Does educational level influence the effects of smoking, alcohol, physical activity, and obesity on mortality? A prospective population study

Objectives: This study aims at examining whether the relation between established risk factors and mortality differs with socioeconomic status as measured by level of education. Methods: A population-based sample of 14,399 women and 16,236 men aged 20 - 93 years from Copenhagen was stratified into three educational levels measured as basic schooling, and the effect of smoking habits, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and body mass index, respectively, on mortality was assessed. Results: Those with the lowest level of education were most frequently heavy smokers, heavy drinkers, physically inactive, and obese. During a mean follow up of 16 years 10,952 subjects died. Compared with subjects with the lowest educational level, women with the highest educational level had a relative risk of 0.80 (95% CI; 0.70 - 0.91), and men of 0.71 (0.65 - 0.78). Heavy smoking compared with never smoking implied a more than twofold increased risk at all three educational levels among both men and women. The relation between alcohol intake and mortality was J-shaped on all three educational levels. There were decreasing risk functions describing the relations between physical activity and mortality on all three strata. Further, subjects who were either very lean or obese had increased risks of death compared with those of normal weight at all educational levels in both genders. Conclusions: The difference in distribution of the main known risk factors may be part of the explanation for the differences in mortality risk. However, these risk factors seem to influence mortality equally at different educational levels. Therefore, social inequalities in mortality do not seem to be explained only by differences in effect of lifestyle risk factors, but are also related to the social rank or unexamined factors within.

[1]  M. Marmot,et al.  Social inequalities in health: next questions and converging evidence. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[2]  C. Muntaner,et al.  Income Inequality, Social Cohesion, and Class Relations: A Critique of Wilkinson's Neo-Durkheimian Research Program , 1999, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[3]  M. Marmot,et al.  INEQUALITIES IN DEATH—SPECIFIC EXPLANATIONS OF A GENERAL PATTERN? , 1984, The Lancet.

[4]  M. Osler,et al.  Social differences in health in an affluent Danish county , 1998, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[5]  M. Marmot,et al.  Smoke intake among smokers is higher in lower socioeconomic groups , 2000, Tobacco control.

[6]  J. Salonen,et al.  Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Michael Marmot,et al.  Resource Reviews Social Determinants of Health , 2000 .

[8]  J M Lepkowski,et al.  Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[9]  M. T. Damsgaard,et al.  Socioeconomic position and smoking behaviour in Danish adults , 2001, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[10]  T. Christiansen,et al.  Inequalities in health: evidence from Denmark of the interaction of circumstances and health-related behaviour , 1999 .

[11]  M. Marmot,et al.  General explanations for social inequalities in health. , 1997, IARC scientific publications.

[12]  J. Vestbo,et al.  Predictors of smoking reduction and cessation in a cohort of danish moderate and heavy smokers. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[13]  J. Feinstein,et al.  The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. , 1993, The Milbank quarterly.

[14]  M J Shipley,et al.  Do socioeconomic differences in mortality persist after retirement? 25 Year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study , 1996, BMJ.

[15]  M. Kumari,et al.  Social determinants of von willebrand factor: the Whitehall II study. , 2000, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[16]  S. Macintyre,et al.  The Black Report and beyond: what are the issues? , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[17]  C. Muntaner Teaching social inequalities in health: barriers and opportunities. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[18]  Gower Street,et al.  Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study , 1991, The Lancet.

[19]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Socioeconomic determinants of health: Health inequalities: relative or absolute material standards? , 1997 .

[20]  T. Kristensen,et al.  Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[21]  V. Salomaa,et al.  Haemostatic and other cardiovascular risk factors, and socioeconomic status among middle-aged Finnish men and women. , 1995, International Journal of Epidemiology.