Stochastic Fusion of Information for Characterizing and Monitoring the Vadose Zone

are still often raised regarding parameter identifiability and their uniqueness for particular methods. Inverse problems for hydrological processes in the vadose zone While various laboratory and field methods for evaluare often perceived as being ill posed and intractable. Consequently, ating soil hydraulic properties are relatively well estabsolutions to the inverse problems are frequently subject to skepticism. In this paper, we examine the necessary and sufficient conditions for lished, several major problems remain. Most laboratory the inverse problems to be well posed and discuss difficulties associ- methods are applied to samples ranging from 100 to ated with solving the inverse problems. We subsequently explain the about 500 cm 3 . The scale of field methods generally does need for a stochastic conceptualization of inverse problems of the not extend beyond a plot of 1 m 2 and depths of one to vadose zone. Principles of geostatistically based inverse approaches, several meters. There is an urgent need to develop methwhich rely on stochastic concepts, are then illustrated, including cok- ods that characterize hydraulic properties of the vadose riging, a sequential linear estimator, and a successive linear estimator. zone on a much larger scale. Recently developed geoWe then discuss applications involved in the approaches to classical physical methods such as electrical resistivity tomogravadose zone inversion problems (using observed pressure heads, mois

[1]  J. A. Vargas-Guzmán,et al.  Sequential kriging and cokriging: Two powerful geostatistical approaches , 1999 .

[2]  S. P. Neuman Calibration of distributed parameter groundwater flow models viewed as a multiple‐objective decision process under uncertainty , 1973 .

[3]  G. Dagan,et al.  Stochastic identification of transmissivity and effective recharge in steady groundwater flow: 2. Case study , 1987 .

[4]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[5]  D. Evans,et al.  Unsaturated fractured rock characterization methods and data sets at the Apache Leap Tuff Site , 1990 .

[6]  R. Srivastava,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical model for water flow and transport of chemically reactive solute through porous media under variably saturated conditions , 1992 .

[7]  Peter Droogers,et al.  Inverse method to determine soil hydraulic functions from multistep outflow experiments. , 1994 .

[8]  Todd C. Rasmussen,et al.  PERMEABILITY OF APACHE LEAP TUFF : BOREHOLE AND CORE MEASUREMENTS USING WATER AND AIR , 1993 .

[9]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem , 1996 .

[10]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis , 1984 .

[11]  C. Rose,et al.  Determination of hydraulic conductivity as a function of depth and water content for soil in situ , 1965 .

[12]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  An Iterative Cokriging‐Like Technique for Ground‐Water Flow Modeling , 1995 .

[13]  Velimir V. Vesselinov,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross‐hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 1. Methodology and borehole effects , 2001 .

[14]  T.-C. Jim Yeh,et al.  A Geostatistical Inverse Method for Variably Saturated Flow in the Vadose Zone , 1995 .

[15]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Type curve interpretation of a cross‐hole pneumatic injection test in unsaturated fractured tuff , 2001 .

[16]  R. Liedl A conceptual perturbation model of water movement in stochastically heterogeneous soils , 1994 .

[17]  James J. Butler,et al.  Pumping tests in networks of multilevel sampling wells: Motivation and methodology , 1999 .

[18]  K. Huang,et al.  Simultaneous inversion of air‐injection tests in fractured unsaturated tuff at Yucca Mountain , 1999 .

[19]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  An Application of the Geostatistical Approach to the Inverse Problem in Two-Dimensional Groundwater Modeling , 1984 .

[20]  K. K. Watson An instantaneous profile method for determining the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous materials , 1966 .

[21]  D. Mulla Estimating Spatial Patterns in Water Content, Matric Suction, and Hydraulic Conductivity , 1988 .

[22]  T. Harter,et al.  Conditional stochastic analysis of solute transport in heterogeneous, variably saturated soils , 1996 .

[23]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross‐hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 2. Equivalent parameters, high‐resolution stochastic imaging and scale effects , 2001 .

[24]  T. Yeh,et al.  Cokriging estimation of the conductivity field under variably saturated flow conditions , 1999 .

[25]  A. Warrick,et al.  Estimating Soil Water Content Using Cokriging1 , 1987 .

[26]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Mapping Hydraulic Conductivity: Sequential Conditioning with Measurements of Solute Arrival Time, Hydraulic Head, and Local Conductivity , 1995 .

[27]  Jack C. Parker,et al.  Determining Soil Hydraulic Properties from One-step Outflow Experiments by Parameter Estimation: I. Theory and Numerical Studies1 , 1985 .

[28]  David L. Alumbaugh,et al.  A geostatistically based inverse model for electrical resistivity surveys and its applications to vadose zone hydrology , 2002 .

[29]  P. Kitanidis Parameter Uncertainty in Estimation of Spatial Functions: Bayesian Analysis , 1986 .

