Predicting mountain plant richness and rarity from space using satellite‐derived vegetation indices

Can species richness and rarity be predicted from space? If satellite-derived vegetation indices can provide us with accurate predictions of richness and rarity in an area, they can serve as an excellent tool in diversity and conservation research, especially in inaccessible areas. The increasing availability of high-resolution satellite images is enabling us to study this question more carefully. We sampled plant richness and rarity in 34 quadrats (1000 m 2 ) along an elevation gradient between 300 and 2200 m focusing on Mount Hermon as a case study. We then used 10 Landsat, Aster, and QuickBird satellite images ranging over several seasons, going up to very high resolutions, to examine the relationship between plant richness, rarity, and vegetation indices calculated from the images. We used the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), one of the most commonly used vegetation indexes, which is strongly correlated to primary production both globally and locally (in more seasonal and in drier and/or colder environments that have wide ranges of NDVI values). All images showed a positive significant correlation between NDVI and both plant species richness and percentage tree cover (with R 2 as high as 0.87 between NDVI and total plant richness and 0.89 for annual plant richness). The high resolution images enabled us to examine spatial heterogeneity in NDVI within our quadrats. Plant richness was significantly correlated with the standard deviation of NDVI values (but not with their coefficient of variation) within quadrats and between images. Contrary to richness, relative range size rarity was negatively correlated with NDVI in all images, this result being significant in most cases. Thus, given that they are validated by fieldwork, satellite-derived indices can shed light on richness and even rarity patterns in mountains, many of which are important biodiversity centres.

[1]  G. Asner.  Biophysical and Biochemical Sources of Variability in Canopy Reflectance , 1998 .

[2]  G. Asner,et al.  Drought stress and carbon uptake in an Amazon forest measured with spaceborne imaging spectroscopy. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Arnon Karnieli,et al.  Natural vegetation phenology assessment by ground spectral measurements in two semi-arid environments , 2003, International journal of biometeorology.

[4]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  How are diversity and productivity related , 1993 .

[5]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds , 1996 .

[6]  P. Chavez.  Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .

[7]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[8]  W. Gould.  REMOTE SENSING OF VEGETATION, PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS, AND REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS , 2000 .

[9]  N. Sanders.  Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport's rule , 2002 .

[10]  Thomas W. Gillespie,et al.  The Utility of Spectral Indices from Landsat ETM+ for Measuring the Structure and Composition of Tropical Dry Forests 1 , 2005 .

[11]  A. Huete.  A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[12]  A. Shmida,et al.  Biological determinants of species diversity , 1985 .

[13]  C. Tucker.  Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[14]  C. Rahbek.  The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? , 1995 .

[15]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Dissecting the species–energy relationship , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Sensitivity of hyperclustering and labelling land cover classes to Landsat image acquisition date , 2004 .

[17]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Can rarity and diversity be predicted in vegetation along river banks , 1988 .

[18]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Testing the spectral variation hypothesis by using satellite multispectral images , 2004 .

[19]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[20]  C. Tucker,et al.  NASA’s Global Orthorectified Landsat Data Set , 2004 .

[21]  J. Grytnes,et al.  Species Richness and Altitude: A Comparison between Null Models and Interpolated Plant Species Richness along the Himalayan Altitudinal Gradient, Nepal , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[22]  T. Lin,et al.  The Lambertian assumption and Landsat data. , 1980 .

[23]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[24]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[25]  F. Médail,et al.  Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting Global Conservation Priorities , 1999 .

[26]  A. Shmida,et al.  Vegetation change along an altitudinal gradient on Mt Hermon, Israel-no evidence for discrete communities , 1993 .

[27]  G. Kattan,et al.  Bird diversity along elevational gradients in the Andes of Colombia: area and mass effects , 2004 .

[28]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[29]  Peter V. August,et al.  The Influence of Geomorphological Heterogeneity on Biodiversity : II . A Landscape Perspective , 2007 .

[30]  Narayani Barve,et al.  Assessing Biodiversity from Space: an Example from the Western Ghats, India , 2002 .

[31]  J. Izco.  Types of rarity of plant communities , 1998 .

[32]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Influence of Geomorphological Heterogeneity on Biodiversity  II. A Landscape Perspective , 1998 .

[33]  C. McCain.  The mid‐domain effect applied to elevational gradients: species richness of small mammals in Costa Rica , 2004 .

[34]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[35]  P. Keddy,et al.  Prediction of Rarities from Habitat Variables: Coastal Plain Plants on Nova Scotian Lakeshores , 1992 .

[36]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[37]  G. C. Stevens.  The Elevational Gradient in Altitudinal Range: An Extension of Rapoport's Latitudinal Rule to Altitude , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Allen H Hurlbert,et al.  The Effect of Energy and Seasonality on Avian Species Richness and Community Composition , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Colwell,et al.  The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  Alicia K. Birky,et al.  NDVI and a simple model of deciduous forest seasonal dynamics , 2001 .

[41]  C. Lauver,et al.  A hierarchical classification of Landsat TM imagery to identify natural grassland areas and rare species habitat , 1993 .

[42]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Elevation gradients of species‐density: historical and prospective views , 2001 .

[43]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Nonbiological Gradients in Species Richness and a Spurious Rapoport Effect , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Jarrod Moss,et al.  Patterns of ant species richness along elevational gradients in an arid ecosystem , 2003 .

[45]  C. Tucker,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of primary production , 1986 .

[46]  Brent N. Holben,et al.  Accuracy of the AVHRR vegetation index as a predictor of biomass, primary productivity and net CO2 flux , 1989, Vegetatio.

[47]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[48]  Rebecca J. Rowe,et al.  Elevational gradient analyses and the use of historical museum specimens: a cautionary tale , 2005 .

[49]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[50]  Thomas W. Gillespie,et al.  PREDICTING WOODY‐PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN TROPICAL DRY FORESTS: A CASE STUDY FROM SOUTH FLORIDA, USA , 2005 .

[51]  D. Janzen.  Sweep Samples of Tropical Foliage Insects: Effects of Seasons, Vegetation Types, Elevation, Time of Day, and Insularity , 1973 .

[52]  J. Keeley,et al.  Species–area relationships in Mediterranean‐climate plant communities , 2003 .

[53]  Richard Field,et al.  Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water-energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography , 2000 .

[54]  Paul H. Williams.  Some properties of rarity scores used in site quality assessment , 2000 .

[55]  D. Lobell,et al.  Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: precision and accuracy of spectral mixture analysis and the normalized difference vegetation index. , 2000 .

[56]  J. Grytnes,et al.  Distribution of vascular plant species richness and endemic richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient in Nepal , 2002 .

[57]  K. McGwire,et al.  Patterns of floristic richness in vegetation communities of California: regional scale analysis with multi-temporal NDVI , 2004 .

[58]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  On the relationship of NDVI with leaf area index in a deciduous forest site , 2005 .

[60]  Scott A. Lassau,et al.  Using high‐resolution multi‐spectral imagery to estimate habitat complexity in open‐canopy forests: can we predict ant community patterns? , 2005 .

[61]  Michael Hoffmann,et al.  Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  C. Rahbek.  The Relationship Among Area, Elevation, And Regional Species Richness In Neotropical Birds , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[63]  David Riaño,et al.  Assessment of different topographic corrections in Landsat-TM data for mapping vegetation types (2003) , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[64]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Interannual variability of NDVI and species richness in Kenya , 2002 .