Seeking synergistic effect- : A key principle in process intensification

Process intensification calls for the combination of two or more conventional unit operations within one framework, thus giving rise to a challenging coordination problem in process synthesis and design. Seeking synergistic effect among all the conventional unit operations involved is found to be an important principle for process development. Three cases of process intensification are studied to evaluate the principle, including: (i) a hypothetical reactive distillation system; (ii) a reactive distillation column for the hydration of ethylene oxide; (iii) an ideal heat-integrated distillation column. It is demonstrated that simply combining two or more conventional unit operations together does not necessarily tap out the full potentials of capital investment reduction and energy saving. Only after the synergistic effect has been deliberately considered in process synthesis and design, can process intensification be carried out in the most effective manner. Furthermore, seeking synergistic effect appears frequently to yield improved process dynamics and provide additional redundancy to process operation because the underlying conflicts could be attenuated among all the conventional unit operations involved.

[1]  Domingos Barbosa,et al.  Optimization of reactive distillation processes with simulated annealing , 2000 .

[2]  J. W. Lee,et al.  Widening the applicability of reactive distillation technology by using concurrent design , 2004 .

[3]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Generalized modular representation framework for process synthesis , 1996 .

[4]  Masaru Nakaiwa,et al.  Internally Heat-Integrated Distillation Columns: A Review , 2003 .

[5]  J. de Graauw,et al.  Internal heat integration – the key to an energy‐conserving distillation column , 2003 .

[6]  Amy R. Ciric,et al.  Synthesis of nonequilibrium reactive distillation processes by MINLP optimization , 1994 .

[7]  Masaru Nakaiwa,et al.  Simulation oriented development of a new heat integrated distillation column and its characteristics , 1997 .

[8]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Reactive Separations: More Ways to Skin a Cat , 2001 .

[9]  Atsushi Tsutsumi,et al.  Reactive distillation design with considerations of heats of reaction , 2006 .

[10]  Dennis C. Hendershot,et al.  Dynamic Disadvantages of Intensification in Inherently Safer Process Design , 2004 .

[11]  A. Tsutsumi,et al.  Towards further internal heat integration in design of reactive distillation columns—part I: The design principle , 2005 .

[12]  Robin Smith.  Chemical process design , 1994 .

[13]  Keigo Matsuda,et al.  Interpreting Design of an Ideal Heat-Integrated Distillation Column through Exergy Analysis , 2006 .

[14]  Muhammad A. Al-Arfaj,et al.  Comparison of Alternative Control Structures for an Ideal Two-Product Reactive Distillation Column , 2000 .

[15]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Modular synthesis framework for combined separation/reaction systems , 2001 .

[16]  W. Luyben,et al.  Control of distillation columns with low relative volatilities , 1989 .

[17]  Masaru Nakaiwa,et al.  A Numerical Consideration on Dynamic Modeling and Control of Ideal Heat Integrated Distillation Columns , 1996 .

[18]  Atsushi Tsutsumi,et al.  Towards further internal heat integration in design of reactive distillation columns—Part II. The process dynamics and operation , 2006 .

[19]  A. Stankiewicz.  Reactive separations for process intensification: an industrial perspective , 2003 .

[20]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Economic and Dynamic Impact of the Use of Excess Reactant in Reactive Distillation Systems , 2000 .

[21]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Pollution prevention through process integration , 1997 .

[22]  Masaru Nakaiwa,et al.  DYNAMICS OF IDEAL HEAT INTEGRATED DISTILLATION COLUMNS , 1996 .

[23]  Johan Grievink,et al.  Optimal design and sensitivity analysis of reactive distillation units using collocation models , 2001 .