Tiotropium Respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD.

BACKGROUND Tiotropium delivered at a dose of 5 μg with the Respimat inhaler showed efficacy similar to that of 18 μg of tiotropium delivered with the HandiHaler inhalation device in placebo-controlled trials involving patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although tiotropium HandiHaler was associated with reduced mortality, as compared with placebo, more deaths were reported with tiotropium Respimat than with placebo. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial involving 17,135 patients with COPD, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of tiotropium Respimat at a once-daily dose of 2.5 μg or 5 μg, as compared with tiotropium HandiHaler at a once-daily dose of 18 μg. Primary end points were the risk of death (noninferiority study, Respimat at a dose of 5 μg or 2.5 μg vs. HandiHaler) and the risk of the first COPD exacerbation (superiority study, Respimat at a dose of 5 μg vs. HandiHaler). We also assessed cardiovascular safety, including safety in patients with stable cardiac disease. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, Respimat was noninferior to HandiHaler with respect to the risk of death (Respimat at a dose of 5 μg vs. HandiHaler: hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.09; Respimat at a dose of 2.5 μg vs. HandiHaler: hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.14) and not superior to HandiHaler with respect to the risk of the first exacerbation (Respimat at a dose of 5 μg vs. HandiHaler: hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.03). Causes of death and incidences of major cardiovascular adverse events were similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS Tiotropium Respimat at a dose of 5 μg or 2.5 μg had a safety profile and exacerbation efficacy similar to those of tiotropium HandiHaler at a dose of 18 μg in patients with COPD. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; TIOSPIR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01126437.).

[1]  B. Plaud,et al.  Etomidate and general anesthesia: the butterfly effect? , 2013, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  B. Celli,et al.  Treadmill endurance during 2-year treatment with tiotropium in patients with COPD: a randomized trial. , 2013, Chest.

[3]  R. Albert "Lies, damned lies ..." and observational studies in comparative effectiveness research. , 2013, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  G. Pledger,et al.  The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® Trial (TIOSPIR®), a large scale, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial-design and rationale , 2013, Respiratory Research.

[5]  K. Verhamme,et al.  Use of tiotropium Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler versus HandiHaler and mortality in patients with COPD , 2013, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  Hsien-Ho Lin,et al.  Comparative safety of inhaled medications in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2012, Thorax.

[7]  P. Enright,et al.  Pro-arrhythmic and pro-ischaemic effects of inhaled anticholinergic medications , 2012, Thorax.

[8]  Sonal Singh,et al.  Risks associated with tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: overview of the evidence to date , 2012, Therapeutic advances in drug safety.

[9]  S. Salpeter Do Inhaled Anticholinergics Increase or Decrease the Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events? , 2009, Drugs.

[10]  P. Poole,et al.  Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  P. Enright,et al.  Mortality associated with tiotropium mist inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  K. Rabe,et al.  Tiotropium versus salmeterol for the prevention of exacerbations of COPD. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  P. Calverley,et al.  Bias due to withdrawal in long‐term randomised trials in COPD: Evidence from the TORCH study , 2011, The clinical respiratory journal.

[14]  E. Bateman,et al.  A one-year trial of tiotropium Respimat plus usual therapy in COPD patients. , 2010, Respiratory medicine.

[15]  T. Michele,et al.  The safety of tiotropium--the FDA's conclusions. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Decramer,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of tiotropium in patients with COPD. , 2010, Chest.

[17]  M. Decramer,et al.  Mortality in the 4-year trial of tiotropium (UPLIFT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2009, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[18]  J. Castro‐Rodriguez,et al.  Tiotropium and risk for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review with meta-analysis. , 2009, Respiratory medicine.

[19]  Y. Oba Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with inhaled anticholinergics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2009, JAMA.

[20]  J. V. van Noord,et al.  The efficacy of tiotropium administered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler or HandiHaler in COPD patients. , 2009, Respiratory medicine.

[21]  H. Covelli Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with inhaled anticholinergics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2009, JAMA.

[22]  M. Decramer,et al.  A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Bartolome Celli,et al.  Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Bourbeau,et al.  Tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis , 2006, Thorax.