10-Year Survival of Acetabular Reinforcement Rings/Cages for Complex Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction : Acetabular reinforcement rings/ cages (AR) are commonly used for reconstruction of bone defects in complex hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the 10-year survival rate of Ganz reinforcement rings and Burch-Schneider cages used in a single institution. Material and Methods : Between September 1999 and June 2002 all ARs, implanted in one institution, were identified. All patients had regular clinical and radiographic follow-up and were included in this study. Their prospectively collected clinical and radiographic data was retrospectively analyzed. In case of death before the 10-year follow-up examination, patient’s families or their general practitioner was contacted by telephone. The main outcome measures were survival of the ARs and kind of revision surgery. Results : The 10-year survival rate was 77.7%. At 10-year follow-up, 5/60 (8,3%) patients could not be located and had to be excluded therefore. 27/55 (49,1%) were dead, whereof 22 had no revision of the ARs before death (after a mean of 66 months; range: 0 - 123). Of the remaining 28/55 (50,9%) patients, 23 patients (24 ARs) had no revision of the ARs. Conclusion : Despite the high mortality rate of this study’s collective, ARs for complex primary or revision total hip arthroplasty provided predictable long term results. Level of Evidence : Clinical investigation.

[1]  O. Bortolami,et al.  A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  G. Grammatopoulos,et al.  The Burch-Schneider Cage: 9-Year Survival in Paprosky Type 3 Acetabular Defects. Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up , 2012, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[3]  F. Anglés,et al.  Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. , 2010, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[4]  M. Itoman,et al.  Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[5]  R. Bertelli,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch–Schneider anti-protrusio cage , 2009, La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento.

[6]  D. Regis,et al.  Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  U. Schlegel,et al.  [Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases]. , 2008, Der Orthopade.

[8]  R. Ganz,et al.  Die Pfannendachschale in der Revisions-Arthroplastik der Hüfte , 2008 .

[9]  F. Ennas,et al.  Ganz reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: indications and medium-term results. , 2004, La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento.

[10]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  R. Ganz,et al.  [Hooked roof cup in revision of difficult loose hip prosthesis cups. Results after a minimum of 10 years]. , 2001, Der Orthopade.

[12]  P. Clavert,et al.  [Reconstruction by graft and reinforcement device in severe aseptic acetabular loosening: 10 years survivorship analysis]. , 2001, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[13]  R. Jakob,et al.  The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  P. Böhm,et al.  Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years. , 1999, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  R. Ganz,et al.  Acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: results of the acetabular reinforcement ring with hook. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  M. Müller,et al.  The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  F. Kandziora,et al.  [Acetabular reconstruction using acetabular reinforcement rings]. , 1998, Der Orthopade.

[18]  K. Samuelson,et al.  Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  D. Berry Acetabular anti-protrusio rings and cages in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1995, Seminars in arthroplasty.

[20]  R. Ganz,et al.  [The acetabular roof cup in revision arthroplasty of the hip]. , 1993, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[21]  M. Müller,et al.  Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. , 1992, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume.