Electrical interactions among real cardiac cells and cell models in a linear strand.

Previous work with model systems for action potential conduction have been restricted to conduction between two real cells or conduction between a model cell and a real cell. The inclusion of additional elements to make a linear strand has allowed us to investigate the interactions between cells at a higher level of complexity. When, in the simplest case of a linear strand of three elements, the conductance between elements 2 and 3( G C2) is varied, this affects the success or failure of propagation between elements 1 and 2 (coupled by G C1) as well as the success or failure of propagation between elements 2 and 3. Several major features were illustrated. 1) When G C1 was only slightly greater than the coupling conductance required for successful propagation between a model cell and a real cell, addition of a third element of the strand either prevented conduction from element 1 to element 2 (when G C2 was high) or allowed conduction from element 1 to element 2 but not conduction from element 2 to element 3 (when G C2 was low). 2) For higher levels of G C1, there was an allowable "window" of values of G C2 for successful conduction from element 1 through to element 3. The size of this allowable window of G C2 values increased with increasing values of G C1, and this increase was produced by increases in the upper bound of G C2 values. 3) When the size of the central element of the strand was reduced, this facilitated conduction through the strand, increasing the range of the allowable window of G C2 values. The overall success or failure of conduction through a structure of cells that has a spatially inhomogeneous distribution of coupling conductances cannot be predicted simply by the average or the minimum value of coupling conductance but may depend on the actual spatial distribution of these conductances.

[1]  J. Cordeiro,et al.  Conduction between isolated rabbit Purkinje and ventricular myocytes coupled by a variable resistance. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[2]  J. L. Hill,et al.  Interaction of Acidosis and Increased Extracellular Potassium on Action Potential Characteristics and Conduction in Guinea Pig Ventricular Muscle , 1982, Circulation research.

[3]  A. Wilde,et al.  Morphology of electrophysiologically identified junctions between Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle in rabbit and pig hearts. , 1991, Circulation research.

[4]  R. Kumar,et al.  Modulation of propagation from an ectopic focus by electrical load and by extracellular potassium , 1997 .

[5]  H. Jongsma,et al.  Model clamp and its application to synchronization of rabbit sinoatrial node cells. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  R Wilders,et al.  Experimental model for an ectopic focus coupled to ventricular cells. , 1996, Circulation.

[7]  H. Jongsma,et al.  Electrical interactions between a rabbit atrial cell and a nodal cell model. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  H. Jongsma,et al.  Modulating L-type calcium current affects discontinuous cardiac action potential conduction. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Ronald Wilders,et al.  Pacemaker Synchronization of Electrically Coupled Rabbit Sinoatrial Node Cells , 1998, The Journal of general physiology.

[10]  M Zaniboni,et al.  Electrotonic modulation of electrical activity in rabbit atrioventricular node myocytes. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  M. Boyett,et al.  Modulation of pacemaker activity of sinoatrial node cells by electrical load imposed by an atrial cell model. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  R Wilders,et al.  Action potential conduction between a ventricular cell model and an isolated ventricular cell. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[13]  M S Spach,et al.  Initiating Reentry: , 1994, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  R. W. Joyner,et al.  Unidirectional block between isolated rabbit ventricular cells coupled by a variable resistance. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Capelle,et al.  Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. 'Zigzag' course of activation. , 1993, Circulation.

[16]  M. Janse,et al.  Fractionated electrograms in dilated cardiomyopathy: origin and relation to abnormal conduction. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  C. Luo,et al.  A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. II. Afterdepolarizations, triggered activity, and potentiation. , 1994, Circulation research.

[18]  M. Kameyama,et al.  An improved method for isolating cardiac myocytes useful for patch-clamp studies. , 1990, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[19]  Y Rudy,et al.  Ionic mechanisms of propagation in cardiac tissue. Roles of the sodium and L-type calcium currents during reduced excitability and decreased gap junction coupling. , 1997, Circulation research.

[20]  R. W. Joyner,et al.  Electrotonic influences on action potentials from isolated ventricular cells. , 1990, Circulation research.

[21]  R. W. Joyner,et al.  Variations in the functional electrical coupling between the subendocardial Purkinje and ventricular layers of the canine left ventricle. , 1985, Circulation research.

[22]  C. Luo,et al.  A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. , 1994, Circulation research.

[23]  Action potential conduction between guinea pig ventricular cells can be modulated by calcium current. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  R. W. Joyner,et al.  Discontinuous conduction at Purkinje-ventricular muscle junction. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.