Integration of soiling-rate measurements and cleaning strategies in yield analysis of parabolic trough plants

The issue of reflector soiling becomes more important as concentrating solar thermal power plants (CSP) are being implemented at sites subject to high dust loads. In an operational power plant, a trade-off between reducing cleaning costs and cleaning related collector availability on the one hand and keeping the solar field cleanliness (ξfield) high to minimize soiling induced losses on the other hand must be found. The common yield analysis software packages system advisor model (SAM) and greenius only allow the input of a constant mean ξfield and constant cleaning costs. This oversimplifies real conditions because soiling is a highly time-dependent parameter and operators might adjust cleaning activities depending on factors such as soiling rate and irradiance. In this study, time-dependent soiling and cleaning data are used for modeling the yield of two parabolic trough plant configurations at two sites in Spain and Morocco. We apply a one-year soiling rate dataset in daily resolution measured with the tracking cleanliness sensor (TraCS). We use this as a basis to model the daily evolution of the cleanliness of each collector of a solar field resulting from the application of various cleaning strategies (CS). The thus obtained daily average ξfield is used to modify the inputs to the yield analysis software greenius. The cleaning costs for each CS are subtracted from the project's financial output parameters to accurately predict the yield of a CSP project over its lifetime. The profits obtained with different CSs are compared in a parameter variation analysis for two sites and the economically best CS is identified. The profit can be increased by more than 2.6% by the application of the best strategy relative to a reference strategy that uses a constant cleaning frequency. The error in profit calculated with constant soiling and cleaning parameters compared to the simulation with variable soiling and cleaning can be as high as 9.4%. With the presented method, temporally variable soiling rates and CS can be fully integrated to CSP yield analysis software, significantly increasing its accuracy. It can be used to determine optimum cleaning parameters.

[1]  R. B. Pettit,et al.  Studies of dust accumulation on solar-mirror materials , 1981 .

[2]  Steve Green,et al.  The effect of dust accumulation on line-focus parabolic trough solar collector performance , 1986 .

[3]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  Final Report on the Operation and Maintenance Improvement Program for Concentrating Solar Power Plants , 1999 .

[4]  David Faiman,et al.  AN OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR THE QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION ON SOLAR COLLECTOR SURFACES , 1999 .

[5]  Rainer Kistner,et al.  greenius - A NEW SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT FOR TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS OF RENEWABLE INDEPENDENT POWER PROJECTS , 2001 .

[6]  H. Price,et al.  Modular Trough Power Plant Cycle and Systems Analysis , 2002 .

[7]  Cole Boulevard,et al.  Executive Summary: Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts , 2003 .

[8]  Rohit Pillai,et al.  Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations , 2010 .

[9]  Marta Vivar,et al.  Effect of soiling in CPV systems , 2010 .

[10]  K. Chhatbar,et al.  The influence of meteorological parameters on the energy yield of solar thermal plants , 2011 .

[11]  G. Morin,et al.  Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector power plants , 2012 .

[12]  Fritz Zaversky,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of a parabolic trough collector power plant – An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2012 .

[13]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  A Novel Method for Automatic Real-Time Monitoring of Mirror Soiling Rates , 2012 .

[14]  Aron Dobos,et al.  System Advisor Model, SAM 2011.12.2: General Description , 2012 .

[15]  Lawrence L. Kazmerski,et al.  A comprehensive review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: History, investigations, results, literature, and mitigation approaches , 2013 .

[16]  Lufuno Vhengani,et al.  Measurements of mirror soiling at a candidate CSP site , 2014 .

[17]  F. Wolfertstettera,et al.  Monitoring of mirror and sensor soiling with TraCS for improved quality of ground based irradiance measurements , 2014 .

[18]  Eckhard Lüpfert,et al.  Screening and Flagging of Solar Irradiation and Ancillary Meteorological Data , 2015 .

[19]  Simon Dieckmann,et al.  Techno-Economic Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projectsusing the Software greenius , 2015 .

[20]  Stefan Wilbert,et al.  Best Practices Handbook for the Collection and Use of Solar Resource Data for Solar Energy Applications , 2015 .

[21]  Lawrence L. Kazmerski,et al.  Dust and soiling issues and impacts relating to solar energy systems: Literature review update for 2012-2015 , 2016 .

[22]  Fabian Wolfertstetter,et al.  Auswirkungen von Verschmutzung auf konzentrierende solarthermische Kraftwerke , 2016 .

[23]  Ahmed Al-Salaymeh,et al.  The enerMENA meteorological network – Solar radiation measurements in the MENA region , 2016 .