Problem Mapping for the Assessment of Technological Barriers in the Framework of Innovative Design

This paper discusses an approach that points out technological problems that may occur whilst designing emerging technologies. The shape of the problem maps, which are obtained as an output of the proposed approach, is compatible with inputs of OTSM or TRIZ problem solving processes used in innovative design. One of the standard ways of gathering knowledge and information (qualitative and quantitative) about new technologies is to elicit them from experts. Existing approaches may produce some biased knowledge. Indeed, a result of this approach is either over-optimism about emerging technologies or missed opportunities (stemming from pessimistic evaluation). We propose to reduce bias through a problem mapping approach that extracts and organizes expert knowledge in the shape of a network of interlinked contradictions. First, an overview of forecasting methods which apply S-shaped curves is presented. The concept of the S-curve being shaped by resource limitations is discussed. Some reasons behind the complexity of assessing resource limitations are proposed. Secondly, the concept of problem mapping is introduced. Some features of the practice of problem mapping are discussed. The third part examines how problem mapping can be purposefully applied for assessing technological barriers using examples from emerging energy conversion technology. Finally problem mapping is considered from the viewpoint of knowledge management, inventive problem solving, and decision making within the context of studying future technology and innovative design.

[1]  E. E. Scheuing New Product Management , 1974 .

[2]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Forecasting methods and applications. , 1979 .

[3]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[4]  Acknowledgements , 1992, Experimental Gerontology.

[5]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Science and technology roadmaps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[6]  J. Ord,et al.  Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners , 2002 .

[7]  Kenneth B. Kahn An exploratory investigation of new product forecasting practices , 2002 .

[8]  C. Benedetto,et al.  New Products Management (Управление новыми продуктами), 7th ed. , 2002 .

[9]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[10]  Petri Tapio,et al.  Disaggregative Policy Delphi: Using cluster analysis as a tool for systematic scenario formation , 2003 .

[11]  R. Kostoff,et al.  Disruptive technology roadmaps , 2004 .

[12]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution , 2004 .

[13]  A. Kameoka,et al.  A challenge of integrating technology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development and policymaking , 2004 .

[14]  Eric Schenk,et al.  Technology Policy and A-Synchronic Technologies: The Case of German High-Speed Trains , 2005 .

[15]  Roland De Guio,et al.  PROBLEMS OF FORECAST 1 , 2005 .

[16]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  On the efficiency of US electricity usage since 1900 , 2005 .

[17]  Michael Friedewald,et al.  Science and Technology Roadmapping for Policy Intelligence: Lessons for Future Projects , 2005 .

[18]  Dmitry Kucharavy,et al.  Problems of Forecast , 2005 .

[19]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Yihong Du,et al.  The Logistic Equation , 2006 .

[21]  Roland De Guio,et al.  A framework for OTSMTRIZ-based computer support to be used in complex problem management , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..