The Emperor's Psycholinguistics

We discuss and debunk five common assumptions about the interrelation of semantics, syntax, and frequency during sentence processing. In the course of this, we explore the implications of the view that syntax is assigned as the last stage of comprehension rather than the first: Statistically based perceptual strategies propose an initial semantic representation, which then constrains the assignment of syntactic representations. This view accounts for a variety of facts, as well as suggesting some surprising new ones.

[1]  David R. Dowty.  On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’ , 1989 .

[2]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[3]  M. MacDonald.  Priming effects from gaps to antecedents , 1989 .

[4]  Bradley L. Pritchett.  Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .

[5]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[6]  C Clifton,et al.  The use of syntactic information in filling gaps , 1986, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[7]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[8]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Modifier Attachment in Sentence Parsing: Evidence from Dutch , 1996 .

[9]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1974 .

[10]  Paul Gorrell.  Syntax and Parsing , 1995 .

[11]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[12]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics , 1991 .

[13]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Testing theories of language processing: an empirical investigation of the on-line lexical decision task. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[15]  D. N. Perkins,et al.  The Limits of Intuition , 1977 .

[16]  Don C. Mitchell,et al.  Verb guidance and other lexical effects in parsing , 1989 .

[17]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Filters and Control , 1990 .

[19]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition , 1986 .

[20]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[21]  D Swinney,et al.  Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions; Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[22]  Paul Gorrell,et al.  Subcategorization and Sentence Processing , 1991 .

[23]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing , 1997 .

[24]  Carson T. Schütze,et al.  Processing empty categories: A parallel approach , 1994 .

[25]  E. Gibson,et al.  On the Strength of the Local Attachment Preference , 1997 .

[26]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On the order of words , 1982 .

[27]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[28]  J. W. Kimball,et al.  Predictive analysis and over-the-top parsing , 1975 .

[29]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  D-Theory: Talking about Talking about Trees , 1983, ACL.

[30]  M K Tanenhaus,et al.  A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[31]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse , 1988 .

[33]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .

[34]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Against lexical generation of syntax , 1989 .

[35]  D. Swinney,et al.  On the temporal course of gap-filling during comprehension of verbal passives , 1993, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[36]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[37]  David M. Perlmutter.  Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[38]  T. Bever,et al.  The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps , 1989 .

[39]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Natural language parsing: How can grammars help parsers? , 1985 .

[40]  Steven Abney,et al.  A computational model of human parsing , 1989 .

[41]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  The Case of Unaccusatives , 1988 .

[42]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach , 1989, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[43]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[44]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[45]  L Frazier,et al.  Construal: Overview, Motivation, and Some New Evidence , 1997, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension: unaccusatives in Spanish: unaccusatives in Spanish , 1997 .

[47]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[48]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[49]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  A unified theory of syntactic categories , 1985 .

[50]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Individual Differences and Probabilistic Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1995 .

[51]  Sanz Yagüe,et al.  Telicity, objects and the mapping onto predicate types : a cross-linguistic study of the role of syntax in processing , 1996 .

[52]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Differentiation and reduction in syntactic theory: A case study , 1990 .

[53]  C. Clifton,et al.  Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .

[54]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN? , 1980, Cognition.

[55]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[56]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Processing empty categories: A question of visibility. , 1993 .

[57]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  Deterministic parsing and linguistic explanation , 1985 .

[58]  G. Hickok,et al.  Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism , 1996, Cognition.

[59]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  L. Stowe.  Thematic Structures and Sentence Comprehension , 1989 .

[61]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  W D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process , 1975, Science.

[63]  J. Kimball.  Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[64]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .

[65]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Sentence processing without empty categories , 1991 .

[66]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Ambiguity in context , 1989 .

[67]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Implicit Arguments in Sentence Processing , 1995 .

[68]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish , 1988, Cognition.

[69]  T. Bever,et al.  Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension , 1988 .

[70]  C. Carrithers,et al.  The Psychological Reality of NP-Trace , 1990 .

[71]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Empty categories in sentence processing , 1989 .

[72]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[73]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Ambiguity in context: A reply , 1989 .

[74]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Interclause relations and clausal processing , 1978 .

[75]  A. Belletti.  The case of unacussatives , 1988 .

[76]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  Principle-Based Parsing , 1987 .

[77]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Memory, meaning, and syntax , 1980 .

[78]  Carol Lee Tenny,et al.  Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface , 1994 .

[79]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[80]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  The Use of Higher-Level Constraints in Monitoring for a Change in Speaker Demonstrates Functionally Distinct Levels of Representation in Discourse Comprehension. , 1991 .

[81]  T. Bever,et al.  Natural units of representation interact during sentence comprehension , 1982 .

[82]  J. Trueswell.  THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[83]  Nelson Correa,et al.  Empty Categories, Chain Binding, and Parsing , 1991 .

[84]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[85]  Fernando C. N. Pereira.  Natural language parsing: A new characterization of attachment preferences , 1985 .

[86]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Mechanisms of Sentence Processing: Assigning Roles to Constituents of Sentences , 1986 .

[87]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[88]  Steven P. Abney,et al.  Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. , 1991 .

[89]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[90]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives , 1985 .

[91]  Susan M. Garnsey.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of language: An introduction , 1993 .

[92]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  A Principle-Based System for Syntactic Analysis , 1991, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.