Normal saline flushes performed once daily maintain peripheral intravenous catheter patency: a randomised controlled trial

Objective Recent evidence supports the use of normal saline flushes in place of heparin to maintain the patency of peripheral intravenous locks (IVLs); however, there are no data regarding the recommended flush frequency. Study design This was an open, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Children with IVLs, aged 1–17 years, were randomly assigned to receive saline flushing every 12 h (group A) or every 24 h (group B). The main outcome was the maintenance of catheter patency. Results Four hundred patients were randomised; 198 subjects were analysed in the 12 h group and 199 in the 24 h group (three patients were lost at follow-up). Occlusion occurred in 15 children (7.6%) in group A versus 9 (4.5%) in group B (p=0.21). The difference in catheter patency was +3.1% in favour of the 24 h group (95% CI −1.6% to 7.7%), showing the non-inferiority of the 24 h procedure (the non-inferiority margin was set at −4%). Catheter-related complications were not different between the two groups (12.1% in group A vs 9.5% in group B; p=0.42). Conclusions A flushing procedure with one flush per day allows maintenance of catheter patency without an increase in catheter-related complications. We propose a simplification of the flushing procedure with only one flush per day, thereby reducing costs (materials use and nursing time), labour and unnecessary manipulation of the catheters which can cause distress in younger children and their parents. Trial registration number The study is registered in the international database ClinicalTrial.gov under registration number NCT02221024.

[1]  B. Vandermeer,et al.  Low-Dose Heparin Use and the Patency of Peripheral IV Catheters in Children: A Systematic Review , 2013, Pediatrics.

[2]  G. J. van der Wilt,et al.  Effectiveness of heparin solution versus normal saline in maintaining patency of intravenous locks in neonates: a double blind randomized controlled study. , 2011, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  R. Cusson,et al.  Heparinized Saline vs Normal Saline for Maintenance of Intravenous Access in Neonates: An Evidence-Based Practice Change , 2011, Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses.

[4]  M. Sanz Manejo de los dispositivos intravasculares periféricos , 2010 .

[5]  Ma Soledad Grau Sanz [Management of peripheral intravascular devices]. , 2010, Enfermeria clinica.

[6]  Varinder Singh,et al.  Peripheral IVs: Factors Affecting Complications and Patency—A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[7]  M. Chan,et al.  A randomized controlled trial for maintaining peripheral intravenous lock in children. , 2007, International journal of nursing practice.

[8]  L. Gorski Infusion nursing standards of practice. , 2007, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[9]  P. Shah,et al.  Heparin for prolonging peripheral intravenous catheter use in neonates. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  C. Kleiber,et al.  A randomized trial of heparin and saline for maintaining intravenous locks in neonates. , 1998, Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses : JSPN.

[11]  T. Nelson,et al.  0.9% sodium chloride injection with and without heparin for maintaining peripheral indwelling intermittent-infusion devices in infants. , 1998, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[12]  M. Slattery,et al.  Patency of 24-gauge peripheral intermittent infusion devices: a comparison of heparin and saline flush solutions. , 1998, Pediatric nursing.

[13]  K. LeDuc Efficacy of normal saline solution versus heparin solution for maintaining patency of peripheral intravenous catheters in children. , 1997, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[14]  Kotter Rw Heparin vs saline for intermittent intravenous device maintenance in neonates. , 1996 .

[15]  A. Costello,et al.  Parent information binder: individualizing education for parents of preterm infants. , 1996, Neonatal network : NN.

[16]  P. Beecroft,et al.  Intravenous lock patency in children: Dilute heparin versus saline , 1996 .

[17]  R. Kotter Heparin vs saline for intermittent intravenous device maintenance in neonates. , 1996, Neonatal network : NN.

[18]  T. Burroughs,et al.  Double blind comparison of heparin and saline flush solutions in maintenance of peripheral infusion devices. , 1995, Pediatric nursing.

[19]  K. Hanrahan,et al.  Heparin vs. saline for peripheral i.v. locks in children. , 1993, Pediatric nursing.

[20]  I. Fioravanti,et al.  Heparinized Saline Or Normal Saline: As a Flush Solution in Intermittent Intravenous lines In Infants and Children , 1993, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.