Social Movements On The Internet: Together Alone Or Alone Together?

Sherry Turkle in her groundbreaking book ‘Alone Together’ suggests that the Internet gives an illusion of togetherness while contributing to isolation. How might this play out in social movements on the Internet? Can social media bring people together? This research in progress explores the role of social media as a way to facilitate collective political action. It discusses the preliminary findings of a grounded theory analysis of the postings to a Spanish online social movement between July and September 2012. Informed by a sociomaterial perspective, by which the social and the technical interact symmetrically, our analysis shows that there are heterogeneous groups cohabiting in the online environment, and using information technology as a platform to make their voices heard. The challenge for them remains in gaining space in the political decision-making process that takes place offline. They may indeed have achieved being ‘together alone’, but there is still difficulty in accessing power structures that would enable them to achieve social change.

[1]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[2]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 2: The Power of Identity , 1998, Contemporary Sociology.

[3]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[4]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[5]  Hao Lou,et al.  Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a groupware application , 2000 .

[6]  Victor W. Pickard Cooptation and cooperation: institutional exemplars of democratic internet technology , 2008, New Media Soc..

[7]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[9]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[10]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[11]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Mobilizers Mobilized: Information, Expression, Mobilization and Participation in the Digital Age , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  C. Ciborra,et al.  The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, and Contexts , 2004 .

[13]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Joseph A Parker,et al.  The power of association. , 2005, GHA today.

[15]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement , 2011, Commun. Res..

[16]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  COMMUNICATION THEORY Communication Theory ISSN 1050-3293 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R Model of Communication Effects , 2022 .

[17]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Reconceptualizing Collective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2005 .

[18]  R. Mansell From Digital Divides to Digital Entitlements in Knowledge Societies , 2002 .

[19]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[20]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[21]  J. Earl,et al.  Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age , 2011 .

[22]  W. Bennett,et al.  DIGITAL MEDIA AND THE PERSONALIZATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION , 2011 .

[23]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[24]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Peter Van Aelst,et al.  INTERNET AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT ACTION REPERTOIRES , 2010 .

[26]  J. V. Laer,et al.  INTERNET AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT ACTION REPERTOIRES: Opportunities and limitations , 2010 .

[27]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[28]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2011 .

[29]  M. Castells ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .

[30]  Douglas M. Wood,et al.  Alone Together, Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2012 .

[31]  Mario Guerrero,et al.  Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Anastasia Kavada,et al.  Engagement, bonding, and identity across multiple platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace , 2012 .

[33]  Yining Chen,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use a Groupware Application , 2000, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[34]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Weak Ties in Networked Communities , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[35]  David Macey,et al.  Can We Live Together?: Equality and Difference , 2000 .

[36]  Manuel Castells Mobile communication and society : a global perspective : a project of the Annenberg Research Network on international communication , 2007 .

[37]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action , 1993 .

[38]  M. Castells The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[39]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement , 2007 .

[40]  Timothy Rowe,et al.  The Power of Association. , 2015, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.