A framework to integrate the enterprise domain ontology and organizational change application domain

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a generalized framework that illustrates the potential for the resources, events and agents (REA) model to integrate business strategy and information systems planning. The essential point of connection, the business process, enables the REA to form a complementary platform to integrate strategic change information to support change strategies. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a case study to illustrate application of the framework. Findings – The framework illustrates how the expanding ontology and semantic granularity and scalability features of the REA enterprise domain ontology, support mapping a range of change strategies structured using Venkataraman's change framework. Research limitations/implications – This paper is exploratory in nature. The method uses existing case information, but the nature of the work does not lend itself to the traditional descriptive approach. Practical implications – Integration of business strategy and information systems planning is critical for organizational success. Poor integration between change initiatives and systems poses a challenge in implementing change strategies. Conceptual models that support change initiatives provide users an effective medium to use domain knowledge to support change strategies. Originality/value – The paper integrates existing concepts in the REA model (with some modification to the process view of the REA to adapt to multiple change initiatives). To the authors’ knowledge, there are no other papers that have offered a generalized framework for conceptualizing change initiatives of different levels.

[1]  J. Watkins Is a Step-by-Step Approach to Change a Viable Option for the U.K. Retail Banking Sector? , 2000 .

[2]  Marcia L. Weidenmier,et al.  Linking Business Processes and Transaction Cycles , 2004, J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Ron Weber,et al.  Ontological Issues in Accounting Information Systems , 2002 .

[4]  Mohan Nair Activity-Based Information Systems: An Executive's Guide to Implementation , 1999 .

[5]  D. Larcker,et al.  The Performance Effects of Process Management Techniques , 1997 .

[6]  Varun Grover,et al.  A Framework for Examining the Interface between Operations and Information Systems: Implications for Research in the New Millennium* , 1999 .

[7]  Varun Grover,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Planning: Planning System Dimensions, Internal Coalignment, and Implications for Planning Effectiveness , 1998 .

[8]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  PRIOR LITERATURE : CATEGORIZATION Identification of the Relevant Literature Base , 2007 .

[9]  Lawrence P. Grasso,et al.  Barriers to lean accounting , 2006 .

[10]  W. L. Currie,et al.  Revisiting management innovation and change programmes: strategic vision or tunnel vision? , 1999 .

[11]  Frances M. Hill,et al.  A descriptive and analytical model of organisational transformation , 2000 .

[12]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  A multi-layered ontology for comparing relationship semantics in conceptual models of databases , 2005, Appl. Ontology.

[13]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Semantic Granularity in Ontology-Driven Geographic Information Systems , 2002, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  Martin Hughes,et al.  The role of business process redesign in creating e-government in Ireland , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[15]  Rodney E. Smith,et al.  An Extension of the REA Framework to Support Balanced Scorecard Information Requirements , 2007, J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  M. Hammer,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1993 .

[17]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  An ontological analysis of the economic primitives of the extended-REA enterprise information architecture , 2002, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Cheryl L. Dunn,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems: A Pattern-Based Approach , 2003 .

[19]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Reinventing the CFO: Moving from Financial Management to Strategic Management , 1996 .

[20]  Gregory J. Gerard,et al.  The REA Pattern, Knowledge Structures, and Conceptual Modeling Performance , 2005, J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Factors Influencing the Role of Management Accounting in the Development of Performance Measures within Organizational Change Programs , 1998 .

[22]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies , 1993 .

[23]  William R. King,et al.  Integration Between Business Planning and Information Systems Planning: Validating a Stage Hypothesis , 1997 .

[24]  E. W. Schuster,et al.  An Introduction to Semantic Modeling for Logistical Systems , 2005 .

[25]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[26]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[27]  Ron Weber,et al.  Conceptual Modeling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2003, J. Database Manag..

[28]  Peter P. Chen The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[29]  George Joseph Understanding Management Accounting Techniques in the Context of Organizational Change: As Strategic Business Partners with a Responsibility to Improve Operations, Management Accountants Must Identify Techniques That Support Incremental Change and Help Transform Their Firm , 2006 .

[30]  Lars G. Hassel,et al.  Cost Accounting and Performance Measurement in a Just-in-Time Production Environment , 1999 .

[31]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Peter Rob,et al.  Database systems : design, implementation, and management , 2000 .

[33]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[34]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  Augmented Intensional Reasoning in Knowledge-Based Accounting Systems , 2000, J. Inf. Syst..