Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients

OBJECTIVES To assess the influence of stage at breast cancer diagnosis, tumour biology, and treatment on survival in contemporary times of better (neo-)adjuvant systemic therapy. DESIGN Prospective nationwide population based study. SETTING Nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. PARTICIPANTS Female patients with primary breast cancer diagnosed between 1999 and 2012 (n=173,797), subdivided into two time cohorts on the basis of breast cancer diagnosis: 1999-2005 (n=80,228) and 2006-12 (n=93,569). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Relative survival was compared between the two cohorts. Influence of traditional prognostic factors on overall mortality was analysed with Cox regression for each cohort separately. RESULTS Compared with 1999-2005, patients from 2006-12 had smaller (≤ T1 65% (n=60,570) v 60% (n=48,031); P<0.001), more often lymph node negative (N0 68% (n=63,544) v 65% (n=52,238); P<0.001) tumours, but they received more chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy (neo-adjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy 60% (n=56,402) v 53% (n=42,185); P<0.001). Median follow-up was 9.8 years for 1999-2005 and 3.9 years for 2006-12. The relative five year survival rate in 2006-12 was 96%, improved in all tumour and nodal stages compared with 1999-2005, and 100% in tumours ≤ 1 cm. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age and tumour type, overall mortality was decreased by surgery (especially breast conserving), radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Mortality increased with progressing tumour size in both cohorts (2006-12 T1c v T1a: hazard ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 1.78), but without a significant difference in invasive breast cancers until 1 cm (2006-12 T1b v T1a: hazard ratio 1.04, 0.88 to 1.22), and independently with progressing number of positive lymph nodes (2006-12 N1 v N0: 1.25, 1.17 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Tumour stage at diagnosis of breast cancer still influences overall survival significantly in the current era of effective systemic therapy. Diagnosis of breast cancer at an early tumour stage remains vital.

[1]  P. Bult,et al.  Breast cancer prognosis and occult lymph node metastases, isolated tumor cells, and micrometastases. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  M. Piccart,et al.  Maastricht Delphi consensus on event definitions for classification of recurrence in breast cancer research. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  T. Ruers,et al.  [Summary of the guideline 'Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer.' Dutch Work Group 'Sentinel Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer']. , 2000, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[4]  C. Carter,et al.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases , 1989, Cancer.

[5]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Major Changes in Chemotherapy Regimens Administered to Breast Cancer Patients During 2000–2008 in the Netherlands , 2013, The breast journal.

[6]  T J Cole,et al.  Setting number of decimal places for reporting risk ratios: rule of four , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  A. Giuliano,et al.  Evaluation of the stage IB designation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in breast cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Sally Hunsberger,et al.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Gerrit Draisma,et al.  The effects of population‐based mammography screening starting between age 40 and 50 in the presence of adjuvant systemic therapy , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[11]  J. Wesseling,et al.  Implementation of trastuzumab in conjunction with adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer in the Netherlands , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[12]  S. Jaffer,et al.  Occult Axillary Node Metastases in Breast Cancer are Prognostically Significant: Results in 368 Node Negative Patients With 20-year Follow-up , 2008, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[13]  Greg Yothers,et al.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Helena Carreira,et al.  Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) , 2015, The Lancet.

[15]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[16]  Paul W Dickman,et al.  Regression models for relative survival , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  L. Tabár,et al.  Real and artificial controversies in breast cancer screening , 2013 .

[18]  Jong-Hyeon Jeong,et al.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Implementation of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands. , 2008, European journal of cancer.