Shifting from pharmacological to systematic mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction via a cooperating network: impact on reperfusion rate and in-hospital mortality
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Baldassarre | L. Bolognese | F. Liistro | G. Falsini | K. Ducci | P. Angioli | A. Sabini | A. Burali
[1] David P Miller,et al. Hospital Delays in Reperfusion for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Implications When Selecting a Reperfusion Strategy , 2006, Circulation.
[2] E. Boersma,et al. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. , 2006, European heart journal.
[3] H. Krumholz,et al. Driving Times and Distances to Hospitals With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: Implications for Prehospital Triage of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Circulation.
[4] M. Masotti,et al. Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[5] M. Flather,et al. Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in acute myocardial infarction (CARESS in AMI). , 2004, American heart journal.
[6] G. Lamas,et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] J. T. ten Berg,et al. Primary stenting of occluded native coronary arteries: final results of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries (PRISON) study. , 2004, American heart journal.
[8] E. Topol,et al. Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial. , 2004, American heart journal.
[9] M. Dalby,et al. Transfer for Primary Angioplasty Versus Immediate Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis , 2003, Circulation.
[10] E. Topol,et al. Regionalization of care for acute ischemic heart disease: a call for specialized centers. , 2003, Circulation.
[11] J. Boura,et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .
[12] E. Falk,et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2003, European heart journal.
[13] R. Kaplan,et al. Volume-Outcome Relation for Physicians and Hospitals Performing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State , 2001, Circulation.
[14] U Keil,et al. The ENACT study: a pan-European survey of acute coronary syndromes. European Network for Acute Coronary Treatment. , 2000, European heart journal.
[15] C M Gibson,et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, JAMA.
[16] R. O’Connor,et al. Dangers of delay of initiation of either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with increasing use of primary angioplasty. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.
[17] K. Mann,et al. Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Phase II Trial. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.
[18] E. Braunwald,et al. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.