Patterns in the species–environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables

Multi-scale investigations of species/environment relationships are an important tool in ecological research. The scale at which independent and dependent variables are measured, and how they are coded for analysis, can strongly influence the relationships that are discovered. However, little is known about how the coding of the dependent variable set influences community-level analyses. In this study, we used canonical correspondence analysis to quantify species/environment relationships between environmental factors collected at three spatial scales and the structure of a forest bird community in the Oregon coast range. The main question in our analysis was how coding the bird data as abundance versus presence/absence affected the nature and strength of observed relationships. As we expected, the structure of the bird community was better described overall using abundance data than it was using presence/absence data. However, individual species and life-history groups appeared to exhibit different species /environment relationships in abundance versus presence/absence data. In particular, common species with a high frequency of occurrence among sample points exhibited a stronger 'abundance' signature, whereas uncommon species with a low frequency of occurrence exhibited a stronger 'presence/absence' signature. In addition, the apparent importance of plot-level factors in explaining the variation in the bird community was greater for abundance data, whereas patch and landscape factors were more important in the presence/absence data. Thus, conclusions about the relative importance of factors at different scales is largely contingent on the way in which the species-response data are coded for analysis. For communities as a whole, and for individual species within them, the strength and nature of species /environment relationships can differ dramatically between analyses using presence/absence versus abundance data.

[1]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[2]  Roger Tory Peterson A field guide to western birds , 1941 .

[3]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Statistical Power of Presence‐Absence Data to Detect Population Declines , 1999 .

[4]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[5]  D. Urban,et al.  Avian response to landscape pattern: The role of species' life histories , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  K. McGarigal Relationship between landscape structure and avian abundance patterns in the Oregon Coast Range , 1993 .

[7]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Hierarchical, Multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  The importance of scaling of multivariate analysis in ecological studies , 2001 .

[9]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[10]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Dispersion of kangaroo rat mounds at multiple scales in New Mexico, USA , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  J. Bart,et al.  Use of Presence-Absence to Measure Changes in Avian Density , 1989 .

[12]  S. Manel,et al.  Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence , 2001 .

[13]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Relationships Between Landscape Structure and Breeding Birds in the Oregon Coast Range , 1995 .

[14]  Timothy F. H. Allen,et al.  Role of Heterogeneity in Scaling of Ecological Systems Under Analysis , 1991 .

[15]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[16]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[17]  Donald A. Jackson Multivariate analysis of benthic invertebrate communities: the implication of choosing particular data standardizations, measures of association, and ordination methods , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Partitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components in a multivariate data set , 1998 .