Good news, good news: occupational and household activities are important for energy expenditure, but sport and recreation remain the best buy for public health (vol 46, pg 702, 2012)
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] C. Ratzlaff. Good news, bad news: sports matter but occupational and household activity really matter – sport and recreation unlikely to be a panacea for public health , 2012, British Journal of Sports Medicine.
[2] D. Thompson,et al. Relationships of occupational and non-occupational physical activity to abdominal obesity , 2012, International Journal of Obesity.
[3] Corby K. Martin,et al. Randomized Controlled Trial , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.
[4] A. Bauman,et al. Stand up, sit down, keep moving: turning circles in physical activity research? , 2008, British Journal of Sports Medicine.
[5] R. Withers,et al. Measurement and prediction of METs during household activities in 35- to 45-year-old females , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.
[6] James A Levine,et al. Labor saved, calories lost: the energetic impact of domestic labor-saving devices. , 2003, Obesity research.
[7] S. Trost,et al. Measurement of energy expenditure of daily tasks among mothers of young children. , 2001, Journal of science and medicine in sport.
[8] K Yaffe,et al. A prospective study of physical activity and cognitive decline in elderly women: women who walk. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.