The influence of pause, attack, and decay duration of the ongoing envelope on sound lateralization.

Klein-Hennig et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 3856-3872 (2011)] introduced a class of high-frequency stimuli for which the envelope shape can be altered by independently varying the attack, hold, decay, and pause durations. These stimuli, originally employed for testing the shape dependence of human listeners' sensitivity to interaural temporal differences (ITDs) in the ongoing envelope, were used to measure the lateralization produced by fixed interaural disparities. Consistent with the threshold ITD data, a steep attack and a non-zero pause facilitate strong ITD-based lateralization. In contrast, those conditions resulted in the smallest interaural level-based lateralization.

[1]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  The effect of overall level on sensitivity to interaural differences of time and level at high frequencies. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  The influence of the envelope waveform on binaural tuning of neurons in the inferior colliculus and its relation to binaural perception. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[3]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of bands of noise and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: effects of spectral locus and bandwidth. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Lateralization produced by interaural intensitive disparities appears to be larger for high- vs low-frequency stimuli. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope on sensitivity to interaural time delays. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Andrew D Brown,et al.  Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. III. Temporal weighting for lateral position judgments. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. Hays Statistics for the social sciences , 1973 .

[9]  Brian S. Nelson,et al.  Spatial Hearing in Echoic Environments: The Role of the Envelope in Owls , 2010, Neuron.

[10]  Dennis McFadden,et al.  Lateralization at high frequencies , 1975 .

[11]  H S Colburn,et al.  Lateral position and interaural discrimination. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Mathias Dietz,et al.  Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Lateralization produced by interaural temporal and intensitive disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: data and modeling. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Constantine Trahiotis,et al.  How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  G. Christopher Stecker,et al.  Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains , 2010, Hearing Research.