An integrative theory of strategic quality management: a cost-benefit framework for evaluating quality improvement programmes†

Most American firms are concerned with improving their quality. Unfortunately, the current literature does not give a comprehensive theoretical model in order to evaluate each recommendation economically. Because of the lack of a theoretical model and the complexity of quality improvement systems, integrative efforts coordinating marketing and production have been largely ineffective in the strategies of firms, since they have not been subject to traditional cost-benefit analysis. This study develops an integrative strategic quality management theory and a cost-benefit model which put quality improvement programmes into the traditional decision-making framework. Conclusions of this study suggest that quality improvement programmes benefits are cumulative and costs are static. Consequently, evaluation of quality improvement programmes must be dynamic and integrative if they are to be properly evaluated.

[1]  John D. Blair,et al.  Quality circles and production/operations management: Concerns and caveats , 1983 .

[2]  Juanita M. Kreps Automation and employment , 1964 .

[3]  Wickham Skinner,et al.  Manufacturing: The Formidable Competitive Weapon , 1985 .

[4]  Joseph G. Voelkel,et al.  Guide to Quality Control , 1982 .

[5]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[6]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing , 1984 .

[7]  I. Levin,et al.  Estimating Price-Quality Tradeoffs Using Comparative Judgments , 1984 .

[8]  Barrie Dale,et al.  The Management of Quality:: A Top Management View , 1984 .

[9]  T. Hill Manufacturing Strategy: The Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Function , 1985 .

[10]  H. Guitton,et al.  Distributed Lags and Investment Analysis , 1955 .

[11]  R. Bellman,et al.  DISTRIBUTED LAGS: A SURVEY , 1967 .

[12]  J. Hackman,et al.  A New Strategy for Job Enrichment , 1975 .

[13]  E. Lawler,et al.  Quality circles after the fad. , 1985, Harvard business review.

[14]  R. D. Buzzell,et al.  Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses , 1983 .

[15]  W. Deming Quality, productivity, and competitive position , 1982 .

[16]  William G. Hunter,et al.  Economic Selection of Quality Manufactured Product , 1984 .

[17]  M. Holbrook Integrating Compositional and Decompositional Analyses to Represent the Intervening Role of Perceptions in Evaluative Judgments , 1981 .

[18]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[19]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[20]  Richard Klavans,et al.  FORMULATING A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY , 1985 .

[21]  F. Leonard,et al.  The Incline of Quality , 1982 .

[22]  J. Quelch,et al.  Quality Is More than Making a Good Product , 1983 .

[23]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Quality assurance information systems for factory automation , 1985 .

[24]  R. C. Stokes THE EFFECTS OF PRICE, PACKAGE DESIGN, AND BRAND FAMILIARITY ON PERCEIVED QUALITY. , 1974 .

[25]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Product quality: An important strategic weapon , 1984 .

[26]  Eitan Gerstner Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality? , 1985 .

[27]  G. Taguchi Quality engineering in japan , 1985 .