Impact of Knowledge Base on Knowledge Exchange: Commonalities and Differences in the Characteristics of Source and Recipient

In a knowledge transaction, information is shared between a source and recipient. It is argued that the knowledge base of the source and the knowledge base of the recipient will impact an exchange's occurrence. The characteristics of the source's knowledge base and the recipient's knowledge base may be compared in two manners: (1) a single-value continuum and (2) commonalities and differences as separate dimensions. Explanationseconomic, technological, organizational/ strategic, and sociologicalfor knowledge sharing are explored using the single continuum and the two dimension model. We conclude that the rhetoric must change when evaluating actors involved in knowledge sharing. Measurement ramifications for future research and implications for management practitioners are advanced.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Mergers, sell-offs, and economic efficiency , 1987 .

[3]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  INNOVATION IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION PATTERNS IN INTERNATIONAL R&D OPERATIONS , 1998 .

[4]  M. Porter.  From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy , 1989 .

[5]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[6]  J. Hagedoorn.  Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[7]  J. Edwards.  The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[8]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Group-to-Individual Transfer of Learning , 2004 .

[9]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  Knowledge integration in organizations: an empirical assessment , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Gideon D. Markman,et al.  Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs' success , 2000 .

[11]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[12]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Belver C. Griffith,et al.  Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. , 1971 .

[14]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1988 .

[15]  W. Baumol.  The Free-Market Innovation Machine - Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism , 2002 .

[16]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[17]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[18]  Fernando Olivera,et al.  Memory Systems In Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Of Mechanisms For Knowledge Collection, Storage And Access , 2000 .

[19]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Noel P. Greis,et al.  Parent-subsidiary communication in international biotechnology R&D , 1996 .

[21]  E. Hippel.  Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[22]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[23]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development , 2003 .

[25]  Anne P. Carter,et al.  Knowhow trading as economic exchange , 1989 .

[26]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks , 1982 .

[27]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  John G. Michel,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION POSTURE AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[29]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[30]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  A Multilevel Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[32]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[33]  Deepak Malhotra,et al.  Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties , 2004 .

[34]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[36]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages , 2000 .

[37]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[38]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Knowledge resource exchange in strategic alliances , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[39]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[40]  Isabelle Bouty.  Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[41]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Alliance Constellations: A Social Exchange Perspective , 2002 .

[42]  J. Barney.  Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1986 .

[43]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[44]  B. Tomlin,et al.  Inter-location technical communication in a geographically dispersed research organization , 1981 .

[45]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[46]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[47]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Indebtedness: An adverse aspect of asking for and receiving help. , 1971 .

[48]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[49]  H. Demsetz.  The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[50]  M. Schulz.  THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[51]  Reed Elliot Nelson,et al.  On the Shape of Verbal Networks in Organizations , 2001 .

[52]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Digital Information Systems and Global Flagship Networks: How Mobile is Knowledge in the Global Network Economy? , 2002 .

[53]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  R&D performance as a function of internal communication, project management, and the nature of the work , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[54]  P. Rosenzweig.  Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal , 1991 .

[55]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Internal knowledge generation: the research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry , 2000 .

[56]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[57]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[58]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .