ON MULTI-AREA CONTROL IN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS

In this paper we study the concept of electric power system control, when the responsibility for control- ling the entire system is shared by agents controlling their assigned areas. Within this framework, we suggest to study the dynamics created by the interactions of agents. In partic- ular, we discuss the relation that exists between the informa- tion available to the different agents and their optimisation objective, and the performance of the overall power system. Simulations results, carried out on a 39-node power system voltage control problem, are provided and analyzed. They highlight, among others, the sub-optimal performance level attained by the system when the different agents exchange in- formation about their area dynamics without sharing a com- mon control objective.

[1]  L. Wehenkel,et al.  EXaMINE-experimentation of a monitoring and control system for managing vulnerabilities of the European infrastructure for electrical power exchange , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting,.

[2]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[3]  Alexandre Oudalov Coordinated control of multiple facts devices in an electric , 2003 .

[4]  Eduardo Camponogara,et al.  Network control as a distributed, dynamic game , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  An Applications Oriented Guide to Lagrangian Relaxation , 1985 .

[6]  B. H. Kim,et al.  A comparison of distributed optimal power flow algorithms , 2000 .

[7]  Ricardo S Silva Source , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Michael Athans,et al.  A structure-based modeling and control of Electric power systems , 1997, Autom..

[9]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[10]  A. Renaud,et al.  Daily generation scheduling optimization with transmission constraints: a new class of algorithms , 1992 .

[11]  G. Glanzmann,et al.  Incorporation of N-1 Security into Optimal Power Flow for FACTS Control , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[12]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach , 1990 .

[13]  B. H. Kim,et al.  Evaluation of convergence rate in the auxiliary problem principle for distributed optimal power flow , 2002 .

[14]  Cigre CIGRE/IEEE PES International Symposium : quality and security of electric power delivery systems : CIGRE/PES 2003, 08-10 October 2003, Montréal, Canada , 2003 .

[15]  Francisco J. Prieto,et al.  A Decomposition Methodology Applied to the Multi-Area Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  G. Andersson,et al.  Coordinated control of FACTS devices based on optimal power flow , 2005, Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005..

[17]  J. E. Kelley,et al.  The Cutting-Plane Method for Solving Convex Programs , 1960 .

[18]  Eduardo Camponogara,et al.  Collaborative nets , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  P. Pruvot,et al.  An improved voltage control on large-scale power system , 1996 .

[20]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Coarse-grained distributed optimal power flow , 1997 .

[21]  Balho H. Kim,et al.  A fast distributed implementation of optimal power flow , 1999 .

[22]  G. Cohen Optimization by decomposition and coordination: A unified approach , 1978 .

[23]  Francisco J. Prieto,et al.  A decomposition procedure based on approximate Newton directions , 2002, Math. Program..

[24]  X. Wang,et al.  Lagrangian decomposition approach to active power congestion management across interconnected regions , 2001 .

[25]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs , 1960 .

[26]  G. Cohen Auxiliary problem principle and decomposition of optimization problems , 1980 .