[30]  Andrew Binley,et al.  High‐resolution characterization of vadose zone dynamics using cross‐borehole radar , 2001 .

[31]  W. Yeh Review of Parameter Identification Procedures in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem , 1986 .

[32]  Peter Droogers,et al.  Inverse Method for Determining Soil Hydraulic Functions from One‐Step Outflow Experiments , 1992 .

[33]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Determination of Horizontal Aquifer Anisotropy with Three Wells , 1984 .

[34]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  A stochastic inverse solution for transient groundwater flow: Parameter identification and reliability analysis , 1992 .

[35]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Spatial correlation structure estimation using geophysical and hydrogeological data , 1999 .

[36]  T.-C. Jim Yeh,et al.  An iterative geostatistical inverse method for steady flow in the vadose zone , 1996 .

[37]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Prediction of transmissivities, heads, and seepage velocities using mathematical modeling and geostatistics , 1989 .

[38]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Estimating lithologic and transport properties in three dimensions using seismic and tracer data , 1996 .

[39]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Co-kriging for stochastic flow models , 1989 .

[40]  Robert Christian. Trautz Rock fracture aperture and gas conductivity measurements in situ , 1984 .

[41]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  UNSATURATED CONDUCTIVITY AND DIFFUSIVITY MEASUREMENTS BY A CONSTANT FLUX METHOD , 1962 .

[42]  J. Nitao,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement , 1992 .

[43]  T. Yeh,et al.  A geostatistically based inverse model for three-dimensional variably saturated flow , 1998 .

[44]  Brian J. Mailloux,et al.  Hydrogeological characterization of the south oyster bacterial transport site using geophysical data , 2001 .

[45]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part: 1. Mathematical development , 1981 .

[46]  T. Zurmühl Evaluation of Different Boundary Conditions for Independent Determination of Hydraulic Parameters Using Outflow Methods , 1996 .

[47]  Minghui Jin,et al.  AN ITERATIVE STOCHASTIC INVERSE METHOD: CONDITIONAL EFFECTIVE TRANSMISSIVITY AND HYDRAULIC HEAD FIELDS , 1995 .

[48]  W. P. Kelley,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE COLLOIDS OF A CECIL AND A SUSQUEHANNA SOIL PROFILE , 1939 .

[49]  James Saling,et al.  Radioactive Waste Management , 1990 .

[50]  Shuyun Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: Sandbox experiments , 2001 .

[51]  Shuyun Liu A sequential inverse approach for hydraulic tomography and electrical resistivity tomography: An effective method for site characterization , 2001 .

[52]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  The Use of Cokriging with Limited Field Soil Observations 1 , 1983 .

[53]  Ole Wendroth,et al.  Parameter Estimation Analysis of the Evaporation Method for Determining Soil Hydraulic Properties , 1998 .

[54]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  Mapping permeability in heterogeneous aquifers using hydrologic and seismic data , 1992 .

[55]  Y. Stylianou,et al.  PROCEDURE AND TEST OF AN INTERNAL DRAINAGE METHOD FOR MEASURING SOIL HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS IN SITU , 1972 .

[56]  A. Sato,et al.  Three‐dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography , 2001 .

[57]  N. Sun Inverse problems in groundwater modeling , 1994 .

[58]  G. D. LeCain Air-Injection Testing in Vertical Boreholes in Welded and Nonwelded Tuff, Yucca Mountain, Nevada , 1997 .

[59]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR DATA : A MEANS OF DESCRIBING SPATIAL VARIATION IN THE SUBSURFACE , 1998 .

[60]  J. Carrera,et al.  On geostatistical formulations of the groundwater flow inverse problem , 1991 .

[61]  L. Gelhar Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology , 1992 .

[62]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic properties from multiple tension disc infiltrometer data , 1997 .

[63]  P. Kitanidis Comment on “A reassessment of the groundwater inverse problem” by D. McLaughlin and L. R. Townley , 1997 .

[64]  E. G. Vomvoris,et al.  A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one‐dimensional simulations , 1983 .

[65]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Summary of air permeability data from single-hole injection tests in unsaturated fractured tuffs at the Apache Leap Research Site: Results of steady-state test interpretation , 1996 .

[66]  R. G. Hills,et al.  Unsaturated Hydraulic Properties from Upward Flow into Soil Cores , 1996 .

[67]  T. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .

[68]  R. Dmowska,et al.  International Geophysics Series , 1992 .

[69]  R. Hills,et al.  Parameter estimation of hydraulic properties from one‐step outflow data , 1992 .

[70]  T.-C. Jim Yeh,et al.  An inverse model for three‐dimensional flow in variably saturated porous media , 2000 .

[71]  W. R. Gardner SOME STEADY‐STATE SOLUTIONS OF THE UNSATURATED MOISTURE FLOW EQUATION WITH APPLICATION TO EVAPORATION FROM A WATER TABLE , 1958 .

[72]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[73]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography , 1995 .