Comparison between Drift Test Bench and Other Techniques in Spray Drift Evaluation of an Eight-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Spraying System: The Influence of Meteorological Parameters and Nozzle Types

In the past decade, an unmanned aerial spraying system (UASS) was applied more and more widely for low-volume aerial pesticides spraying operations in China. However, UASS have a higher drift risk due to more fine droplets sprayed with a higher working height and a faster driving speed than ground sprayers. Study on UASS spray drift is a new hot spot within the field of pesticide application technology. The field test bench was originally designed and applied for the measurement of the spray drift potential of ground sprayers. No methodology using the test bench for UASS drift evaluation was reported. Based on our previous study, field drift measurements of an eight-rotor UASS were conducted using three techniques (test bench, ground petri dish, and airborne collection frame) in this study, and the effects of meteorological parameters and nozzle types were investigated, to explore the applicability and the feasibility of the test bench used in UASS field drift evaluation. The test bench is proven promising for direct drift determination of UASS and the described methodology enabled classification of different UASS configurations. Higher wind speeds and finer droplets produced higher drift values. The faster the wind speed and the lower the humidity, the more the spray drift. The test bench can reduce the site requirements and improve the efficiency of the field drift test.

[1]  Zhihong Hu,et al.  Effect of flight velocity on droplet deposition and drift of combined pesticides sprayed using an unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer in a peach orchard , 2022, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[2]  D. R. Aimonino,et al.  UAV-spray application in vineyards: Flight modes and spray system adjustment effects on canopy deposit, coverage, and off-target losses. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Xuemin Wu,et al.  Spray performance evaluation of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer for pesticide application using an orchard operation mode in apple orchards. , 2022, Pest management science.

[4]  W. Gao,et al.  Assessment of spray deposition, drift and mass balance from unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using an artificial vineyard. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  W. Gao,et al.  Spray drift characteristics test of unmanned aerial vehicle spray unit under wind tunnel conditions , 2020, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering.

[6]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Xiongkui He,et al.  The influence of Unmanned Agricultural Aircraft System design on spray drift , 2020 .

[8]  R. Richardson,et al.  Coverage and drift potential associated with nozzle and speed selection for herbicide applications using an unmanned aerial sprayer , 2019, Weed Technology.

[9]  P. Balsari,et al.  Toward a new method to classify the airblast sprayers according to their potential drift reduction: comparison of direct and new indirect measurement methods. , 2019, Pest management science.

[10]  Tang Qing,et al.  Droplet spectra and high-speed wind tunnel evaluation of air induction nozzles , 2018 .

[11]  Xiongkui He,et al.  Drift potential of UAV with adjuvants in aerial applications , 2018 .

[12]  Xiongkui He Rapid Development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for Plant Protection and Application Technology in China , 2018, Outlooks on Pest Management.

[13]  Xiongkui He,et al.  Testing method and distribution characteristics of spatial pesticide spraying deposition quality balance for unmanned aerial vehicle , 2018 .

[14]  D. Giles,et al.  Measurement of Pesticide Drift from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Application to a Vineyard , 2018 .

[15]  E. Gil,et al.  Advances in developing a new test method to assess spray drift potential from air blast sprayers , 2017 .

[16]  Enrique Moltó,et al.  Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift , 2017 .

[17]  He Xiongkui,et al.  Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia , 2017 .

[18]  Bruno C. Vieira,et al.  Spray Drift from Dicamba and Glyphosate Applications in a Wind Tunnel , 2017, Weed Technology.

[19]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Ground Deposition and Airborne Spray Drift Assessment in Vineyard and Orchard: The Influence of Environmental Variables and Sprayer Settings , 2017 .

[20]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Field-crop-sprayer potential drift measured using test bench: Effects of boom height and nozzle type , 2017 .

[21]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Spray drift assessment of different application techniques using a drift test bench and comparison with other assessment methods , 2017 .

[22]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Influence of wind velocity and wind direction on measurements of spray drift potential of boom sprayers using drift test bench , 2015 .

[23]  D. Nuyttens,et al.  Comparison between drift test bench results and other drift assessment techniques. , 2014 .

[24]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Nozzle Classification for Drift Reduction in Orchard Spraying; Identification of Drift Reduction Class Threshold Nozzles , 2008 .

[25]  P. Balsari,et al.  A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk , 2007 .

[26]  D. Nuyttens,et al.  Experimental study of factors influencing the risk of drift from field sprayers, Part 1: Meteorological conditions , 2006 .

[27]  D. Nuyttens,et al.  Wind tunnel evaluation of several tracer and collection techniques for the measurement of spray drift. , 2004, Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences.

[28]  David R. Miller,et al.  Response of spray drift from aerial applications at a forest edge to atmospheric stability , 2000 .

[29]  Steven G. Perry,et al.  Off‐Target Deposition of Pesticides from Agricultural Aerial Spray Applications , 1996 .

[30]  David R. Miller,et al.  Drift of aerially applied diflubenzuron over an oak forest , 1996 .

[31]  H. Combellack Application Technology for Crop Protection , 1993 .

[32]  J. J. Spillman,et al.  Evaporation from freely falling droplets , 1984, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).