An Argument Structure Abstraction for Bayesian Belief Networks: Just Outcomes in On-line Dispute Resolution
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Giovanni Sartor,et al. Introduction: from legal theories to neural networks and fuzzy reasoning , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[2] John Zeleznikow,et al. Family_Winner: Integrating Game Theory and Heuristics to Provide Negotiation Support , 2003 .
[3] Jeroen Keppens,et al. Linguistic Bayesian Networks for reasoning with subjective probabilities in forensic statistics , 2003, ICAIL.
[4] Andrew Stranieri,et al. The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..
[5] Andrew Stranieri,et al. Using Argumentation for the Decomposition and Classification of Tasks for Hybrid System Development , 1997, ICONIP.
[6] Andrew Stranieri,et al. Knowledge Discovery from Legal Databases , 2005 .
[7] A. Lodder. DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation , 1999 .
[8] George C. Christie. An Essay on Discretion , 1986 .
[9] S. Toulmin. The uses of argument , 1960 .
[10] Ronald Dworkin,et al. Taking Rights Seriously , 1977 .
[11] John Zeleznikow,et al. Trade-Off Manipulations in the Development of Negotiation Decision Support Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[12] Gary A. Davis,et al. Bayesian networks and traffic accident reconstruction , 2003, ICAIL.
[13] Jurgen Harms,et al. Online Dispute Resolution Systems as Web Services , 2006 .
[14] M. Menlowe,et al. Procedural Justice: Allocating to Individuals , 1990 .
[15] Andrew Stranieri,et al. Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.
[16] Jürgen Hollatz. Analogy making in legal reasoning with neural networks and fuzzy logic , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.