Fair ranking of researchers and research teams

The main drawback of ranking of researchers by the number of papers, citations or by the Hirsch index is ignoring the problem of distributing authorship among authors in multi-author publications. So far, the single-author or multi-author publications contribute to the publication record of a researcher equally. This full counting scheme is apparently unfair and causes unjust disproportions, in particular, if ranked researchers have distinctly different collaboration profiles. These disproportions are removed by less common fractional or authorship-weighted counting schemes, which can distribute the authorship credit more properly and suppress a tendency to unjustified inflation of co-authors. The urgent need of widely adopting a fair ranking scheme in practise is exemplified by analysing citation profiles of several highly-cited astronomers and astrophysicists. While the full counting scheme often leads to completely incorrect and misleading ranking, the fractional or authorship-weighted schemes are more accurate and applicable to ranking of researchers as well as research teams. In addition, they suppress differences in ranking among scientific disciplines. These more appropriate schemes should urgently be adopted by scientific publication databases as the Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) or the Scopus (Elsevier).

[1]  Janusz Miskiewicz,et al.  Effects of Publications in Proceedings on the Measure of the Core Size of Coauthors , 2013, ArXiv.

[2]  Jian Du,et al.  Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices , 2012, Scientometrics.

[3]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .

[4]  Donald Kennedy,et al.  Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems , 2003, Science.

[5]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Field-Normalized Citation Impact Indicators and the Choice of an Appropriate Counting Method , 2015, ISSI.

[7]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Generalizing the H- and G-Indices , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank , 2009, EMBO reports.

[10]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Hui Fang,et al.  Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index , 2011, Scientometrics.

[12]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[13]  D. Lindsey,et al.  Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship , 1982, Scientometrics.

[14]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Gregor E. Morfill,et al.  Nonlinear waves externally excited in a complex plasma under microgravity conditions , 2008 .

[16]  John P.A. Ioannidis,et al.  Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[18]  Leo Egghe.  Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Ç. Şekercioğlu.  Quantifying Coauthor Contributions , 2008, Science.

[21]  Jorge E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship , 2009, Scientometrics.

[22]  M. Rozing,et al.  Profit (p)-Index: The Degree to Which Authors Profit from Co-Authors , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  J. T. Childers,et al.  Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in $pp$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments , 2015, 1503.07589.

[24]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: the co-author core , 2012, Scientometrics.

[25]  Xiaojun Hu,et al.  Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of "equal first authors" and corresponding authors , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Liaojun Pang,et al.  Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Lydia L. Lange,et al.  Citation Counts of Multi-Authored Papers — First-named Authors and Further Authors , 2001, Scientometrics.

[28]  Marek Kosmulski,et al.  The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[29]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[30]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis , 2008, PloS one.

[31]  Serge Galam,et al.  Tailor based allocations for multiple authorship: a fractional gh-index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[32]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations , 2017, Publ..

[33]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Michael Schreiber.  A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  L. S. Kwok,et al.  The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[36]  Xuan Zhen Liu,et al.  Modifying h-index by allocating credit of multi-authored papers whose author names rank based on contribution , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[37]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[38]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[39]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  A note on the interpolated or real-valued h-index with a generalization for fractional counting , 2014, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Andrej A Romanovsky.  Revised h index for biomedical research , 2012, Cell cycle.

[41]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[42]  Michael Schreiber.  A case study of the modified Hirsch index h m accounting for multiple coauthors , 2009 .

[43]  R. Rousseau,et al.  The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[44]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications , 2007, PLoS biology.

[45]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically , 2009, Scientometrics.

[46]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[47]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008 .

[49]  Alexander Yong,et al.  A Critique of Hirsch's Citation Index: A Combinatorial Fermi Problem , 2014, 1402.4357.