The spatial coding model of visual word identification.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Merikle,et al. On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.
[2] Marilyn Jager Adams,et al. Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.
[3] Clive Frankish,et al. Short Article: Lexical and Sublexical Processes in the Perception of Transposed-Letter Anagrams , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[4] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.
[5] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[6] D. Norris,et al. The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.
[7] Marcus Taft,et al. Reading and the Mental Lexicon , 1991 .
[8] S. Lupker,et al. Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[9] I. Laka,et al. Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words , 2009 .
[10] Jerome S. Bruner,et al. A Note on the Informativeness of Parts of Words , 1958 .
[11] Stephen Grossberg,et al. A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..
[12] Sally Andrews,et al. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .
[13] Dennis Norris,et al. Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[14] Colin J. Davis,et al. The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .
[15] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .
[16] Kenneth I. Forster,et al. Chapter 21 Memory-addressing Mechanisms and Lexical Access , 1992 .
[17] Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez,et al. Age-of-acquisition effects in visual word recognition: evidence from expert vocabularies , 2004, Cognition.
[18] Kathleen Rastle,et al. Visual Word Recognition , 2007, The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics.
[19] Philip T. Smith,et al. A connectionist model of visual-word recognition that accounts for interactions between mask size and word length , 1991 .
[20] Carol Whitney,et al. Investigations into the Neural Basis of Structured Representations , 2004 .
[21] H. Rubenstein,et al. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .
[22] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[23] S. Liversedge,et al. Neighborhood Effects Using a Partial Priming Methodology: Guessing or Activation? , 1998 .
[24] Paul W. B. Atkins,et al. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .
[25] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .
[26] G. McConkie,et al. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[27] Stephen Grossberg,et al. Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: II. Feedback, expectation, olfaction, illusions , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.
[28] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[29] Simon Farrell,et al. End Anchoring in Short-Term Order Memory. , 2009 .
[30] Michael J Cortese,et al. Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[31] Dennis Norris,et al. The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.
[32] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[33] Manuel Perea,et al. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[34] Jonathan Grainger,et al. On coding the position of letters in words: a test of two models. , 2011, Experimental psychology.
[35] Rebecca L. Johnson,et al. The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea , 2007 .
[36] C. Whitney. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[37] M. Zorzi,et al. Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .
[38] Ken N. Seergobin,et al. On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? , 1990 .
[39] Keith Rayner,et al. Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al. Learning Representations of Wordforms With Recurrent Networks: Comment on , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[41] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[42] J. Cowan,et al. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.
[43] K. Rayner,et al. Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading , 2006 .
[44] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[45] Marc Brysbaert,et al. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory , 2009, Brain and Language.
[46] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency , 2008 .
[47] Robin L. Hill,et al. Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .
[48] Dennis Norris,et al. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[49] D. Norris,et al. Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.
[50] Morten L. Kringelbach,et al. Visual word recognition: the first half second , 2004, NeuroImage.
[51] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.
[52] Manuel Perea,et al. The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.
[53] J. Bowers,et al. Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .
[54] S. Andrews. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .
[55] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[56] B. Bergum,et al. Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .
[57] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Inverse discrimination time as a perceptual distance for alphabetic characters , 2004 .
[58] M. Taft,et al. Lack of Phonological Mediation in a Semantic Categorization Task , 1998 .
[59] Victoria A. Fromkin,et al. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .
[60] M. Page,et al. Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[61] Manuel Perea,et al. Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming , 1997, Cognition.
[62] Keith Rayner,et al. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[63] Markus F. Damian,et al. A fundamental limitation of the conjunctive codes learned in PDP models of cognition: comment on Botvinick and Plaut (2006). , 2009, Psychological review.
[64] K I Forster,et al. The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[65] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[66] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.
[67] Michael J Cortese,et al. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[68] Manuel Perea,et al. Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique , 1998, Language and Cognitive Processes.
[69] G. E. MacKinnon,et al. Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .
[70] Jeffrey S Bowers,et al. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[71] Marco Zorzi,et al. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.
[72] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[73] James L. McClelland,et al. A single-system account of semantic and lexical deficits in five semantic dementia patients , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[74] Colin J. Davis,et al. Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition , 2003 .
[75] C. Davis. N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[76] Kenneth I. Forster,et al. Masked form priming with extreme transposition , 2008 .
[77] Clive Frankish,et al. SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams , 2007 .
[78] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Sequence Encoders Enable Large-Scale Lexical Modeling: Reply to Bowers and Davis (2009) , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[79] Ram Frost,et al. Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .
[80] Max Coltheart,et al. Are There Lexicons? , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[81] David A. Balota,et al. Attentional Control and Flexible Lexical Processing : Explorations of the Magic Moment of Word Recognition , 2007 .
[82] Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al. Identification, localization, and “iconic memory”: An evaluation of the bar-probe task , 1981, Memory & cognition.
[83] K I Forster,et al. No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[84] M. Sigman,et al. Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .
