Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: The relative percentile method

Social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954) implies that it may be more efficacious for job performance raters to compare an employee to other employees rather than to use typical “absolute” rating standards. We assessed whether the incorporation of social comparisons into performance appraisals, using the relative percentile method (RPM), would predict criterion variance beyond that predicted by more traditional absolute ratings of performance. A sample (N=170) of managers involved in an assessment center was used, and the center provided criteria by which the relative criterion-related validity of social-comparative versus noncomparative (absolute) appraisals could be assessed. Overall, in consonance with a preponderance of earlier research, social-comparative (RPM) performance appraisals showed incremental criterion-related validity over traditional absolute performance appraisal methods. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[2]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Criterion models and construct validity for criteria. , 1973 .

[3]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION SCALES FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSES , 1977 .

[4]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. , 1979 .

[5]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Utility concepts in performance measurement , 1982 .

[6]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Estimation of standard deviations in utility analyses: An empirical test. , 1983 .

[7]  H. Bernardin,et al.  A Comparison of Rating Formats After Corrections for Attenuation , 1985 .

[8]  Robert L. Heneman.  The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[9]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[10]  Ralph A. Alexander,et al.  A COMPARISON OF CRITERIA FOR TEST VALIDATION: A META‐ANALYTIC INVESTIGATION , 1988 .

[11]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. , 1990 .

[12]  D. R. Ilgen,et al.  Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use? , 1993 .

[13]  D T Gilbert,et al.  When comparisons arise. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  William H. Bommer,et al.  ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[15]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings , 1996 .

[16]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  Criterion validation of two approaches to performance appraisal: The behavioral observation scale and the relative percentile method , 1996 .

[17]  Dirk D. Steiner,et al.  Common comparison standards : An approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance ratings , 1996 .

[18]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  Differences in Accuracy of Absolute and Comparative Performance Appraisal Methods , 1997 .

[19]  Dennis A. Joiner.  Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations , 2000 .

[20]  Winfred Arthur,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions: A Conceptual and Empirical Reexamination of the Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Paradox , 2000 .

[21]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Handbook of social comparison : theory and research , 2000 .

[22]  P. Bobko.  Correlation and Regression: Applications for Industrial Organizational Psychology and Management , 2001 .

[23]  R. Goffin,et al.  Can performance-feedback accuracy be improved? Effects of rater priming and rating-scale format on rating accuracy. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  R. Goffin,et al.  Improving the Validity of Letters of Recommendation: An Investigation of Three Standardized Reference Forms , 2001 .

[25]  Robert E. Wood,et al.  Self- versus others' ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. , 2002 .

[26]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center postexercise dimension ratings. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Angela M. Sternburgh,et al.  Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for Fairness and Organizational Justice , 2007 .

[29]  James M Olson,et al.  Relative versus absolute measures of explicit attitudes: Implications for predicting diverse attitude-relevant criteria. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.