]  O. Sporns Networks of the Brain , 2010 .

[15]  J. Winn,et al.  Brain , 1878, The Lancet.

[16]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  O. Sporns,et al.  High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Emma K. Towlson,et al.  The Rich Club of the C. elegans Neuronal Connectome , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Alexander Borst,et al.  One Rule to Grow Them All: A General Theory of Neuronal Branching and Its Practical Application , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[22]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[23]  Tobias J. Hagge,et al.  Physics , 1929, Nature.

[24]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Genetic Influences on Cost-Efficient Organization of Human Cortical Functional Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[26]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Newcastle University E-prints Citation for Item: Publisher's Copyright Statement: Neural Development Features: Spatio-temporal Development of the Caenorhabditis Elegans Neuronal Network , 2022 .

[27]  R. Kahn,et al.  Efficiency of Functional Brain Networks and Intellectual Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks , 2003 .

[29]  Shilpa Chakravartula,et al.  Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2014 .

[30]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[31]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  Structural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Simple models of human brain functional networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Alex Arenas An optimization approach to the structure of the neuronal layout of C. elegans , 2008 .