[85] MICHAEL P. A. PAGE,et al. Modelling the Perception of Musical Sequences with Self-organizing Neural Networks , 1994, Connect. Sci..
[86] Jason R. Perry,et al. An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming , 2008 .
[87] S. Lupker,et al. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[88] Stephen Grossberg,et al. Competitive Learning: From Interactive Activation to Adaptive Resonance , 1987, Cogn. Sci..
[89] Eddy J. Davelaar,et al. Sequential Retrieval and Inhibition of Parallel (Re)Activated Representations: A Neurocomputational Comparison of Competitive Queuing and Resampling Models , 2007, Adapt. Behav..
[90] Laurie S. Glezer,et al. Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2009, Neuron.
[91] Robert Rosen,et al. Progress in Theoretical Biology , 2012 .
[92] Michael J Cortese,et al. Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[93] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[94] D J Mewhort,et al. Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.
[95] J. Segui,et al. Morphological priming without morphological relationship , 2003 .
[96] S. M. Chambers. Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .
[97] S. Andrews. Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .
[98] Stephen Monsell,et al. The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. , 2012 .
[99] K. Rayner,et al. Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[100] A. Jacobs,et al. Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[101] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .
[102] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[103] S. Lupker,et al. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .
[104] Gordon E. Legge,et al. Precision of position signals for letters , 2009, Vision Research.
[105] G. Humphreys,et al. Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .
[106] A. Jacobs,et al. Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .
[107] Marc Brysbaert,et al. The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent , 2006 .
[108] Manuel Carreiras,et al. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? , 2006, Experimental psychology.
[109] Lori L. Holt,et al. Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[110] A. Jacobs,et al. Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .
[111] Dennis Norris,et al. Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. , 2009, Psychological review.
[112] K. Forster,et al. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .
[113] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[114] D Norris,et al. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[115] J Grainger,et al. The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.
[116] C. Davis,et al. More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[117] V. M. Holmes,et al. Word-Specific Knowledge, Word-Recognition Strategies, and Spelling Ability , 1993 .
[118] C. P. Whaley. Word–nonword classification time. , 1978 .
[119] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. , 1994 .
[120] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. , 2008, Experimental psychology.
[121] W. Estes,et al. Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations , 1976 .
[122] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.
[123] S. Lupker,et al. Sandwich priming: a method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[124] Sachiko Kinoshita,et al. Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .
[125] J. Fodor,et al. The Language of Thought , 1980 .
[126] W S Murray,et al. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. , 2004, Psychological review.
[127] Manuel Perea,et al. Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects , 2008 .
[128] J. Grainger,et al. Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[129] A. Jacobs,et al. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[130] Philip T Quinlan,et al. Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.
[131] Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al. Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words , 2005, Cognition.
[132] David A. Balota,et al. Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .
[133] Jeffrey S Bowers,et al. Challenging the widespread assumption that connectionism and distributed representations go hand-in-hand , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[134] S. Grossberg. Contour Enhancement , Short Term Memory , and Constancies in Reverberating Neural Networks , 1973 .
[135] Jeffrey S Bowers,et al. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[136] Ton Dijkstra,et al. Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[137] Rebecca L Johnson,et al. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[138] J Grainger,et al. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.
[139] E. Averbach,et al. Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .
[140] Jeffrey S Bowers,et al. On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. , 2009, Psychological review.
[141] J. Grainger,et al. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[142] Colin J. Davis,et al. SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited , 2010 .
[143] Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al. Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader? , 2010 .
[144] D. Pelli,et al. Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.
[145] Stephen Grossberg,et al. STORE working memory networks for storage and recall of arbitrary temporal sequences , 1994, Biological Cybernetics.
[146] Sally Andrews,et al. From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing , 2006 .
[147] D. Rumelhart,et al. Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. , 1974, Psychological review.
[148] J. Bowers,et al. Is speech perception modular or interactive? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[149] H. Stadthagen-González,et al. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity , 2006, Behavior research methods.
[150] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[151] D. Balota,et al. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[152] Stephen Grossberg,et al. A Theory of Human Memory: Self-Organization and Performance of Sensory-Motor Codes, Maps, and Plans , 1982 .
[153] Sarah J. White,et al. Raeding Wrods With Jubmled Lettres , 2006, Psychological science.
[154] Michael J Cortese,et al. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[155] S. Grossberg. Some Networks That Can Learn, Remember, and Reproduce any Number of Complicated Space-Time Patterns, I , 1969 .
[156] D. Bub,et al. Features for Identification of Uppercase and Lowercase Letters , 2008, Psychological science.
[157] Keith Rayner,et al. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[158] Herbert Rubenstein,et al. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings , 1971 .
[159] Colin J. Davis,et al. Transposed-letter priming effects with masked subset primes: A re-examination of the “relative position priming constraint” , 2012 .
[160] G. Altmann,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2007 .
[161] S. Andrews,et al. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[162] K. Rayner. Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.
[163] M. Carreiras,et al. Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[164] K. Forster,et al. Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.
[165] J. Grainger,et al. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .