The manufacture and assessment of tissue microarrays: suggestions and criteria for analysis, with breast cancer as an example

Tissue microarray (TMA) is an established and valuable tool, particularly in translational research and clinical trials, allowing resource-efficient use, and high-throughput profiling, of large numbers of tumours. Despite this, there is little evidence, or guidance, on the optimum manufacture, use and assessment of TMAs. Here we review some of the literature, using breast cancer as an example, to highlight good practice and pitfalls in the design and manufacture of TMAs. Issues, such as the size, number, spacing and layout of cores, as well as the assessment and reporting of studies using TMAs are addressed. We make some suggestions regarding these challenges, and propose a checklist of features that should be considered in order to stimulate debate and improve the quality of data produced by TMA analysis.

[1]  G. Sauter,et al.  Tissue microarrays for comparing molecular features with proliferation activity in breast cancer , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[2]  Hasnah Hashim,et al.  S100A4 overexpression proves to be independent marker for breast cancer progression , 2008, Cancer Cell International.

[3]  M. Ellis,et al.  Recommendations for collection and handling of specimens from group breast cancer clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  P. Wang,et al.  Comparing the scoring mechanisms of p16INK4a immunohistochemistry based on independent nucleic stains and independent cytoplasmic stains in distinguishing between endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study , 2010, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  A. Thompson,et al.  Prospective comparison of switches in biomarker status between primary and recurrent breast cancer: the Breast Recurrence In Tissues Study (BRITS) , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[6]  P. Lal,et al.  Feasibility of Using Tissue Microarrays for the Assessment of HER-2 Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[7]  R. Love,et al.  Breast cancer hormone receptor assay results of core needle biopsy and modified radical mastectomy specimens from the same patients. , 2010, Clinical breast cancer.

[8]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Semi-quantitative scoring of potentially predictive markers for endocrine treatment of breast cancer: a comparison between whole sections and tissue microarrays , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[9]  D. Faratian,et al.  Tissue microarray technology in the routine assessment of HER‐2 status in invasive breast cancer: a prospective study of the use of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization , 2008, Histopathology.

[10]  Andrew H. Beck,et al.  The Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Response Signature in Breast Carcinoma , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  A. O'Grady,et al.  Tissue microarray technology in the routine assessment of HER2 status in invasive breast cancer , 2009, Histopathology.

[12]  E. Dahl,et al.  Promoter hypermethylation of the SFRP2 gene is a high-frequent alteration and tumor-specific epigenetic marker in human breast cancer , 2008, Molecular Cancer.

[13]  R. Millikan,et al.  Increased claudin‐4 expression is associated with poor prognosis and high tumour grade in breast cancer , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[14]  Tyson V. Sharp,et al.  Differential subcellular localisation of the tumour suppressor protein LIMD1 in breast cancer correlates with patient survival , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[15]  F. B. Sørensen,et al.  Tissue microarrays compared with whole sections and biochemical analyses. A subgroup analysis of DBCG 82 b&c. , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[16]  W. Sauerbrei,et al.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  C. Nguyen,et al.  A candidate molecular signature associated with tamoxifen failure in primary breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[18]  H. Moch,et al.  Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[19]  C. Caldas,et al.  A simple and reliable pretreatment protocol facilitates fluorescent in situ hybridisation on tissue microarrays of paraffin wax embedded tumour samples , 2003, Molecular pathology : MP.

[20]  H. Moch,et al.  Tissue microarrays for gene amplification surveys in many different tumor types. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[21]  H. Putter,et al.  COX2 expression in prognosis and in prediction to endocrine therapy in early breast cancer patients , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  C Blake Gilks,et al.  Assessment of interlaboratory variation in the immunohistochemical determination of estrogen receptor status using a breast cancer tissue microarray. , 2002, American journal of clinical pathology.

[23]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  I. Shih,et al.  Immunohistochemical Panel to Identify the Primary Site of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[25]  J. Kononen,et al.  Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[26]  J. Horiguchi,et al.  The effects of fixation, processing and evaluation criteria on immunohistochemical detection of hormone receptors in breast cancer , 2007, Breast cancer.

[27]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Identification and validation of prognostic markers in breast cancer with the complementary use of array‐CGH and tissue microarrays , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[28]  G. Wilding,et al.  Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[29]  A. Sapino,et al.  Routine assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer using a multicore tissue microarray procedure , 2006, Virchows Archiv.

[30]  I. Amelio,et al.  Elevated Expression of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 Defines a Subset of High-Grade Breast Tumors , 2010, Oncology.

[31]  B. A. Carter,et al.  Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group , 2012 .

[32]  E B Cox,et al.  Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. , 1985, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[33]  P. Drev,et al.  Tissue Microarrays for Routine Diagnostic Assessment of HER2 Status in Breast Carcinoma , 2008, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[34]  M. Buchanan,et al.  Reliance on hormone receptor assays of surgical specimens may compromise outcome in patients with breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Automated quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor expression in breast carcinoma does not differ from expert pathologist scoring: a tissue microarray study of 3,484 cases , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[36]  M. Salto‐Tellez,et al.  Reliability of Tissue Microarrays in Detecting Protein Expression and Gene Amplification in Breast Cancer , 2003, Modern Pathology.

[37]  Kelli Montgomery,et al.  Inter-observer reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical assessment and concordance with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[38]  I. Ellis,et al.  Caveolin 1 and Caveolin 2 are associated with breast cancer basal-like and triple-negative immunophenotype , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[39]  Daniel Birnbaum,et al.  Protein expression profiling identifies subclasses of breast cancer and predicts prognosis. , 2005, Cancer research.

[40]  G. Ball,et al.  High‐throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well‐characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[41]  G. Ball,et al.  A comparative biomarker study of 514 matched cases of male and female breast cancer reveals gender-specific biological differences , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[42]  D. Rimm,et al.  Long-term preservation of antigenicity on tissue microarrays , 2004, Laboratory Investigation.

[43]  V. Speirs,et al.  A novel cell array technique for high-throughput, cell-based analysis , 2005, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[44]  Ian O. Ellis,et al.  Intratumoural heterogeneity of proliferation in invasive breast carcinoma evaluated with MIBI antibody , 1997 .

[45]  A. Gown,et al.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in a large tissue microarray series of node-negative breast cancers. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  Margaret Grant,et al.  Automated image analysis for high‐throughput quantitative detection of ER and PR expression levels in large‐scale clinical studies: The TEAM Trial Experience , 2009, Histopathology.

[47]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[48]  V. Brunton,et al.  Phosphorylated c-Src in the nucleus is associated with improved patient outcome in ER-positive breast cancer , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[49]  Karin Jirström,et al.  Homeobox transcription factor muscle segment homeobox 2 (Msx2) correlates with good prognosis in breast cancer patients and induces apoptosis in vitro , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.