The influence of granular materials on the operation and membrane fouling characteristics of submerged MBRs

Abstract Aeration to mitigate membrane fouling accounts for the largest fraction of energy consumed in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). To reduce the energy consumed during MBR operation, alternative methods must be developed to control membrane fouling. Granules should be introduced into submerged MBRs to mitigate membrane fouling due to their mechanical cleaning effect on the membrane surface. This study assessed the possible reduction in aeration for submerged MBRs through introducing granules and investigated membrane fouling characteristics from using granules. Two bench-scale MBRs operated in parallel with synthetic wastewater, and granules were introduced into one MBR. The MBR with granules operated stably even after aeration was reduced by 50%. Reversible fouling was almost entirely controlled through the introduction of granules. However, the granules promoted irreversible fouling due to cake elimination, which acted as a dynamic filter. The overall benefit from granules was apparent; although, reversible fouling dominated in the absence of granules. The foulant characteristics differed with granule use. These characteristic changes were also explained by the absence of the dynamic filtration effect.

[1]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[2]  Anja Drews,et al.  Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures , 2010 .

[3]  Jianrong Chen,et al.  New insights into membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor based on characterization of cake sludge and bulk sludge. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Ke Xu,et al.  Effect of carriers on sludge characteristics and mitigation of membrane fouling in attached-growth membrane bioreactor. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Chris Thoeye,et al.  Energy audit of a full scale MBR system , 2010 .

[6]  Xia Huang,et al.  Mechanism of membrane fouling control by suspended carriers in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2008 .

[7]  Xinying Zhang,et al.  Formation of dynamic membrane in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. , 2010 .

[8]  Wenshan Guo,et al.  Evaluation of a novel sponge-submerged membrane bioreactor (SSMBR) for sustainable water reclamation. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[9]  S. Vigneswaran,et al.  Combined effect of air and mechanical scouring of membranes for fouling reduction in submerged membrane reactor , 2012 .

[10]  Le Jin,et al.  Fouling control mechanism by suspended biofilm carriers addition in submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors , 2013 .

[11]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: Relation to membrane fouling. , 2009, Water research.

[12]  P Cornel,et al.  Effect of mechanical cleaning with granular material on the permeability of submerged membranes in the MBR process. , 2010, Water research.

[13]  H. Ngo,et al.  Roles of polyurethane foam in aerobic moving and fixed bed bioreactors. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Daniel Prats,et al.  Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR , 2010 .

[15]  Chung‐Hak Lee,et al.  Factors affecting filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor. , 2006, Water research.

[16]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Membrane fouling control in a submerged membrane bioreactor with porous, flexible suspended carriers , 2006 .

[18]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[19]  Toshiro Yamada,et al.  Coupling of sequencing batch reactor and mesh filtration: operational parameters and wastewater treatment performance. , 2005, Water research.

[20]  T. Leiknes,et al.  The biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR)—a review , 2012 .

[21]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  An improved flux-step method to determine the critical flux and the critical flux for irreversibility in a membrane bioreactor , 2009 .

[22]  Simon Judd,et al.  The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR. , 2010, Water research.

[23]  V. Jegatheesan,et al.  Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[24]  K. Kimura,et al.  Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. , 2004, Water research.

[25]  P Cornel,et al.  Enhanced membrane bioreactor process without chemical cleaning. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Membrane Bioreactors in Waste Water Treatment – Status and Trends , 2010 .

[27]  T. Asano Water Reuse: Issues, Technologies, and Applications , 2007 .

[28]  Paolo Pavan,et al.  Operation and Maintenance of full-scale Municipal Membrane Biological Reactors: a detailed overview on a case study , 2007 .

[29]  K. Booksh,et al.  Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.