Continuance in Expertise-Sharing Networks : A Social Perspective

As engineering firms, R&D groups, and technical organizations recognize the centrality of their engineers’ expertise to their performance, they are widely investing in knowledge management (KM) initiatives. Contemporary KM initiatives increasingly include expertise-sharing networks that help answer questions about who knows what. These systems allow organizations to locate and leverage the specialized engineering and technical expertise that is held in the minds of dispersed individuals. However, stories of such expertise-sharing networks that languish from under-use and abandonment abound and the issue of continuance has received very little attention in prior research. In this paper, we explore this understudied issue. We develop a model of expertise-sharing network system continuance through a four-year observational study of 418 users of two such systems and then empirically test it using multiperiod data collected from 122 users of four such systems. The concept of irretrievable investments was used to guide theoretical development in the initial observational phase of the study. The study makes several unique theoretical contributions. First, it develops a model that illustrates how irretrievable postadoption investments (sunk costs) by individual users of expertise-network systems increase continuance. We empirically show that the model explains approximately half of the total variance in continuance intention. This model advances continuance beyond the traditional expectation-satisfaction model of initial adoption to more advanced postadoption stages of use and theoretically incorporates the network-specificity aspect of postadoption investments in explaining continuance. Specifically, we show that individual users’: 1) reputation among peer users of a system increases continuance; 2) system-mediated relationships with other users of the system increase continuance; and 3) investments in personalization of a system initially diminish continuance. Another notable contribution is the development and validation of several new measures for expertise-sharing network constructs.

[1]  John Dickhaut,et al.  Escalation Errors and the Sunk Cost Effect: An Explanation Based on Reputation and Information Asymmetries , 1989 .

[2]  J. King,et al.  Hardwiring Weak Ties: Interorganizational Computer-Mediated Communication, Occupational Communities, and Organizational Change , 1995 .

[3]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications , 1975 .

[4]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Virtual internet communities and commercial success: individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.com , 2001 .

[5]  C. W. Smith Auctions: The Social Construction of Value , 1989 .

[6]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[7]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[8]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[9]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. , 1978 .

[10]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[11]  E. Lawler,et al.  Commitment in exchange relations : test of a theory of relational cohesion , 1996 .

[12]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[13]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[14]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  Organization-Based Self-Esteem: Construct Definition, Measurement, And Validation , 1989 .

[15]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[16]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[17]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[18]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[19]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  When knowledge is the critical resource, knowledge management is the critical task , 1989 .

[20]  R. McDermott Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[21]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market , 2000 .

[22]  N. Fox,et al.  Gps in Cyberspace: The Sociology of a ‘Virtual Community’ , 1999 .

[23]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[24]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[25]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[26]  Amrit Tiwana Knowledge Integration in Virtual Teams: The Potential Role of Knowledge Management Systems , 2006 .

[27]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[28]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[29]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  G. Anthony Gorry,et al.  Creating a knowledge-sharing community: if you build it, will they come? , 2003, CACM.

[31]  Douglas B. Terry,et al.  Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry , 1992, CACM.

[32]  R. Hinde,et al.  Cooperation and prosocial behaviour , 1991 .

[33]  Bart Selman,et al.  Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering , 1997, CACM.

[34]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[35]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[36]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[37]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[38]  C. Rusbult,et al.  A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Impact on Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment, and Turnover of Variations in Rewards, Costs, Alternatives, and Investments , 1983 .

[39]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Sunk Costs in the NBA: Why Draft Order Affects Playing Time and Survival in Professional Basketball , 1995 .

[40]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[41]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Notes on improvisation and time in organizations , 1999 .

[42]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[43]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[44]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[45]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Anthony May A Penny for Your Thoughts [Book Review] , 2006 .

[47]  Stephanie Newport,et al.  Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action , 1991 .

[48]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[49]  George P. Huber,et al.  Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  William J. Doll,et al.  Research Report - A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the User Information Satisfaction Instrument , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[52]  Chip Heath,et al.  Escalation and De-escalation of Commitment in Response to Sunk Costs: The Role of Budgeting in Mental Accounting , 1995 .

[53]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  D. Leidner,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN IS RESEARCH , 2002 .

[55]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Toward Virtual Community Knowledge Evolution , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  David A. Owens,et al.  Technologies of status management status dynamics in e-mail communications , 2000 .

[57]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments , 1998, MIS Q..

[58]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[59]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Social capital and volunteerism in virtual communities: the case of the Internet Chess Club , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[60]  Peter Kollock,et al.  "An Eye for an Eye Leaves Everyone Blind": Cooperation and Accounting Systems , 1993 .

[61]  D. Dougherty,et al.  The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms , 1994 .

[62]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[63]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible , 2002, CACM.

[64]  Raymond P. Fisk,et al.  Theory construction in marketing : some thoughts on thinking , 1984 .

[65]  Gary Lynn,et al.  Knowledge Management in New Product Teams: Practices and Outcomes , 2000 .

[66]  Bradley N. Miller,et al.  Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News , 1997 .

[67]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Peer-to-peer valuation as a mechanism for reinforcing active learning in virtual communities: actualizing social exchange theory , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[68]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[69]  Elaine Davis,et al.  Prospect Theory Predictions When Escalation Is Not the Only Chance to Recover Sunk Costs , 1994 .

[70]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[71]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[72]  David A. Nembhard,et al.  An individual-based description of learning within an organization , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[73]  S. Boon,et al.  The dynamics of interpersonal trust: resolving uncertainty in the ace of risk , 1991 .

[74]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Interorganizational transfer of knowledge: an analysis of patent citations of a defense firm , 1991, Technology Management : the New International Language.

[75]  H. Garland Throwing Good Money After Bad: The Effect of Sunk Costs on the Decision to Escalate Commitment to an Ongoing Project , 1990 .