The spatial coding model of visual word identification.

Visual word identification requires readers to code the identity and order of the letters in a word and match this code against previously learned codes. Current models of this lexical matching process posit context-specific letter codes in which letter representations are tied to either specific serial positions or specific local contexts (e.g., letter clusters). The spatial coding model described here adopts a different approach to letter position coding and lexical matching based on context-independent letter representations. In this model, letter position is coded dynamically, with a scheme called spatial coding. Lexical matching is achieved via a method called superposition matching, in which input codes and learned codes are matched on the basis of the relative positions of their common letters. Simulations of the model illustrate its ability to explain a broad range of results from the masked form priming literature, as well as to capture benchmark findings from the unprimed lexical decision task.

[1]  P. Merikle,et al.  On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Clive Frankish,et al.  Short Article: Lexical and Sublexical Processes in the Perception of Transposed-Letter Anagrams , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[5]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[6]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[7]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Reading and the Mental Lexicon , 1991 .

[8]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[9]  I. Laka,et al.  Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words , 2009 .

[10]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  A Note on the Informativeness of Parts of Words , 1958 .

[11]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[12]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[13]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[15]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[16]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Chapter 21 Memory-addressing Mechanisms and Lexical Access , 1992 .

[17]  Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in visual word recognition: evidence from expert vocabularies , 2004, Cognition.

[18]  Kathleen Rastle,et al.  Visual Word Recognition , 2007, The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics.

[19]  Philip T. Smith,et al.  A connectionist model of visual-word recognition that accounts for interactions between mask size and word length , 1991 .

[20]  Carol Whitney,et al.  Investigations into the Neural Basis of Structured Representations , 2004 .

[21]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[23]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Neighborhood Effects Using a Partial Priming Methodology: Guessing or Activation? , 1998 .

[24]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[25]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[26]  G. McConkie,et al.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: II. Feedback, expectation, olfaction, illusions , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Simon Farrell,et al.  End Anchoring in Short-Term Order Memory. , 2009 .

[30]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[31]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[33]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On coding the position of letters in words: a test of two models. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[35]  Rebecca L. Johnson,et al.  The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea , 2007 .

[36]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .

[38]  Ken N. Seergobin,et al.  On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? , 1990 .

[39]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Learning Representations of Wordforms With Recurrent Networks: Comment on , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[43]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading , 2006 .

[44]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[45]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory , 2009, Brain and Language.

[46]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency , 2008 .

[47]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .

[48]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  D. Norris,et al.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[50]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Visual word recognition: the first half second , 2004, NeuroImage.

[51]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[52]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[53]  J. Bowers,et al.  Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .

[54]  S. Andrews Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[55]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[57]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Inverse discrimination time as a perceptual distance for alphabetic characters , 2004 .

[58]  M. Taft,et al.  Lack of Phonological Mediation in a Semantic Categorization Task , 1998 .

[59]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .

[60]  M. Page,et al.  Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[61]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming , 1997, Cognition.

[62]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  A fundamental limitation of the conjunctive codes learned in PDP models of cognition: comment on Botvinick and Plaut (2006). , 2009, Psychological review.

[64]  K I Forster,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[65]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[66]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.

[67]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[68]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique , 1998, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[69]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[70]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[72]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A single-system account of semantic and lexical deficits in five semantic dementia patients , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[74]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition , 2003 .

[75]  C. Davis N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[76]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Masked form priming with extreme transposition , 2008 .

[77]  Clive Frankish,et al.  SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams , 2007 .

[78]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Sequence Encoders Enable Large-Scale Lexical Modeling: Reply to Bowers and Davis (2009) , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[79]  Ram Frost,et al.  Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .

[80]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Are There Lexicons? , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[81]  David A. Balota,et al.  Attentional Control and Flexible Lexical Processing : Explorations of the Magic Moment of Word Recognition , 2007 .

[82]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Identification, localization, and “iconic memory”: An evaluation of the bar-probe task , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[83]  K I Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[84]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[85]  MICHAEL P. A. PAGE,et al.  Modelling the Perception of Musical Sequences with Self-organizing Neural Networks , 1994, Connect. Sci..

[86]  Jason R. Perry,et al.  An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming , 2008 .

[87]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[88]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Competitive Learning: From Interactive Activation to Adaptive Resonance , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[89]  Eddy J. Davelaar,et al.  Sequential Retrieval and Inhibition of Parallel (Re)Activated Representations: A Neurocomputational Comparison of Competitive Queuing and Resampling Models , 2007, Adapt. Behav..

[90]  Laurie S. Glezer,et al.  Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2009, Neuron.

[91]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Progress in Theoretical Biology , 2012 .

[92]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[93]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[94]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[95]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological priming without morphological relationship , 2003 .

[96]  S. M. Chambers Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .

[97]  S. Andrews Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .

[98]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. , 2012 .

[99]  K. Rayner,et al.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[100]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[101]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[102]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[103]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[104]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Precision of position signals for letters , 2009, Vision Research.

[105]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[106]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .

[107]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent , 2006 .

[108]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[109]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[110]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .

[111]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. , 2009, Psychological review.

[112]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[113]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[114]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[115]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[116]  C. Davis,et al.  More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[117]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Word-Specific Knowledge, Word-Recognition Strategies, and Spelling Ability , 1993 .

[118]  C. P. Whaley Word–nonword classification time. , 1978 .

[119]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. , 1994 .

[120]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[121]  W. Estes,et al.  Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations , 1976 .

[122]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[123]  S. Lupker,et al.  Sandwich priming: a method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[124]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[125]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Language of Thought , 1980 .

[126]  W S Murray,et al.  Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. , 2004, Psychological review.

[127]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects , 2008 .

[128]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[129]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[130]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[131]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words , 2005, Cognition.

[132]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[133]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Challenging the widespread assumption that connectionism and distributed representations go hand-in-hand , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[134]  S. Grossberg Contour Enhancement , Short Term Memory , and Constancies in Reverberating Neural Networks , 1973 .

[135]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[136]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[137]  Rebecca L Johnson,et al.  Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[138]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[139]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[140]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. , 2009, Psychological review.

[141]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[142]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited , 2010 .

[143]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader? , 2010 .

[144]  D. Pelli,et al.  Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.

[145]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  STORE working memory networks for storage and recall of arbitrary temporal sequences , 1994, Biological Cybernetics.

[146]  Sally Andrews,et al.  From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing , 2006 .

[147]  D. Rumelhart,et al.  Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. , 1974, Psychological review.

[148]  J. Bowers,et al.  Is speech perception modular or interactive? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[149]  H. Stadthagen-González,et al.  The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[150]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[151]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[152]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A Theory of Human Memory: Self-Organization and Performance of Sensory-Motor Codes, Maps, and Plans , 1982 .

[153]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Raeding Wrods With Jubmled Lettres , 2006, Psychological science.

[154]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[155]  S. Grossberg Some Networks That Can Learn, Remember, and Reproduce any Number of Complicated Space-Time Patterns, I , 1969 .

[156]  D. Bub,et al.  Features for Identification of Uppercase and Lowercase Letters , 2008, Psychological science.

[157]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[158]  Herbert Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings , 1971 .

[159]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  Transposed-letter priming effects with masked subset primes: A re-examination of the “relative position priming constraint” , 2012 .

[160]  G. Altmann,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2007 .

[161]  S. Andrews,et al.  Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[162]  K. Rayner Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.

[163]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[164]  K. Forster,et al.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[165]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .